Case Studies
May 19, 2020

Ranking of the Sections of East Siberia–Pacific Ocean Main Pipeline by Accident Probability Using Bow-Tie Method and Checklist Support Tool

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11, Issue 3

Abstract

When developing a methodology for assessing the risks of Russian pipelines, it is necessary to take into account the difficult conditions for the passage and functioning of fuel energy facilities. Given the Russian realities, the accident risk weights were modified at the East Siberia–Pacific Ocean (ESPO) pipeline section. To assess the risks, the bow-tie method was used, as well as a standard checklist questionnaire. The largest pipeline accidents in the world in recent times were analyzed. The main accidents reasons were corrosion and anthropogenic factors. Methods for visualizing accident information with subsequent optimization of risk indicators during operation of trunk pipelines are proposed. It also is proposed to take into account the hydrographic coefficient, which shows the difficulty of laying the pipeline in rough terrain. Future efforts should concentrate on the development of software for assessing the risks of accidents on the ESPO pipeline.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Boguslavskiy, E. I., and V. V. Fitsak. 2017. “Technology and economics of near-surface geothermal resources exploitation.” J. Min. Inst. 224: 189–198. https://doi.org/10.18454/pmi.2017.2.189.
Choi, D., S. Choi, and Y. J. Choi. 2016. “A structural design of aviation safety inspection checklist for safety information analysis and safety risk assessment.” J. Korean Soc. Aviat. Aeronaut. 24 (2): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2016.24.2.059.
de Ruijter, A., and F. Guldenmund. 2016. “The bowtie method: A review.” Saf. Sci. 88 (Oct): 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.001.
Dets, I. A. 2019. “ESPO oil pipeline: Assessment of impact on social and economic development of municipal districts.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 381 (1): 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/381/1/012018.
Diaz-Bejarano, E., A. V. Porsin, and S. Macchietto. 2016. “Enhancing the flexibility of pipeline infrastructure to cope with heavy oils: Incremental thermal retrofit.” Appl. Therm. Eng. 105: 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.150.
Gulakova, O. I., Y. S. Ershov, N. M. Ibragimov, and T. S. Novikova. 2018. “Evaluation of the public efficiency of an infrastructure project: A case study of the Eastern Siberia–Pacific Ocean-2 oil pipeline.” Reg. Res. Russia 8 (2): 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518020053.
Guo, S., J. Li, K. Liang, and B. Tang. 2019. “Improved safety checklist analysis approach using intelligent video surveillance in the construction industry—A case study.” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (Oct): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1685781.
Hao, M. J., Q. J. You, and Z. Yue. 2017. “Risk analysis of urban gas pipeline network based on improved bow-tie model.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 93 (1): 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/93/1/012059.
Klimova, I. 2017. “Instructional maps of safe working methods and practices for separate types of operations conducted in the oil mine.” J. Min. Inst. 225: 354–359. https://doi.org/10.18454/pmi.2017.3.354.
Kovshov, S. V., T. A. Alimhanova, and V. M. Kitsis. 2020. “Methodology for assessing the risks of emergencies on the East Siberia–Pacific Ocean oil and gas main pipeline.” Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 10 (1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdfeb20202.
Layouni, M., M. S. Hamdi, and S. Tahar. 2017. “Detection and sizing of metal-loss defects in oil and gas pipelines using pattern-adapted wavelets and machine learning.” Appl. Soft Comput. 52 (Mar): 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.040.
Mitrova, T. 2016. “Russian energy outlook.” In Encyclopedia of mineral and energy policy, edited by G. Tiess, T. Hamdi, and P. Cameron, 1–12. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40871-7.
Muniz, M. V. P., G. B. A. Lima, R. G. G. Caiado, and O. L. G. Quelhas. 2018. “Bow tie to improve risk management of natural gas pipelines” Process Saf. Prog. 37 (2): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11901.
Paschke, M. 2017. “Legal challenges of the new energy policy in Germany.” J. Min. Inst. 226: 487–496. https://doi.org/10.25515/pmi.2017.4.487https://doi.org/10.25515/pmi.2017.4.487.
Rosecrance, J., R. Paulsen, and L. Murgia. 2017. “Risk assessment of cheese processing tasks using the Strain Index and OCRA Checklist.” Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 61 (Sep): 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2017.05.009.
Rostechnadzor. 2013. Federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety “Safety rules for hazardous production facilities on main pipelines.”. Moscow: Rostechnadzor.
Watts, J. M., and J. R. Hall. 2016. “Introduction to fire risk analysis.” In SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 2817–2826. New York: Springer.
Xiaoliang, Z., S. Qian, Z. Daoliang, Z. Zhikai, H. Rui, and S. Huijuan. 2017. “Risk assessment on chemical plants by the method of safety checklist analysis.” Process Saf. Prog. 36 (1): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11827.
Zambrano, C. J. R., S. Kovshov, and E. Lyubin. 2018. “Assessment of anthropogenic factor of accident risk on the main oil pipeline Pascuales - Cuenca in Ecuador.” J. Appl. Eng. Sci. 16 (3): 307–312. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes16-17019.
Zhang, P., G. Qin, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Risk assessment system for oil and gas pipelines laid in one ditch based on quantitative risk analysis.” Energies 12 (6): 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12060981.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: Sep 28, 2019
Accepted: Feb 27, 2020
Published online: May 19, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 19, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Safety Dept., Saint Petersburg Mining Univ., 2, 21st Line, St. Petersburg 199106, Russia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-6911. Email: [email protected]
T. A. Alimhanova, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Safety Dept., Saint Petersburg Mining Univ., 2, 21st Line, St. Petersburg 199106, Russia. Email: [email protected]
V. M. Kitsis, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Tourism Dept., National Research Mordovia State Univ., 68, Bol’shevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share