Technical Papers
Jul 24, 2018

Defect-Based ArcGIS Tool for Prioritizing Inspection of Sewer Pipelines

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 9, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper presents a defect-based model for assessing risk of failure for sewer pipelines. The proposed model deploys a Sugeno fuzzy inference system to create a risk index from which inspection and replacement activities may be prioritized. To determine the likelihood of failure, dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) was used as an inference engine to predict the likelihood of sewer pipeline failure based on both probable defects that could occur and some pipeline characteristics. The consequences of failure were determined using an economic loss model that assumed both costs resulting from the failure of sewer pipelines and benefits from avoiding such failures. An ArcGIS tool was created using the Python programming language to perform the Sugeno fuzzy inference method and determine the risk of failure by combining both the likelihood and consequences of failure. Actual data for inspected sewer pipelines in Doha, Qatar, were used to validate the tool; in the validation, the pipelines from the model were compared with the inspected pipelines. It was found that, if deployed, the proposed tool could save more than 77% over the current inspection practices followed by municipalities. It is expected that the resulting risk map would help key personnel in municipalities to identify sewer pipelines that require immediate interventions and would assist in better planning for inspection programs, especially in cases of limited funds.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This publication was made possible by National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) Grant No. (NPRP6-357-2-150) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. Also the authors would like to thank the public works authority of Qatar (Ashghal) for their support in the data collection.

References

Allouche, E., S. Ariaratnam, and S. AbouRizk. 2000. “Multidimensional utility model for selection of a trenchless construction method.” In Proc., Construction Congress VI, 543–553. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ana, E. V. 2009. “Sewer asset management: Sewer structural deterioration modeling and multicriteria decision making in sewer rehabilitation projects prioritization.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of engineering, Univ. of Brussels.
Ariaratnam, S. T., A. El-Assaly, and Y. Yang. 2001. “Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (4): 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(160).
ASCE. 2017. “2017 grades.” Report card for America’s infrastructure. Accessed December 24, 2016. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.
Baik, H. S., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water. Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
Baur, R., and R. Herz. 2002. “Selective inspection planning with aging forecast for sewer types.” Water Sci. Technol. 46 (6–7): 389–396. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0704.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2012. Investigation and assessment of drain and sewer systems outside buildings—General requirements. London: BSI.
DWA (German Association for Water, Wastewater, and Waste). 2015. State detection and assessment of drain and sewer systems outside buildings. Part 3: Assessment by optical inspection. Hennef, Germany: DWA.
Elmasry, M., A. Hawari, and T. Zayed. 2017a. “Cost benefit analysis for failure of sewer pipelines.” In Vol. 120 of Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 08006. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Elmasry, M., A. Hawari, and T. Zayed. 2017b. “Defect based deterioration model for sewer pipelines using Bayesian belief networks.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 44 (9): 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2016-0592.
Ennaouri, I., and M. Fuamba. 2013. “New integrated condition-assessment model for combined storm-sewer systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 139 (1): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000217.
FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities). 2016. “Informing the future: The 2016 Canadian infrastructure report card (CIRC-2016).” Accessed September 30, 2017. http://canadainfrastructure.ca/.
Fréchet, M. 1927. “Sur la loi de probabilité de l’écart maximum.” In Vol. 6 of Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathematique, 93–116. Cracovie, Poland.
Gourvil, L., and F. Joubert. 2004. Évaluation de la congestion routièredans la région de Montréal: Québec: Transports Québec. Quebec, Canada: Ministère des Transports du Québec—Les Conseillers ADEC Inc.
Hahn, M. A., R. N. Palmer, M. S. Merrill, and A. B. Lukas. 2002. “Expert system for prioritizing the inspection of sewers: Knowledge base formulation and evaluation.” J. Water. Resour. Plann. Manage. 128 (2): 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:2(121).
Halfawy, M. R., L. Dridi, and S. Baker. 2008. “Integrated decision support system for optimal renewal planning of sewer networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 22 (6): 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2008)22:6(360).
Hawari, A., F. Alkadour, M. Elmasry, and T. Zayed. 2017. “Simulation-based condition assessment model for sewer pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 128 (2): 04016066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000914.
Hintz, A. M., D. Barnes, and D. C. Millar. 2007. “Establishing a collection system baseline condition assessment program one step at a time.” In Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kanakoudis, V., and S. Tsitsifli. 2012. “Water pipe network reliability assessment using the DAC method.” Desalin. Water Treat. 33 (1–3): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2631.
Kanakoudis, V., S. Tsitsifli, M. Cerk, P. Banovec, P. Samaras, and A. I. Zouboulis. 2015a. “Basic principles of a DSS tool developed to prioritize NRW reduction measures in water pipe networks.” Water Qual. Exposure Health 7 (1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-014-0111-0.
Kanakoudis, V., S. Tsitsifli, P. Samaras, A. Zouboulis, and P. Banovec. 2013. “A new set of water losses-related performance indicators focused on areas facing water scarcity conditions.” Desalin. Water Treat. 51 (13–15): 2994–3010. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.748448.
Kanakoudis, V., S. Tsitsifli, P. Samaras, A. Zouboulis, and G. Demetriou. 2011. “Developing appropriate performance indicators for urban water distribution systems evaluation at Mediterranean countries.” Water Util. J. 1 (1): 31–40.
Kanakoudis, V., S. Tsitsifli, and A. I. Zouboulis. 2015b. “WATERLOSS project: Developing from theory to practice an integrated approach towards NRW reduction in urban water systems.” Desalin. Water Treat. 54 (8): 2147–2157. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.934114.
Kanakoudis, V. K. 2004a. “A troubleshooting manual for handling operational problems in water pipe networks.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. Aqua 53 (2): 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2004.0010.
Kanakoudis, V. K. 2004b. “Vulnerability based management of water resources systems.” J. Hydroinf. 6 (2): 133–156. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2004.0012.
Kanakoudis, V. K. 2008. “Ex-post evaluation of a water distribution network upgrading project.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. Aqua 57 (3): 195–202. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2008.087.
Kanakoudis, V. K., and D. K. Tolikas. 2001. “The role of leaks and breaks in water networks: Technical and economical solutions.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. Aqua 50 (5): 301–311. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2001.0025.
Kanakoudis, V. K., and D. K. Tolikas. 2004. “Assessing the performance level of a water system.” Water Air Soil Pollut. Focus 4 (4–5): 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000044807.41719.c7.
Karwowski, W., and A. Mital. 1986. “Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 19 (2): 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(86)90031-X.
Kelly, S. 2015. “Estimating economic loss from cascading infrastructure failure: A perspective on modelling interdependency.” Infrastruct. Complexity 2: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40551-015-0010-y.
Kleiner, Y. 2001. “Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (4): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(136).
Kleiner, Y., B. Rajani, and R. Sadiq. 2005. Risk management of large-diameter water transmission mains. Denver: American Water Works Association.
Kleiner, Y., B. Rajani, and R. Sadiq. 2007. “Sewerage infrastructure: Fuzzy techniques to manage failures.” In Wastewater reuse: Risk assessment, decision making and environmental security, edited by M. K. Zaidi, 241–252. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Kleiner, Y., R. Sadiq, and B. Rajani. 2004. “Modeling failure risk in buried pipes using fuzzy Markov deterioration process.” In Proc., Pipeline Engineering and Construction: What’s on the Horizon?, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Le Gat, Y. 2008. “Modeling the deterioration process of drainage pipelines.” Urban Water J. 5 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620801939398.
Lin, C. T., and C. G. Lee. 1996. Neural fuzzy systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall.
Mamdani, E. H., and S. Assilian. 1975. “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.” Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 7 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.
Martin, T., D. Johnson, and S. Anschell. 2007. “Using historical repair data to create customized predictive failure curves for sewer pipe risk modeling.” In Proc., Leading Edge Conf. on Strategic Asset Management. London: International Water Association.
McDonald, S., and J. Zhao. 2001. “Condition assessment and rehabilitation of large sewers.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Underground Infrastructure Research, 361–369. Waterloo, Canada: Univ. of Waterloo.
Prieto, L., and J. A. Sacristán. 2003. “Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).” Health Qual. Life Outcomes 1 (1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-80.
Pucker, J., E. Allouche, and R. Sterling. 2006. “Social costs associated with trenchless projects: Case histories in North America and Europe.” In Proc., NASTT No-Dig Conf., C4–04. Cleveland, OH: NASTT.
Python Core Team. 2017. “Python: A dynamic, open source programming language: Python Software Foundation.” Accessed April 15, 2017. https://www.python.org/.
Rahman, S., and D. Vanier. 2001. An evaluation of condition assessment protocols for sewer management. Ottawa: National Research Center.
Rahman, S., D. J. Vanier, and L. A. Newton. 2005. MIIP report: Social cost considerations for municipal infrastructure management. Ottawa: National Research Center.
Ruwanpura, J., S. T. Ariaratnam, and A. El-Assaly. 2004. “Prediction models for sewer infrastructure utilizing rule-based simulation.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 21 (3): 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600410001694192.
Sægrov, S., and W. Schilling. 2002. “Computer aided rehabilitation of sewer and storm water networks.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Urban Drainage–Global Solutions for Urban Drainage. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Salci, S., and G. Jenkins. 2016. Incorporating risk and uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis. Munich, Germany: Univ. Library of Munich.
Salman, B. 2010. “Infrastructure management and deterioration risk assessment of wastewater collection systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Cincinnati.
Salman, B., and O. Salem. 2012. “Risk assessment of wastewater collection lines using failure models and criticality ratings.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 3 (3): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000100.
Sinha, S. K., and R. A. McKim. 2007. “Probabilistic based integrated pipeline management system.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 22 (5–6): 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.05.005.
Sugeno, M., and T. Kang. 1988. “Structure identification of fuzzy model.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28 (1): 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(88)90113-3.
Tsitsifli, S., V. Kanakoudis, and I. Bakouros. 2011. “Pipe networks risk assessment based on survival analysis.” Water Resour. Manage. 25 (14): 3729–3746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9881-3.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2001. Project appraisal document on a proposed loan to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam for the Ho Chi Minh City environmental sanitation project. Geneva: Dept. of the World Bank.
Wirahadikusumah, R., D. Abraham, and T. Iseley. 2001. “Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (2): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(77).
WRC (Water Research Center). 2001. Manual of sewer condition classification. 4th ed. Wiltshire, UK: WRC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 9Issue 4November 2018

History

Received: Oct 16, 2017
Accepted: Apr 20, 2018
Published online: Jul 24, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 24, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Elmasry, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Construction and Environment, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., ZN716 Block Z Phase 8, Hung Hom, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]
Alaa Hawari [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share