Decision Analysis of Preferred Methods for Locating Underground Conduits
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 5, Issue 2
Abstract
The New Jersey DOT (NJDOT) operates and maintains a network of thousands of kilometers of conduits, many carrying fiber-optic cables that are vital to the state’s communication system. These primarily nonmetallic conduits frequently must be located and marked to avoid damage from construction. By design they can be located using a system of trace wires (TW) and radio-frequency detection. However, for various reasons the TW are missing and thus not functioning over a significant portion of the network. The purpose of the research reported in this paper was to analyze and improve the inventory information base, and find and compare effective methods for locating these conduits. Any candidate solution had to meet requirements for accuracy and depth sensitivity, be practical to implement, cost-effective, work with both metallic and plastic conduits, and be reliable. Innovative methods for locating underground conduits were investigated and evaluated with respect to various conditions. Validated approaches include enhancements to current TW methods, a new acoustic transmission (AT) method, and the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method. The benefits of optimized location include the following: (1) reduced cost and time from more expedient systems for locating conduits, (2) less accidental damage to conduits, (3) avoidance of connectivity problems and loss of crucial communications, and (4) preservation of the fiber-optic network. A decision process identifying the optimal solution with respect to various conditions was developed and is presented in this paper. To enable the best application of the decision approach, the underlying conduit and surrounding-environment data was improved using cross-referenced geographic soil map data to enable proper selection of location technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research reported in this paper was funded by the New Jersey DOT and the University Transportation Research Center. The support of the research management and operations staff in both organizations is gratefully acknowledged.
References
3M Corporation. (1999). Advanced cable and fault locator, St Paul, MN.
Auld, B. A. (1990). Acoustic fields and waves in solids, Vol. 2, 2nd Ed., Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL.
Ballard, N., Langman, A., and Inggs, M. (1994). “On-line complex permittivity measurements for ground penetrating radar.” Proc., IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., New York, Vol. 4, 2513–2515.
Bernhold, L. E., and Immer, M. (2002). Ground penetrating radar technology to locate plastic pipes and lava tubes, ASCE, Reston, VA, 24–31.
Capineri, L., Grande, P., and Temple, J. (1998). “Advanced image-processing technique for real-time interpretation of ground penetrating radar images.” Int. J. Imag. Technol., 9(1), 51–59.
Daniels, D. (2007). “Ground penetrating radar.” IET radar, sonar, navigation and aviation series, 2nd Ed., IEEE, New York.
Duvoisin, H. (2003). “Detection of subsurface facilities including non-metallic pipe.” Final Rep., CyTerra Corporation, Waltham, MA.
Ekimov, A., and Lebedev, A. (1996). “Experimental study of local mass influence on sound radiation from a thin limited cylindrical shell.” Appl. Acoust., 48(1), 47–57.
Hyoung-Sun, Y., and Chen, C. (2003). “Neural detection for buried pipes using fully-polarimetric ground penetrating radar system.” Proc., Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp., IEEE, New York, 22–27, 231–234.
Katz, A., Karaa, F., and Niver, E. (2011). “Innovative and effective techniques for locating underground conduits.” Rep. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)-NJ-2011-001, Washington, DC.
Martin-Seigle, S., Pelissier, M., and Filippi, P. (1999). “Acoustic radiation from a finite length cylindrical shell excited by an internal acoustic source: Solution based on a boundary element method and a matched asymptotic expansion.” Flow Turb. Comb., 61(1–4), 71–83.
Michiguchi, Y., Hiramoto, K., Nishi, M., Takahashi, F., Ohraka, T., and Okada, M. (1987). “Development of signal processing methods for imaging buned pipes.” Proc., IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, New York, 11–15.
Mitri, F. (2005). “Frequency dependence of the acoustic radiation force acting on absorbing cylindrical shells.” Ultrasonics, 43(4), 271–277.
Morey, R. M. (1998). Ground penetrating radar for evaluating subsurface conditions for transportation facilities–A synthesis of highway practice, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Moscovic, J. (2003). “Underground ducts: The role of GPR to locate and disseminate information on a duct bank.” Proc., National Grid Annual Workshop, New York.
Pettinelli, E., DiMattei, A., Mattei, E., Crocco, L., Soldovieri, F., Redman, J. D., and Annan, A. P. (2009). “GPR response from buried pipes: Measurement on field site and tomographic reconstruction.” Proc., IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(8), 2639–2645.
Physical Acoustics. (2010). D9241A acoustic emissions sensor, Princeton, NJ.
Radiodetection. (2002). RD4000TL advanced telecommunication cable line locator, Raymond, ME.
Radiodetection. (2008). RD8000 universal precision cable and pipe locator, Raymond, ME.
Sensors, and Software. (2013). “GPR case studies.” 〈http://www.sensoft.ca/applications/buried/casestudy/cs_plasticmetalpipes.html〉 (Oct. 28, 2013).
Sterling, R. L., et al. (2009). “Encouraging innovation in locating and characterizing underground utilities.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Thomas, A. M., Rogers, C., Metje, N., and Chapman, D. (2007). “A stakeholder led accuracy assessment system for utility location.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, IEEE, New York, 272–277.
Veksler, N. D. (1993). Resonance acoustic spectroscopy, Springer, New York.
Xu, X., and Miller, E. L. (2002). “Optimization of migration method to locate buried object in lossy medium.” IEEE Inter. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Vol. 1, 337–339.
Xu, Y., Hoffmeyer, P., Narayanan, R., and Curtis, J. (1996). “Signal processing aspects of polarimetric random noise radar data for shallow subsurface imaging.” Proc., IEEE Symp. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, New York, 2030–2032.
Young, G. N. (2010). “Geophysical mapping versus locating utilities: where are we and where do we go from here?.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 1–10.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 5 • Issue 2 • May 2014
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 24, 2013
Accepted: Oct 8, 2013
Published online: Nov 26, 2013
Discussion open until: Apr 26, 2014
Published in print: May 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.