Case Studies
Sep 30, 2021

Sham Legality: Analyzing Taiwanese Experiences in Responding to COVID-19 in 2020

Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 23, Issue 1

Abstract

Modern governments strive to enhance their emergency management capacity and establish multiple policy tools that can help reduce damage caused by natural and human hazards. Among these institutional mechanisms, the constitution in Taiwan entrusts presidents with the authority to act immediately in response to an emergency based on the principle of necessity. The objective of this paper is to gain insight into the following questions: (1) How does the Taiwanese government respond to a pandemic and to what extent does this situation affect the Taiwanese governmental emergency response powers? (2) Do the Taiwanese governmental interventions contradict democratic values and civil liberties? By analyzing the boundaries and limitations of the presidential emergency power, demonstrating practical examples of the different views of Taiwanese presidents regarding their use of the emergency power to address catastrophic disasters, and exploring preemptive actions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors argue two points: (1) Taiwan’s administrative response to COVID-19 reveals a tendency toward having authority vastly centralized at the legislative level through blank-check authorization, and this represents the presumptive allocation of power embodied in the Republic of China Constitution, which has gradually expanded. (2) The vague and unfettered legal authorization by the CDC and the COVID-19 Special Act may diminish the substantial rule of law in the long run. This article demonstrates, by applying the assessment from a variety of key principles of constitutionalism, Taiwan exhibited how it has integrated institutional memories and past lessons. However, there continues to be in Taiwan an overdependent reliance on statutory authorization with the inherent risk of a slippery slope in exploiting legal authorization, coupled with administrative blind spots, that can generate disproportionate public measures. This leverage, we argue, supersedes the president’s discretionary emergency power, enabling emergency legislation without proper oversight, prevailing over ordinary constitutional order, and possibly producing a corrosive effect on civil liberties and the rule of law in the long term.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editors for their comments and insights.

References

Ackerman, B. 2004. “The emergency constitution.” Yale Law J. 113 (5): 1029–1091. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135710.
Balasubramaniam, R. R. 2008. “Indefinite detention rule by law or rule of law.” In Emergencies and the limits of legality, edited by V. Ramraj, 118–142. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, B. 2012. Presidential power and accountability: Toward a presidential accountability system. London: Routledge.
Capano, G., M. Howlett, D. S. L. Jarvis, M. Ramesh, and N. Goyal. 2020. “Mobilizing policy (in) capacity to fight COVID-19: Understanding variations in state responses.” Policy Soc. 39 (3): 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628.
Chang, W. C. 2020. “Taiwan’s fight against COVID-19: Constitutionalism, laws, and the global pandemic.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://verfassungsblog.de/taiwans-fight-against-covid-19-constitutionalism-laws-and-the-global-pandemic/.
Chen, C. M., et al. 2020. “Containing COVID-19 among 627,386 persons in contact with the Diamond Princess cruise ship passengers who disembarked in Taiwan: Big data analytics.” J. Med. Int. Res. 22 (5): e19540. https://doi.org/10.2196/19540.
Chen, C. T. 2010. “Research the effect of ‘disaster prevention and response act’ and the best timing to issue emergency order power.” J. Tokyo 4 (2): 234–245.
Chen, L. 1999. “President Lee announces emergency decree.” Taipei Times, September 26, 1999.
Chen, S. M. 2000. “The rule of law and national emergency.” Thought Words: Humanities Soc. Sci. 38 (1): 45–77.
Chou, Y. H. 2020. “Civil right problem in the pandemic: Article 7 of the COVID-19 special act.” Accessed August 15, 2021. https://www.legalaffairs.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=4822A808D79DC727&s=8CDDC0367082885C&sms=8E76D86114B5D601.
Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and L. H. Rykkja. 2020. “Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy.” Public Administration Rev. 76 (6): 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12558.
CNA (Central News Agency). 2020. “The president: Whether or not using emergency decree depends on the actual need.” Accessed May 10, 2021. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202003195006.aspx.
Cole, D. 2003. “Judging the next emergency: Judicial review and individual rights in times of crisis.” Michigan Law Rev. 101 (8): 2565–2595. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595389.
Comfort, L. K., W. L. Waugh Jr., and B. A. Cigler. 2012. “Emergency management research and practice in public administration: Emergence, evolution, expansion, and future directions.” Public Administration Rev. 72 (4): 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02549.x.
Dyzenhaus, D. 2006a. “Schmitt v. Dicey: Are states of emergency inside or outside the legal order.” Cardozo Law Rev. 27: 2005–2040.
Dyzenhaus, D. 2006b. The constitutional law: Legality in a time of emergency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dyzenhaus, D. 2012. “States of emergency.” In The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law, edited by M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Feng, S. E. 2020. “More than half of people approving Tsai’s job in responding to COVID-19 crisis.” Accessed May 30, 2020. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/76546.
Ferejohn, J., and P. Pasquino. 2004. “The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers.” Int. J. Constitution 2 (2): 210–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210.
Fisch, W. B. 1990. “Emergency in the constitutional law of the United States.” Am. J. Comp. Law 38 (Jan): 389–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/840550.
Fisher, L. 2014. “Holding the president accountable to constitutional limits.” Utah Law Rev. 2014 (4): 793.
Friedman, L. J. 2012. “Emergency powers of the executive: The President’s authority when all hell breaks loose.” J. Law Health 25 (2): 265–306.
Ginsburg, T., and M. Versteeg. 2020. “States of emergencies: Part I.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://blog.harvardlawreview.org/states-of-emergencies-part-i/.
Harris, E. A. 1992. “Living with the enemy: Terrorism and the limits of constitutionalism.” Columbia Law Rev. 92 (4): 984–996. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122975.
Harvard Law Review. 1983. “The international emergency economic powers act: A congressional attempt to control presidential emergency power.” Harvard Law Rev. 96 (5): 1102–1120. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341001.
Helsenorge. 2020. “Together we can fight coronavirus—Download the Smittestopp app.” Accessed June 10, 2021. https://helsenorge.no/coronavirus/smittestopp?redirect=false.
Huang, I. Y. F. 2020. “Fighting against COVID-19 through government initiatives and collaborative governance: Taiwan experience.” Public Administration Rev. 80 (4): 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13239.
Huang, Y. H. 2021. “The state of emergency in public health and the exceptional regulations in administrative law.” Angle Health Law Rev. 54 (Apr): 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13239.
Hwang, S. P. 2016. “The principle of proportionality in the trend of ‘hierarchicalization: Critical remarks on the current developments in constitutional review.’” Acad. Sin. Law J. 19 (1): 1–52.
Judicial Yuan, Republic of China. 2002. “Interpretations: No. 543.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://cons.judicial.gov.tw/jcc/en-us/jep03/show?expno=543.
Kuo, M. S. 2020. “A liberal darling or an inadvertent hand to dictators? Open-ended lawmaking and Taiwan’s legal response to the COVID pandemic.” Accessed May 20, 2020. ’http://www.iconnectblog.com/2020/04/a-liberal-darling-or-an-inadvertent-hand-to-dictators:-open-ended-lawmaking-and-taiwan’s-legal-response-to-the-covid-pandemic.
Lee, C. L. 2020a. “Taiwan’s proactive prevention of COVID-19 under constitutionalism.” Accessed April 20, 2020. https://verfassungsblog.de/taiwans-proactive-prevention-of-covid-19-under-constitutionalism/.
Lee, C. L. 2021. “The digital footprints: Between epidemic hotspots and civil rights.” Accessed August 15, 2021. https://covid19.ascdc.tw/essay/148.
Lee, T. L. 2020b. “Legal preparedness as part of COVID-19 response: The first 100 days in Taiwan.” Accessed April 22, 2020. https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/5/e002608.
Lee, Y. 2020c. “Taiwan’s new ‘electronic fence’ for quarantines leads wave of virus monitoring.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-taiwan-surveillanc/taiwans-new-electronic-fence-for-quarantines-leads-wave-of-virus-monitoring-idUSKBN2170SK.
Legislative Yuan, Republic of China. 2012. “Function and powers.” Accessed May 20, 2020. http://www.ly.gov.tw/en/01_introduce/introView.action?id=8.
Levinson, S. 2006. “Preserving constitutional norms in times of permanent emergencies.” Constellations 13 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1351-0487.2006.00440.x.
Liberty Times. 2009. “Ma apologizes for delaying disaster rescue.” Liberty Times, August 18, 2009.
Lin, C. F., C. H. Wu, and C. F. Wu. 2020. “Reimagining the administrative state in times of global health crisis: An anatomy of Taiwan’s regulatory action in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” Eur. J. Risk Regul. 11 (2): 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.25.
Lin, G. K., and B. J. Hsieh. 2020. “Analyzing response actions of COVID-19.” Taiwan Med. J. 63 (8): 49–58.
Lin, J. W. 2016. “Taiwan’s semi-presidential system was easy to establish but is difficult to fix: A comparison between the constitutional reform efforts of 1997 and 2015.” Taiwan J. Democracy 12 (2): 39–57.
Lobel, J. 1989. “Emergency power and the decline of liberalism.” Yale Law J. 98 (7): 1385–1433. https://doi.org/10.2307/796748.
Maor, M. 2019. “Deliberate disproportionate policy response: Towards a conceptual turn.” J. Public Policy 41 (1): 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000278.
Maor, M., SK. Raanan, and D. Chinitz. 2020. “When COVID-19, constitutional crisis, and political deadlock meet: The Israeli case from a disproportionate policy perspective.” Policy Soc. 39 (3): 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783792.
Martinez-Martin, N., S. Wieten, D. Magnus, and M. K. Cho. 2020. “Digital contact tracing, privacy, and public health.” Hastings Center Rep. 50 (3): 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1131.
Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2020. “Combined the ‘entry quarantine system’ and ‘digital fencing tracking system’ and utilize mobile positioning to monitor movement of individuals.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://covid19.mohw.gov.tw/en/cp-4868-53887-206.html.
Morley, J., J. Cowls, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi. 2020. “Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.” Accessed May 28, 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01578-0?proof=t%2Btarget%3D.
Nardin, T. 2008. “Emergency logic: Prudence, morality and the rule of law.” In Emergencies and the limits of legality, edited by V. Ramraj, 97–117. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
NCHC (National Center for High-Performance Computing). 2021. “COVID-19 dashboard.” Accessed May 30, 2020. https://covid-19.nchc.org.tw/index.php.
Public Warning Cell Broadcast Service. 2020. “CBE website.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://cbe.tw/history/.
Ramraj, V. 2008. “No doctrine more pernicious? Emergencies and the limits of legality.” In Emergencies and the limits of legality, edited by V. Ramraj, 3–30. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Relyea, H. C. 2001. “National emergency powers.” In CRS report for Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
Roach, K. 2008. “Ordinary laws for emergencies and democratic derogations from rights.” In Emergencies and the limits of legality, edited by V. Ramraj, 229–257. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
RTI. 2020. “Johnny Chiang suggests to issue emergency decree.” Accessed May 10, 2021. https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2055977.
Sandvik, K. B. 2020. “Smittestopp: If you want your freedom back, download now.” Big Data & Soc. 7 (2): 2053951720939985. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720939985.
Shen, Y. C. 2011. “Semi-presidentialism in Taiwan a shadow of the constitution of the Weimar Republic.” Taiwan J. Democracy 7 (1): 135–152.
Smith, G. P., II. 2009. “Re-shaping the common good in times of public health emergencies: Validating medical triage.” Ann. Health Law 18 (1): 1–34.
Taiwan Today. 2020. “FAQ: Taiwan’s 14-day quarantine requirements.” Accessed May 20, 2020. https://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=2,6,10,15,18&post=173589.
Tsai, T. J. 1999. “A preliminary discussion on the principle of proportionality in public law-focusing on the development of German law.” Chengchi Law Rev. 62: 75–103.
Tsakyrakis, S. 2009. “Proportionality: An assault on human rights?” Int. J. Constitutional Law 7 (3): 468–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop011.
Woodhams, S. 2020. “COVID-19 digital rights tracker.” Accessed June 15, 2021. https://www.top10vpn.com/research/covid-19-digital-rights-tracker/.
Yang, W. Y., and C. H. Tsai. 2020. “Democratic values, collective security, and privacy: Taiwan people’s response to COVID-19.” Asian J. Public Opin. Res. 8 (3): 222–245.
Ye, J. C. 2020. “The role of health: Technology and information in a global public health emergency: Practice and implications from the COVID-19 pandemic.” JMIR Med. Inf. 8 (7): e19866. https://doi.org/10.2196/19866.
Yeh, J. R. 2010. “Presidential politics and the judicial facilitation of dialogue between political actors in new Asian democracies: Comparing the South Korean and Taiwanese experiences.” Int. J. Constitutional Law 8 (4): 911–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 23Issue 1February 2022

History

Received: Nov 29, 2020
Accepted: Sep 8, 2021
Published online: Sep 30, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Political Science, Soochow Univ., 70 Linxi Rd., Taipei City 111, Taiwan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3280-9237. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Law, Chinese Culture Univ., 55, Hwa-Kang Rd., Taipei City 111, Taiwan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8754-0381

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share