Effect of Source Materials and Sand-to-Binder Ratio on Durability Performance and Microstructural Changes of Geopolymer Mortar Subjected to Sulfate and Acid Environment
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 11
Abstract
This study investigated the durability performance and microstructural changes of fly ash–ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)-based geopolymer mortar (GPM) made with different sand-to-binder () ratios and subjected to sulfate and acid environments. The durability performance of GPM in terms of visual observation, change in weight, and change in compressive strength was investigated after exposure to 6% , 6% , , and solutions for a period of 26 weeks. The weight gain percentage of the GPM mixes exposed to sulfate solutions decreased with an increase in GGBS content, whereas the weight loss percentage of the mixes exposed to acid solutions increased with an increase in GGBS content and ratio. GPM made with lower GGBS content, i.e., 15%, had the maximum gain and the minimum loss in compressive strength when exposed to sulfate and acid solutions, respectively, which is in line with the variations in peak intensity of aluminosilicate gels from X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and elemental ratios obtained from energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. GPM mixes made with a higher ratio (2.5) performed better in offsetting the loss in compressive strength in sulfate and acidic environments. The results of XRD, EDS, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) analyses showed more formation of gypsum in GPM made with a higher GGBS content when exposed to sulfate and solutions. The atomic Na/Si ratio, Al/Si ratio, and Ca/Si ratio obtained from EDS analysis indicated comparatively better stability of geopolymer gels in the mortar made with lower GGBS content when exposed to acid solutions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Central Instruments Facility (CIF) of the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati for carrying out the microstructure analysis of geopolymer mortar samples presented in the manuscript.
References
Aiken, T. A., J. Kwasny, W. Sha, and M. N. Soutsos. 2018. “Effect of slag content and activator dosage on the resistance of fly ash geopolymer binders to sulfuric acid attack.” Cem. Concr. Res. 111 (Sep): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.011.
ASTM. 2019. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM C618-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. ASTM C1585-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bakharev, T. 2005a. “Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (6): 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002.
Bakharev, T. 2005b. “Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (4): 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005.
Bascarevic, Z., M. Komljenovic, Z. Miladinovic, V. Nikolic, N. Marjanovic, and R. Petrovic. 2015. “Impact of sodium sulfate solution on mechanical properties and structure of fly ash based geopolymers.” Mater. Struct. 48 (May): 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0325-4.
Ben Haha, M., G. Le Saout, F. Winnefeld, and B. Lothenbach. 2011. “Influence of activator type on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of alkali activated blast-furnace slags.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (3): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.016.
Deb, P. S., P. K. Sarker, and S. Barbhuiya. 2016. “Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 72 (Sep): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.017.
Dzunuzovic, N., M. Komljenovic, V. Nikolic, and T. Ivanovic. 2017. “External sulfate attack on alkali-activated fly ash-blast furnace slag composite.” Constr. Build. Mater. 157 (Dec): 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.159.
Elyamany, H. E., A. E. M. A. Elmoaty, and A. M. Elshaboury. 2018. “Magnesium sulfate resistance of geopolymer mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater. 184 (Sep): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.212.
Gopalakrishnan, R., and K. Chinnaraju. 2019. “Durability of ambient cured alumina silicate concrete based on slag/fly ash blends against sulfate environment.” Constr. Build. Mater. 204 (Feb): 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.153.
Hassan, A., M. Arif, and M. Shariq. 2019. “Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment—A review of mechanical properties and microstructure.” J. Cleaner Prod. 223 (Jun): 704–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.051.
Hossain, M. M., M. R. Karim, M. M. A. Elahi, and M. F. M. Zain. 2020. “Water absorption and sorptivity of alkali-activated ternary blended composite binder.” J. Build. Eng. 31 (Sep): 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101370.
Ismail, I., S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, R. San Nicolas, S. Hamdan, and J. S. J. van Deventer. 2014. “Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 45 (Jan): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.006.
Karakoc, M. B., I. Turkmen, M. M. Maras, F. Kantarci, and R. Demirboga. 2016. “Sulfate resistance of ferrochrome slag based geopolymer concrete.” Ceram. Int. 42 (1): 1254–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.058.
Kwasny, J., T. A. Aiken, M. N. Soutsos, J. A. McIntosh, and D. J. Cleland. 2018. “Sulfate and acid resistance of lithomarge-based geopolymer mortars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 166 (Mar): 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.129.
Lee, N. K., and H. K. Lee. 2015. “Reactivity and reaction products of alkali-activated, fly ash/slag paste.” Constr. Build. Mater. 81 (Apr): 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.022.
Lee, N. K., and H. K. Lee. 2016. “Influence of the slag content on the chloride and sulfuric acid resistances of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 72 (Sep): 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.004.
Li, N., C. Shi, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, and Y. Liu. 2019. “A review on mixture design methods for geopolymer concrete.” Composites, Part B 178 (Sep): 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107490.
Lloyd, R. R., J. L. Provis, and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 2012. “Acid resistance of inorganic polymer binders. 1. Corrosion rate.” Mater. Struct. 45 (May): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-011-9744-7.
Mehta, A., and R. Siddique. 2017. “Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 146 (Aug): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.077.
Noushini, A., and A. Castel. 2016. “The effect of heat-curing on transport properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 112 (Jun): 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.210.
Prusty, J. K., and B. Pradhan. 2020. “Multi-response optimization using Taguchi-Grey relational analysis for composition of fly ash-ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 241 (Apr): 118049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118049.
Rashidian-Dezfouli, H., and P. R. Rangaraju. 2017. “A comparative study on the durability of geopolymers produced with ground glass fiber, fly ash, and glass-powder in sodium sulfate solution.” Constr. Build. Mater. 153 (Oct): 996–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.139.
Ravikumar, D., S. Peethamparan, and N. Neithalath. 2010. “Structure and strength of NaOH activated concretes containing fly ash or GGBFS as the sole binder.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 32 (6): 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.007.
Ren, J., L. Zhang, and R. San Nicolas. 2021. “Degradation of alkali-activated slag and fly ash mortars under different aggressive acid conditions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (7): 04021140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003713.
Saavedra, W. G. V., D. E. Angulo, and R. Meija de Gutierrez. 2016. “Fly ash slag geopolymer concrete: Resistance to sodium and magnesium sulfate attack.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (12): 04016148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001618.
Saha, S., and C. Rajasekaran. 2017. “Enhancement of the properties of fly ash based geopolymer paste by incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag.” Constr. Build. Mater. 146 (Aug): 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.139.
Vafaei, M., A. Allahverdi, P. Dong, and N. Bassim. 2018. “Acid attack on geopolymer cement mortar based on waste-glass powder and calcium aluminate cement at mild concentration.” Constr. Build. Mater. 193 (Dec): 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.203.
Vafaei, M., A. Allahverdi, P. Dong, N. Bassim, and M. Mahinroosta. 2021. “Resistance of red clay brick waste/phosphorus slag-based geopolymer mortar to acid solutions of mild concentration.” J. Build. Eng. 34 (Feb): 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102066.
Wasim, M., T. D. Ngo, and D. Law. 2021. “A state-of-the-art review on the durability of geopolymer concrete for sustainable structures and infrastructure.” Constr. Build. Mater. 291 (Jul): 123381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123381.
Yazdi, M. A., M. Liebscher, S. Hempel, J. Yang, and V. Mechtcherine. 2018. “Correlation of microstructural and mechanical properties of geopolymers produced from fly ash and slag at room temperature.” Constr. Build. Mater. 191 (Dec): 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.037.
Ye, H., and A. Radlinska. 2016. “Fly ash-slag interaction during alkaline activation: Influence of activators on phase assemblage and microstructure formation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 122 (Sep): 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.099.
Zhang, Z., L. Li, X. Ma, and H. Wang. 2016. “Compositional, microstructural and mechanical properties of ambient condition cured alkali-activated cement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 113 (Jun): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.043.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34 • Issue 11 • November 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 12, 2021
Accepted: Feb 25, 2022
Published online: Aug 19, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 19, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.