Flexural and Shear Performance of Wood Composite Panel with Embedded Cross-Laminations
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 1
Abstract
The structural behavior of an innovative wood-based composite system, manufactured out of southern yellow pine lumber, was studied through destructive experiments. The composite panel system consisted of profiled 34.9-mm-thick surface laminations with precut rectangular grooves and 25.4-mm-thick cross-laminations fitted (embedded/dadoed) into the grooves. The cross-laminations were oriented across the surface layers at a specified repetitive spacing. Given that the 34.9-mm-thick surface laminations were in direct contact with each other in those places where the cross-laminations were absent, the total depth of the panels was 69.9 mm. The flexural and shear performance of this composite system, which is called embedded cross-laminated timber (ECLT), were compared against that of the conventional three-ply cross-laminated timber (CLT) panel with the same thickness. The ECLT panel specimens were expected to perform better than the CLT panel specimens in bending because they have more wood fibers aligned parallel to their neutral axes. The effective bending stiffness () and moment carrying capacity of the two composite systems were obtained by conducting four-point bending tests at a span-to-depth ratio of . The ECLT specimens exhibited an average moment carrying capacity of and of , while the conventional CLT specimens achieved corresponding properties of and , respectively. Also, the effective shear stiffness () and shear force capacity of the composite systems were estimated and measured, respectively, by conducting four-point bending tests at a span-to-depth ratio of . On average, the ECLT specimens resisted the shear force of , while the conventional CLT specimens resisted . The average estimated values of ECLT and CLT were and , respectively. Thus, these study results indicate that the proposed cross-laminated wood composite product might outperform conventional CLT in the major direction under bending.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of USDA, Research, Education, and Economics (REE), Agriculture Research Service (ARS), Administrative and Financial Management (AFM), Financial Management and Accounting Division (FMAD) grants and Agreements Management Branch (GAMB) under Agreement No. 58-0204-6-001 and the McIntire-Stennis project under Accession No. 1014025. This publication is also a contribution of the Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University. The authors also would like to thank Shuqualak Lumber Co., Canfor, and Henkel for providing materials.
References
ANSI/APA. 2020. Standard for performance-rated cross-laminated timber. ANSI/APA PRG 320. Tacoma, WA: APA—The Engineered Wood Association.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes. ASTM D198-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of wood and wood-based materials. ASTM D2395-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baylor, G., and A. M. Harte. 2013. “Finite element modelling of castellated timber I-joists.” Constr. Build. Mater. 47 (Oct): 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.076.
Brandner, R., G. Flatscher, A. Ringhofer, G. Schickhofer, and A. Thiel. 2016. “Cross laminated timber (CLT): Overview and development.” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 74 (3): 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5.
Cao, Y., J. Street, M. Li, and H. Lim. 2019. “Evaluation of the effect of knots on rolling shear strength of cross laminated timber (CLT).” Constr. Build. Mater. 222 (Oct): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.165.
Carvalho, L. F., L. F. Carvalho Jorge, and R. Jerónimo. 2020. “Plug-and-play multistory mass timber buildings: Achievements and potentials.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000394.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2015. Timber structures—Cross laminated timber—Requirements. EN 16351. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Dahlen, J., P. D. Jones, R. D. Seale, and R. Shmulsky. 2014. “Bending strength and stiffness of wide dimension southern pine No. 2 lumber.” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 72 (6): 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-014-0848-y.
Danielsson, H., and P. J. Gustafsson. 2014. “Fracture analysis of glued laminated timber beams with a hole using a 3D cohesive zone model.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 124–125 (Jul): 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.020.
Ferdous, W., Y. Bai, T. D. Ngo, A. Manalo, and P. Mendis. 2019. “New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings: A state-of-the-art review.” Eng. Struct. 183 (Oct): 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.061.
FPInnovations. 2013. CLT handbook US edition. Edited by E. Karacabeyli and B. Douglas, Pointe-Claire, Canada: FPInnovations.
Harte, A. M., and G. Baylor. 2011. “Structural evaluation of castellated timber I-joists.” Eng. Struct. 33 (12): 3748–3754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.011.
Hassan, O. A. B., F. Öberg, and E. Gezelius. 2019. “Cross-laminated timber flooring and concrete slab flooring: A comparative study of structural design, economic and environmental consequences.” J. Build. Eng. 26 (Apr): 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100881.
Henkel. 2018. Technical data sheet LOCTITE HB X102 PURBOND. Bridgewater, NJ: Henkel.
Koehn, E., and N. K. Datta. 2003. “Quality, environmental, and health and safety management systems for construction engineering.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (5): 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(562).
Kretschmann, D. E. 2010. “Mechanical properties of wood.” Chap 5 in Wood handbook : Wood as an engineering material, 508. Madison, WI: USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
Kreuzinger, H. 1999. “Platten, scheiben und schalen—Ein berechnungsmodell für gängige statikprogramme.” [In German.] Bauen mit Holz 1 (1): 34–39.
Lacey, A. W., W. Chen, H. Hao, and K. Bi. 2018. “Structural response of modular buildings—An overview.” J. Build. Eng. 16 (July): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.008.
Li, M., W. Dong, and H. Lim. 2019. “Influence of lamination aspect ratios and test methods on rolling shear strength evaluation of cross-laminated timber.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (12): 04019310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002977.
Lim, H., S. Tripathi, and M. Li. 2020a. “Rolling shear modulus and strength of cross-laminated timber treated with micronized copper azole type C (MCA-C).” Constr. Build. Mater. 259 (Jan): 120419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120419.
Lim, H., S. Tripathi, and J. D. Tang. 2020b. “Bonding performance of adhesive systems for cross-laminated timber treated with micronized copper azole type C (MCA-C).” Constr. Build. Mater. 232 (Jan): 117208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117208.
Loss, C., and B. Davison. 2017. “Innovative composite steel-timber floors with prefabricated modular components.” Eng. Struct. 132 (Feb): 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.062.
Loss, C., and A. Frangi. 2017. “Experimental investigation on in-plane stiffness and strength of innovative steel-timber hybrid floor diaphragms.” Eng. Struct. 138 (May): 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.032.
Loss, C., M. Piazza, and R. Zandonini. 2016a. “Connections for steel–timber hybrid prefabricated buildings. Part I: Experimental tests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 122 (Sep): 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.002.
Loss, C., M. Piazza, and R. Zandonini. 2016b. “Connections for steel–timber hybrid prefabricated buildings. Part II: Innovative modular structures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 122 (Sep): 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.001.
Malo, K. A., R. B. Abrahamsen, and M. A. Bjertnæs. 2016. “Some structural design issues of the 14-storey timber framed building ‘Treet’ in Norway.” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 74 (3): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-016-1022-5.
Purbond. 2017. Application instructions: Bonding of SOUTHERN PINE wood with primer LOCTITE PR 3105 and PURBOND HB X adhesives. Sempach Station, Switzerland: Purbond.
Sanders, S. L. 2011. Behavior of interlocking cross-laminated timber (ICLT) shear walls. Provo, UT: Brigham Young Univ.
Sikora, K. S., D. O. McPolin, and A. M. Harte. 2016. “Effects of the thickness of cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Irish Sitka spruce on mechanical performance in bending and shear.” Constr. Build. Mater. 116 (Jul): 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.145.
Uthman, R. N., and R. N. Othman. 2009. Holes in glulam beams-possible methods of reinforcement. Vaxjo, Sweden: Vaxjo Univ.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 27, 2021
Accepted: May 20, 2021
Published online: Oct 26, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.