Surface Stabilization of Soils Susceptible to Wind Erosion Using Volcanic Ash–Based Geopolymer
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 12
Abstract
This study evaluates the surface application of a volcanic ash-based geopolymer for the stabilization of soils susceptible to wind erosion. To achieve this, the mechanical properties of different soil types treated with various geopolymeric mix designs are evaluated using unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests. The effects of volcanic ash (VA) and alkaline activator (AA) on the stabilization of silty sand soil are analyzed for two different curing conditions and over an extended curing period of 3 to 100 days. As different types of nonplastic fine-grained soil are vulnerable to various modes of wind erosion. The effectiveness of the geopolymer in the treatment of different types of nonplastic fine-grained soils (with fines content between 0% and 100%) is assessed through the UCS tests. Furthermore, the mechanical strength of soil samples prepared by three different preparation methods is evaluated. The impact of crust thickness, activator solution quantity, and curing conditions on the erodibility and friction velocity of three different soil types (clean sand, silty sand, and silty soil specimens) are measured by wind tunnel experiments. The results show that treatment with the geopolymer can notably increase the threshold friction velocity and reduce the soil wind erodibility. It is concluded that proper determination of the geopolymer mix design requires consideration of the soil type, maximum wind speed, and ambient conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Arnalds, O., E. F. Thorarinsdottir, J. Thorsson, P. D. Waldhauserova, and A. Maria Agustsdottir. 2013. “An extreme wind erosion event of the fresh Eyjafjallajökull 2010 volcanic ash.” Sci Rep. 3 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01257.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM D1557-12e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis. ASTM D7928-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bushlaibi, A. H., and A. M. Alshamsi. 2002. “Efficiency of curing on partially exposed high-strength concrete in hot climate.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (6): 949–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00735-4.
Chae, S. H., H. Chung, and K. Nam. 2021. “Evaluation of microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) methods on different soil types for wind erosion control.” Environ. Eng. Res. 26 (1): 123–128. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.507.
Chang, C. S., J. Y. Wang, and L. Ge. 2016. “Maximum and minimum void ratios for sand-silt mixtures.” Eng. Geol. 211 (Aug): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.022.
Chen, W., D. Zhibao, L. Zhenshan, and Y. Zuotao. 1996. “Wind tunnel test of the influence of moisture on the erodibility of loessial sandy loam soils by wind.” J. Arid. Environ. 34 (4): 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1996.0119.
Djobo, J. N. Y., A. Elimbi, H. K. Tchakouté, and S. Kumar. 2017. “Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: The current state of the art and perspectives.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (5): 4433–4446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8230-8.
Dow, C., and F. P. Glasser. 2003. “Calcium carbonate efflorescence on Portland cement and building materials.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (1): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00937-7.
Duxson, P., A. Fernández-Jiménez, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, A. Palomo, and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 2007. “Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art.” J. Mater. Sci. 42 (9): 2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.
Fattahi, S. M., A. Soroush, and N. Huang. 2020. “Biocementation control of sand against wind erosion.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (6): 04020045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002268.
Ghadir, P., and N. Ranjbar. 2018. “Clayey soil stabilization using geopolymer and Portland cement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 188 (Nov): 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.207.
Gillette, D. 1978. “A wind tunnel simulation of the erosion of soil: Effect of soil texture, sandblasting, wind speed, and soil consolidation on dust production.” Atmos. Environ. 12 (8): 1735–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90322-0.
Hamdan, N., and E. Kavazanjian. 2016. “Enzyme-induced carbonate mineral precipitation for fugitive dust control.” Géotechnique 66 (7): 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.168.
Hazirbaba, K., and E. M. Rathje. 2009. “Pore pressure generation of silty sands due to induced cyclic shear strains.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1892–1905. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000147.
Kani, E. N., A. Allahverdi, and J. L. Provis. 2012. “Efflorescence control in geopolymer binders based on natural pozzolan.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.07.007.
Katebi, H., A. Fahmi, H. S. Kafil, and M. H. Bonab. 2018. “Stabilization of calcareous sand dunes using phosphoric acid mulching liquid.” J. Arid. Environ. 148 (Jan): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.09.011.
Kok, J. F., E. J. R. Parteli, T. I. Michaels, D. B. Karam, J. F. Kok, E. J. R. Parteli, T. I. Michaels, and B. D. Karam. 2012. “The physics of wind-blown sand and dust.” In Reports on progress in physics, 1–119. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Liew, Y. M., C. Y. Heah, A. B. M. Mustafa, and H. Kamarudin. 2016. “Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review.” Prog. Mater Sci. 83 (Oct): 595–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002.
Middleton, N., and U. Kang. 2017. “Sand and dust storms: Impact mitigation.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 9 (6): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061053.
Mohammadinia, A., M. M. Disfani, D. Conomy, A. Arulrajah, S. Horpibulsuk, and S. Darmawan. 2019. “Utilization of alkali-activated fly ash for construction of deep mixed columns in loose sands.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (10): 04019233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002878.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., J. A. Labrincha, C. Leonelli, A. Palomo, and P. Chindaprasirt. 2014. Handbook of alkali-activated cements, mortars and concretes. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Panikkath, R., C. A. Jumper, and Z. Mulkey. 2013. “Multilobar lung infiltrates after exposure to dust storm: The haboob lung syndrome.” Am. J. Med. 126 (2): e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.08.012.
Ranjbar, N., A. Kashefi, and M. R. Maheri. 2018. “Hot-pressed geopolymer: Dual effects of heat and curing time.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 86 (Nov): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.11.004.
Sargent, P., P. N. Hughes, M. Rouainia, and M. L. White. 2013. “The use of alkali activated waste binders in enhancing the mechanical properties and durability of soft alluvial soils.” Eng. Geol. 152 (1): 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.10.013.
Shao, Y. 2008. Vol. 37 of Physics and modelling of wind erosion, 1689–1699. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Singhi, B., A. I. Laskar, and M. Ali Ahmed. 2016. “Investigation on soil–geopolymer with slag, fly ash and their blending.” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 41 (2): 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1677-y.
Sirjani, E., A. Sameni, A. A. Moosavi, M. Mahmoodabadi, and B. Laurent. 2019. “Portable wind tunnel experiments to study soil erosion by wind and its link to soil properties in the Fars Province, Iran.” Geoderma 333 (Jul): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.012.
Somna, K., C. Jaturapitakkul, P. Kajitvichyanukul, and P. Chindaprasirt. 2011. “NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature.” Fuel 90 (6): 2118–2124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.018.
Tigue, A. A. S., J. R. Dungca, H. Hinode, W. Kurniawan, and M. A. B. Promentilla. 2018. “Synthesis of a one-part geopolymer system for soil stabilizer using fly ash and volcanic ash.” In Vol. 156 of Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 05017. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815605017.
Tingle, J. S., J. Kent Newman, S. L. Larson, C. A. Weiss, and J. F. Rushing. 2007. “Stabilization mechanisms of nontraditional additives.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2 (1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/1989-49.
Tyas, N. M. W., and R. Indawati. 2019. “An overview of acute respiratory infection cases before and after exposure to volcanic ash.” Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi 7 (3): 233. https://doi.org/10.20473/jbe.V7I32019.234-241.
Wilson, T. M., C. Stewart, V. Sword-Daniels, G. S. Leonard, D. M. Johnston, J. W. Cole, J. Wardman, G. Wilson, and S. T. Barnard. 2012. “Volcanic ash impacts on critical infrastructure.” Phys. Chem. Earth 45–46 (Jan): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.06.006.
Yadollahi, M. M., A. Benli, and R. Demirboğa. 2015. “The effects of silica modulus and aging on compressive strength of pumice-based geopolymer composites.” Constr. Build. Mater. 94 (Sep): 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.052.
Yaghoubi, M., A. Arulrajah, M. M. Disfani, S. Horpibulsuk, S. Darmawan, and J. Wang. 2019. “Impact of field conditions on the strength development of a geopolymer stabilized marine clay.” Appl. Clay Sci. 167 (Oct): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.10.005.
Zang, Y. X., W. Gong, H. Xie, B. L. Liu, and H. L. Chen. 2015. “Chemical sand stabilization: A review of material, mechanism, and problems.” Environ. Technol. Rev. 4 (1): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2015.1105307.
Zhang, M., H. Guo, T. El-Korchi, G. Zhang, and M. Tao. 2013. “Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer.” Constr. Build. Mater. 47 (Oct): 1468–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.017.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33 • Issue 12 • December 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 3, 2020
Accepted: Apr 15, 2021
Published online: Sep 23, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Mohammad Jamalimoghadam, Hossein Bahmyari, Freeze–Thaw Characteristics of Slaking Marl Clay Stabilized with a Binder Based on Alkali-Activated Recycled Glass Powder, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15432, 35, 11, (2023).
- Hamid Reza Mohebbi, Akbar A. Javadi, Alireza Saeedi Azizkandi, The Effects of Soil Porosity and Mix Design of Volcanic Ash-Based Geopolymer on the Surface Strength of Highly Wind Erodible Soils, Minerals, 10.3390/min12080984, 12, 8, (984), (2022).