Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of the Parameters Influencing the Shear-Stress Behavior of Interlocking Paver Blocks–Bedding Sand Interface Using Large-Scale Direct Shear Test
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 6
Abstract
Shear strength and rutting characteristics play a vital role in the serviceability and performance of interlocking concrete block pavement (ICBP). The objective of the present research study is to evaluate the shear stress behavior of the interlocking paver block–bedding sand interface using the laboratory large-scale direct shear test. The research includes analyzing the influence of parameters such as interlocking paver block shape, laying angle, and gradation of bedding sand on the shear stress behavior of ICBP. Optimization of the influential parameter is analyzed by the response surface methodology using expert software. The relative movement between the blocks during the shear mechanism is assessed by the image processing technique using well-known mathematical software and is validated from the readings measured using a Vernier caliper. Numerical simulation is carried out using professional engineering software to validate the laboratory test results. Combined rutting of the interlocking paver block and bedding sand is estimated from the derived shear test results. The test results prove that the ICBP, when laid with zigzag shape over Zone II bedding sand, perpendicular to the traffic movement, exhibits better shear strength and lower rutting.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. (MATLAB coding, experimental model, PLAXIS model).
References
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear. ASTM D5321/D5321M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1970. Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. IS 1498. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2006. Precast concrete blocks for paving—Specification. IS 15658. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete—Specification. IS 383. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Bullen, F., and J. Knapton. 1998. “The role of bedding sands fines in segmental pavement instability.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Workshop on Concrete Block Paving, 1–8. Herndon, VA: Small Element Pavement Technologist.
El-Emam, M. M., M. F. Attom, and Z. H. Khan. 2012. “Numerical prediction of plane strain properties of sandy soil from direct shear test.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 6 (1): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.3328/IJGE.2012.06.01.79-90.
Gunatilake, D., and W. K. Mampearachchi. 2017. “Finite element modelling approach to determine optimum dimensions for interlocking concrete blocks used for road paving.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 20 (2): 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1385512.
Hegde, A., and R. Roy. 2018. “A comparative numerical study on soil—Geosynthetic interactions using large scale direct shear test and pullout test.” Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng. 4 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0119-1.
Hossain, A., and J. H. Yin. 2014. “Behavior of a pressure-grouted soil-cement interface in direct shear tests.” Int. J. Geomech. 14 (1): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000301.
Hui, L., D. Jones, R. Wu, and J. T. Harvey. 2014. Development and HVS validation of design tables for permeable interlocking concrete pavement. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, Univ. of California.
Huurman, M., M. Houben, A. A. A. Molenaar, and A. W. M. Kok. 1992. “The shear failure mechanism in concrete block pavements with a sand sub-base only.” Pave 92 (1): 297–307.
ICPI (Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute). 2018. Annual report 2018. Chantilly, VA: ICPI.
Ilori, A. O., N. E. Udoh, and J. I. Umenge. 2017. “Determination of soil shear properties on a soil to concrete interface using a direct shear box apparatus.” Int. J. Geo-Eng. 8 (17). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0055-x.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018a. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. IRC 37. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018b. Guidelines for the use of interlocking concrete block pavement. IRC SP:63. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Knapton, J., and H. M. Algin. 1998. “Research into the structural performance of interlocking pavements.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Workshop on Concrete Block Paving, 1–11. Herndon, VA: Small Element Pavement Technologist.
Lin, W., D. Kim, S. W. Ryu, H. Hao, Y. E. Ge, and Y. H. Cho. 2018. “Evaluation of the load dissipation behavior of concrete block pavements with various block shapes and construction patterns.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 04017291. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002113.
Lok Man, C., and Y. Jian-Hua. 2005. “Comparison of interface shear strength of soil nails measured by both direct shear box tests and pullout tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (9): 1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1097).
Mampearachchi, W. K., and W. P. H. Gunarathna. 2010. “Finite-element model approach to determine support conditions and effective layout for concrete block paving.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 22 (11): 1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000118.
Mampearachchi, W. K., and A. Senadeera. 2014. “Determination of the most effective cement concrete block laying pattern and shape for road pavement based on field performance.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (2): 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000801.
Murat Algin, H. 2007. “Interlock mechanism of concrete block pavements.” J. Transp. Eng. 133 (5): 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:5(318).
Panda, B. C., and A. K. Ghosh. 2001. “Source of joining sand for concrete block pavement.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:3(235).
Panda, B. C., and A. K. Ghosh. 2002a. “Structural behavior of concrete block paving. I: Sand in bed and joints.” J. Transp. Eng. 128 (2): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(123).
Panda, B. C., and A. K. Ghosh. 2002b. “Structural behavior of concrete block paving. II: Concrete blocks.” J. Transp. Eng. 128 (2): 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(130).
Shackel, B. 1984. “The evolution and application of mechanistic design procedures for concrete block pavements.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Concrete Block Paving, 114–120. Herndon, VA: Small Element Pavement Technologist.
Shackel, B., and D. O. O. Lim. 2003. “Mechanisms of paver interlock.” In Proc., 7th Int. Workshop on Concrete Block Paving. Herndon, VA: Small Element Pavement Technologist.
Shakir, R. R., and J. G. Zhu. 2010. “An examination of the mechanical interaction of drilling slurries at the soil-concrete contact.” J. Zhejiang Univ.: Sci. A 11 (4): 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900456.
Soutsos, M. N., K. Tang, H. A. Khalid, and S. G. Millard. 2011. “The effect of construction pattern and unit interlock on the structural behaviour of block pavements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (10): 3832–3840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.002.
Vangla, P., and G. M. Latha. 2015. “Influence of particle size on the friction and interfacial shear strength of sands of similar morphology.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 1 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-014-0008-9.
Yang, P., S. B. Xue, L. Song, and M. S. Duan. 2018. “Interface shear characteristics of dredger fill and concrete using large size direct shear test.” Int. J. Geo-Eng. 9 (1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0081-3.
Yu, Y., I. P. Damians, and R. J. Bathurst. 2015. “Influence of choice of FLAC and PLAXIS interface models on reinforced soil-structure interactions.” Comput. Geotech. 65 (Apr): 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.009.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33 • Issue 6 • June 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 27, 2020
Accepted: Oct 27, 2020
Published online: Mar 24, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.