Feasibility of 9.5-mm Stone Matrix Asphalt for Thin Lift Overlays in Washington State
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 4
Abstract
Due to budget constraints, highway agencies tend to use thin lifts as a primary rehabilitation strategy. The construction of a thin lift requires a small nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS), e.g., 9.5 mm or smaller. However, hot-mix asphalt (HMA) with a small NMAS is prone to rutting and/or studded tire wear. Stone matrix asphalt (SMA) is a gap-graded asphalt mixture with interlocking aggregate that enhances the mixture’s mechanical properties compared with HMA, especially with regard to resistance to both rutting and studded tire wear. Therefore, SMA mixes with a small NMAS may provide a viable solution to these distress types. Few studies have evaluated the performance of small NMAS SMA for thin overlays, especially for high levels of studded tire traffic. To address this gap in the literature, this study assessed the laboratory performance of 9.5-mm NMAS SMA compared with that of commonly used 12.5-mm NMAS SMA and 9.5-mm NMAS HMA mixtures to determine the feasibility of using 9.5-mm NMAS SMA in thin lift overlays subjected to heavy traffic in the State of Washington, where the use of studded tires is widespread in winter. Three types of mixtures were tested for their resistance to bottom-up fatigue cracking, top-down fatigue cracking, thermal cracking, rutting and moisture susceptibility, and studded tire wear. The resistance to top-down fatigue cracking of the 9.5-mm SMA was comparable to that of the 9.5-mm HMA and the 12.5-mm SMA. The 9.5-mm HMA and 9.5-mm SMA had comparable resistance to bottom-up fatigue cracking and performed better than the 12.5-mm SMA. Both the 9.5-mm HMA and the 9.5-mm SMA had better thermal cracking resistance than the 12.5-mm SMA. The 12.5-mm SMA had better rutting and moisture susceptibility resistance than the 9.5-mm SMA and 9.5-mm HMA. Both the 9.5-mm SMA and 12.5-mm SMA had comparable resistance to studded tire wear and performed better than the 9.5-mm HMA. Overall, the results showed that 9.5-mm NMAS SMA is a viable material for thin-lift overlays, outperforming 9.5-mm NMAS HMA in terms of resistance to rutting, moisture, and studded tire wear. Further studies are needed to assess the field performance, constructability, and life-cycle costs of 9.5-mm SMA.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some data, including test data and analysis results, that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some data, including those regarding the fiber and fly ash used in this study, were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider indicated in the Acknowledgements.
Acknowledgments
The asphalt binder was supplied by Idaho Asphalt, and the cellulose fibers were provided by JRS USA. The authors appreciate their support.
References
AASHTO. 2000. Standard specification for designing stone matrix asphalt (SMA). Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013. Standard method of test for materials finer than 75-μm (No. 200) sieve in mineral aggregates by washing. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014a. Standard method of test for determination of draindown characteristics in uncompacted asphalt mixtures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014b. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted asphalt mixtures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. Standard practice for Superpave volumetric design for asphalt mixtures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Allen, L. C., and E. R. Brown. 2001. “Potential of using stone matrix asphalt for thin overlays.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1749 (1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.3141/1749-07.
Asi, I. M. 2006. “Laboratory comparison study for the use of stone matrix asphalt in hot weather climates.” Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (10): 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.011.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of bituminous mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Behnood, A., and M. Ameri. 2012. “Experimental investigation of stone matrix asphalt mixtures containing steel slag.” Sci. Iranica 19 (5): 1214–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.07.007.
Bhasin, A., J. W. Button, A. Chowdhury, and E. Masad. 2006. “Selection of optimum gravel aggregate size to resist permanent deformation in hot-mix asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1952 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106195200105.
Blazejowski, K. 2016. Stone matrix asphalt: Theory and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Brown, E. 1993. Experience with stone matrix asphalt in the United States. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
Brown, E. R. 2004. Relationship of air voids, lift thickness, and permeability in hot mix asphalt pavements. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Chen, D. H., and T. Scullion. 2015. “Very thin overlays in Texas.” Constr. Build. Mater. 95 (Oct): 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.157.
Cooley, L. A., and G. C. Hurley. 2004. Potential of using stone matrix asphalt (SMA) in Mississippi. Auburn, AL: Auburn Univ.
GDOT (Georgia Department of Transportation). 2001. Section 400—Hot mix asphaltic concrete construction. Atlanta: GDOT.
Hajj, R., A. Filonzi, A. Bhasin, A. Dormohammadi, C. Zhu, and V. Tandon. 2018. Design and construction of ultra thin overlays as an alternative to seal coats. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Kandhal, P. 2004. “Asphalt pavements mitigate tire/pavement noise.” Hot Mix Asphalt Technol. 9 (2): 22–31.
Kim, Y. R., C. Castorena, M. D. Elwardany, F. Y. Rad, S. Underwood, G. Akshay, P. Gudipudi, M. J. Farrar, and R. R. Glaser. 2018. Long-term aging of asphalt mixtures for performance testing and prediction. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kowalski, K. J., R. S. McDaniel, A. Shah, and J. Olek. 2009. “Long-term monitoring of noise and frictional properties of three pavements: Dense-graded asphalt, stone matrix asphalt, and porous friction course.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2127 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2127-02.
MDOT (Maryland Department of Transportation). 2019. Standard specification for construction and materials. Baltimore: MDOT.
Michael, L., G. Burke, and C. Schwartz. 2003. “Performance of stone matrix asphalt pavements in Maryland.” Asphalt Paving Technol. 72 (1): 287–314.
NAPA (National Asphalt Pavement Association). 2002. Designing and constructing SMA mixtures: State of the practice. Atlanta: NAPA.
NAPA (National Asphalt Pavement Association). 2018. Advances in the design, production, & construction of stone matrix (mastic) asphalt. Atlanta: NAPA.
Newcomb, D. E. 2009. Thin asphalt overlays for pavement preservation. Atlanta: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
Prowell, B. D., D. E. Watson, G. C. Hurley, and E. Brown. 2010. “Evaluation of stone matrix asphalt (SMA) for airfield pavements.” In Proc., FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conf. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
Putman, B. J., and S. N. Amirkhanian. 2004. “Utilization of waste fibers in stone matrix asphalt mixtures.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 42 (3): 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.005.
Rungruangvirojn, P., and K. Kanitpong. 2010. “Measurement of visibility loss due to splash and spray: Porous, SMA and conventional asphalt pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 11 (6): 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430903578945.
Son, S., I. L. Al-Qadi, and T. G. Zehr. 2013. “Rutting potential of thin and durable asphalt wearing courses: Laboratory prediction and field performance.” In Airfield and highway pavement 2013: Sustainable and efficient pavements, 1240–1253. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413005.105.
Titus-Glover, L., H. L. Von Quintus, K. L. Smith, M. Stanley, and S. Rao. 2006. Life-cycle cost analysis of SMA pavements and SMA application guidelines. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Highway Research Program.
Watson, D. E., E. Masad, K. A. Moore, K. Williams, and L. A. Cooley. 2004. “Verification of voids in coarse aggregate testing: Determining stone-on-stone contact of hot-mix asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1891 (1): 182–190. https://doi.org/10.3141/1891-21.
Wen, H. 2013. “Use of fracture work density obtained from indirect tensile testing for the mix design and development of a fatigue model.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (6): 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2012.729060.
Wen, H., and S. Bhusal. 2014. “Toward development of asphaltic materials to resist studded tire wear.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2446 (1): 78–88. https://doi.org/10.3141/2446-09.
Wen, H., S. Wu, L. N. Mohammad, W. Zhang, S. Shen, and A. Faheem. 2016. “Long-term field rutting and moisture susceptibility performance of warm-mix asphalt pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2575 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2575-11.
WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2012. Estimate of studded tire damage to asphalt pavements. Washington, DC: WSDOT.
WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2018. Contract provisions and plans for construction of I-90: SR21—Ritzville. Washington, DC: WSDOT.
WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2019. Standard specifications for road, bridge, and municipal construction. Washington, DC: WSDOT.
Wu, S., H. Wen, W. Zhang, S. Shen, A. Faheem, and L. N. Mohammad. 2016. “Long-term field transverse cracking performance of warm-mix asphalt pavement and its significant material property.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2576 (1): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.3141/2576-12.
Zhang, K., A. Muftah, H. Wen, F. Bayomy, and M. Santi. 2016. “Performance-related design method for asphalt mixes that contain reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP).” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33 • Issue 4 • April 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 20, 2019
Accepted: Sep 4, 2020
Published online: Jan 29, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 29, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.