Investigation into Locking Point of Asphalt Mixtures Utilizing Superpave and Marshall Compactors
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 9
Abstract
Locking point is an important concept in selecting a proper aggregate gradation in the asphalt mixture design. The locking point can be defined as the moment during asphalt mixture compaction at which an aggregate structure becomes stable. Beyond this point, further compaction does not contribute much to the increase in mixture density and can even damage aggregate particles. This study employed two compaction methods, a Superpave Gyratory Compactor and a Marshall Compactor, to investigate the locking points of different asphalt mixtures. For the Marshall compaction method, an accelerometer was attached to the Marshall Hammer to record the response of the asphalt mixtures. For the Superpave gyratory compaction, changes in the height and density of the compacted samples were utilized to determine locking points. A total of ten mixtures was designed and evaluated. All the mixtures were prepared with the same asphalt binder PG 64-22 and aggregates. The aggregates were prescreened by different sieves to control variability in gradation. The results of this study show that it is feasible to determine the locking point for most of the mixtures with an accelerometer. The one exception was the largest aggregate, which experienced particle breakage during compaction. The locking point was found to be dependent on the full range of aggregate sizes of a mixture. Stone mastic asphalt (SMA) mixtures with similar gradation in fine particles showed less variability in locking point. Dense-graded mixtures with smaller maximum aggregate size exhibited lower locking points. These results can be attributed to their higher asphalt content, which served as a lubricant. The 101.6-mm (4-in.) Marshall mold was not adequate for determining the locking point for the mixtures with particles larger than 25.4 mm (1 in.).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. 2007. Sampling of aggregates. AASHTO T2. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Anderson, R. M., P. A. Turner, and R. L. Peterson. 2002. Relationship of Superpave gyratory compaction properties to HMA rutting behavior. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.
Asphalt Institute. 2007. The asphalt handbook MS-4. 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
Bahia, H., T. Friemel, P. Peterson, J. Russel, and B. Poehnelt. 1998. “Optimization of constructibility and resistance to traffic: A new design approach for HMA using the Superpave compactor.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 67: 189–232.
Georgia Department of Transportation. 2013. Standard specifications construction of transportation systems. Atlanta: Georgia Dept. of Transportation.
Hall, K., S. Dandu, and G. Gowda. 1996. “Effect of specimen size on compaction and volumetric properties in gyratory compacted hot-mix asphalt concrete specimens.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1545: 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196154500117.
Jackson, N., and L. Czor. 2003. “100-mm-diameter mold used with Superpave Gyratory Compactor.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 15 (1): 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(60).
Leiva, F., and R. West. 2008. “Analysis of hot-mix asphalt lab compactability using lab compaction parameters and mix characteristics.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2057: 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3141/2057-11.
Mallick, R. 1999. “Use of Superpave Gyratory Compactor to characterize hot-mixture asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1681: 86–96. https://doi.org/10.3141/1681-11.
McGennis, R., R. Anderson, D. Perdomo, and P. Turner. 1996. “Issues pertaining to use of Superpave Gyratory Compactor.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1543: 139–144. https://doi.org/10.3141/1543-18.
Mohammad, L., and K. Shamsi. 2007. “A look at the Bailey method and locking point concept in Superpave mixture design.” In Transportation research circular E-C124: Practical approaches to hot-mix asphalt mix design and production quality control testing, 12–32. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Polaczyk, P., B. Han, B. Huang, and X. JiaShu. 2018. “Evaluation of the hot mix asphalt compactability utilizing the impact compaction method.” Constr. Build. Mater. 187: 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.117.
Roberts, F. L., L. Mohammad, and L. Wang. 2002. “History of hot mix asphalt mixture design in the United States.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 14 (4): 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:4(279).
Tennessee Department of Transportation. 2015. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Springfield, IL: Creasey Printing Services.
Transportation Research Board. 2002. Method summarized for gradation selection in hot-mix asphalt design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Vavrik, W., and S. Carpenter. 1998. “Calculating air voids at specified number of gyrations in Superpave Gyratory Compactor.” J. Transp. Res. Board 1630 (1): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.3141/1681-11.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 18, 2018
Accepted: Mar 28, 2019
Published online: Jun 19, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 19, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.