Shear Properties of Stabilized Loess Using Novel Reactive Magnesia-Bearing Binders
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 5
Abstract
Loess stabilization is an effective approach to solve the deformation and subsidence problems in loess areas. Unconsolidated-undrained direct shear tests were conducted to investigate the improving effect of reactive MgO and MgO fly ash on the shear properties of loess, taking into account four major controlling factors, including MgO amount, curing time, moisture content, and compaction degree. Based on the test results, both the cohesion and internal friction angle of solidified loess achieve a peak at 6% MgO or 14-day curing time. The augment of water content accounts for the enhancement of cohesion before the optimum moisture content is reached, with a drop following afterward, while the friction angle decreases continuously. As the compaction degree grows, the cohesion and friction angle display escalating trends. It is suggested that the following optimum parameters from the viewpoint of shear performance be adopted for construction practices, i.e., 6% MgO content, 14-day curing, optimum water content, and 96% compaction degree. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTA), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) were implemented to explore the microstructure and stabilization mechanisms. The major hydration products of MgO, MgO fly ash, and portland cement–stabilized loess are identified as brucite, magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H) plus brucite, and calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), respectively. Loess stabilized with reactive MgO-bearing materials has a higher hydration degree and better pore distribution than portland cement–stabilized loess. Reactive MgO and MgO fly ash outperform traditional portland cement (PC) in terms of shear property and microstructure. The MgO fly ash blends elucidate a positive effect on strength gain and decrease in large-size pores.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51879202 and 51609180).
References
Al-Tabbaa, A. 2013. “Reactive magnesia cement. Part 4.” Chap. 19 in Eco-efficient concrete, edited by F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali, J. Labrinacha, and V. M. John. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
ASTM. 2005. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM C618. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Ben Haha, M., G. L. Saout, F. Winnefeld, and B. Lothenbach. 2011. “Influence of activator type on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of alkali activated blast-furnace slags.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (3): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.016.
Bernal, S. A., R. S. Nicolas, R. J. Myers, R. M. de Gurierrez, F. Puertas, J. S. J. van Deventer, and J. L. Provis. 2014. “MgO content of slag controls phase evolution and structural changes induced by accelerated carbonation in alkali-activated binders.” Cem. Concr. Res. 57: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.003.
Cai, G. H., S. Y. Liu, Y. J. Du, and J. J. Cao. 2017. “Influences of activity index on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of carbonated reactive magnesia-admixed silty soil.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (5): 04016285. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001787.
Chinese Standards. 2007. Test methods of soils for highway engineering. JTG E40-2007. Beijing: Chinese Standards.
Consoli, N. C., D. A. Rosa, R. C. Cruz, and A. D. Rosa. 2011. “Water content, porosity and cement content as parameters controlling strength of artificially cemented silty soil.” Eng. Geol. 122 (3–4): 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.05.017.
Cwirzen, A., and K. Habermehl-Cwirzen. 2013. “Effects of reactive magnesia on microstructure and frost durability of portland cement-based binders.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (12): 1941–1950. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000768.
Du, Y. J., G. H. Cai, S. Y. Liu, D. W. Zhang, and X. Zheng. 2015. “Strength and deformation characteristics of carbonated reactive magnesia treated silt soil.” [In Chinese.] J. Central South Uni. 22 (5): 1859–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2705-5.
Garcia, M. A., J. M. Chimenos, A. I. Fernandez, L. Miralles, M. Segarra, and F. Espiell. 2004. “Low-grade MgO used to stabilise heavy metals in highly contaminated soils.” Chemosphere 56 (5): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.04.005.
Harrison, J. 2003. “New cements based on the addition of reactive magnesia to portland cement with or without added pozzolan.” In Proc., CIA Conf.: Concrete in the 3rd Millennium 2003. Brisbane, Australia: CIA.
He, Z. Q., H. H. Fan, J. Q. Wang, G. Liu, Z. N. Wang, and J. H. Yu. 2017. “Experimental study of engineering properties of loess reinforced by lignosulfonate.” [In Chinese.] Rock Soil Mech. 38 (3): 731–739. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2017.03.015.
Higgins, D., L. Sear, D. King, B. Price, R. Barnes, and C. Clear. 2011. Cementitious materials: The effect of GGBS, fly ash, silica fume and limestone fines on properties of concrete. Camberley, UK: Concrete Society.
Horpibulsuk, S., R. Rachan, A. Chinkultkjniwat, Y. Raksachon, and A. Suddeepong. 2010. “Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilised silty clay from microstructural considerations.” Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (10): 2011–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.011.
Lee, N. K., K. T. Koh, M. O. Kim, G. H. An, and G. S. Ryu. 2017. “Physicochemical changes caused by reactive MgO in alkali-activated fly ash/slag blends under accelerated carbonation.” Ceram. Int. 43 (15): 12490–12496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.119.
Liska, M. 2009. “Properties and applications of reactive magnesia cements in porous blocks.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge.
Liu, S. Y., G. H. Cai, Y. J. Du, H. Zhu, and P. Wang. 2017. “Engineering properties of carbonated reactive magnesia-stabilised silt under different activity index.” Procedia Eng. 189: 158–165.
Liu, T. S. 1985. Loess and the environment, 1–381. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Science Press.
Liu, Z., C. S. Cai, F. Y. Liu, and F. H. Fan. 2016. “Feasibility study of loess stabilization with fly ash-based geopolymer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (5): 04016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001490.
Panesar, D. K., and L. Mo. 2013. “Properties of binary and ternary reactive MgO mortar blends subjected to curing.” Cem. Concr. Comp. 38: 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.009.
Pei, X. J., F. Y. Zhang, W. J. Wu, and S. Y. Liang. 2015. “Physicochemical and index properties of loess stabilized with lime and fly ash piles.” Appl. Clay Sci. 114: 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.007.
Peng, Y., H. Y. Zhang, C. B. Lin, X. W. Wang, and L. Yang. 2017. “Engineering properties and improvement mechanism of loess soil modified by consolid system.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 36 (3): 762–772. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.1782.
Shear, D. L., H. W. Olsen, and K. R. Nelson. 1933. “Effects of desiccation on the hydraulic conductivity versus void ratio relationship for a natural clay.” In Transportation research record, 1365–1370. Washington, DC: NRC, National Academy Press.
Suhendro, B. 2014. “Toward green concrete for better sustainable environment.” Procedia Eng. 95: 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.190.
Tabarsa, A., N. Latifi, C. L. Meehan, and K. N. Manahiloh. 2018. “Laboratory investigation and field evaluation of loess improvement using nanoclay—A sustainable material for construction.” Constr. Build. Mater. 158: 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.096.
Vandeperre, L. J., M. Liska, and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2008. “Microstructures of reactive magnesia cement blends.” Cem. Concr. Comp. 30 (8): 706–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.05.002.
Wang, D. X., H. W. Wang, and S. J. Di. 2018. “Mechanical properties and microstructure of magnesia–fly ash pastes.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1439400.
Wang, D. X., H. W. Wang, and Y. Z. Jiang. 2019. “Water immersion-induced strength performance of solidified soils with reactive MgO—A green and low carbon binder.” J. Test. Eval. 47 (2): JTE20170098. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170098.
Wang, D. X., H. W. Wang, and X. Q. Wang. 2017. “Compressibility and strength behavior of marine soils solidified with MgO—A green and low carbon binder.” Mar. Georesour. Geotec. 35 (6): 878–886.
Wang, F., F. Jin, Z. T. Shen, and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2016. “Three-year performance of in-situ mass stabilised contaminated site soils using MgO-bearing binders.” J. Hazard. Mater. 318: 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.018.
Yi, Y. L., X. Zheng, S. Y. Liu, and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2015. “Comparison of reactive magnesia- and carbide slag-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag and portland cement for stabilisation of a natural soil.” Appl. Clay Sci. 111: 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.023.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 31 • Issue 5 • May 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 24, 2018
Accepted: Oct 3, 2018
Published online: Feb 28, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.