Technical Papers
Apr 24, 2018

Minimum Virgin Binder Content Needed in Recycled Superpave Mixtures to Resist Fatigue Cracking and Moisture Damage

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 7

Abstract

Use of recycled materials such as recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) in hot-mix asphalt (HMA) is common now due to their economy and sustainability. However, the effects of RAP and RAS on mixture performance are not fully known. In this research, three recycled Superpave mixture with 9.5 and 19 mm nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) were studied as control mixtures. Binder grades in mixtures containing higher percentages of recycled materials (RAP and RAS) were established using a blending chart. Nine laboratory-designed mixtures with different virgin binder contents were evaluated for potential early fatigue cracking using the dynamic modulus and simplified viscoelastic continuum damage direct tension fatigue tests. Moisture susceptibility of the mixtures was evaluated using the Hamburg wheel tracking and modified Lottman tests. Decreased virgin binder content resulted in inferior moisture and rutting performance for 9.5-mm mixtures. Similar fatigue performance was predicted for the mixtures made with the same source of materials regardless of NMAS. In general, mixtures with virgin binder content of 65% of total effective asphalt content and higher showed better performance properties.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Kansas Department of Transportation for sponsoring this study.

References

AASHTO. 2007. Resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO TP283. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013a. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). AASHTO TP79. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013b. Standard specification for Superpave volumetric mix design. AASHTO M323. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. Standard method of test for determining the damage characteristics curve of asphalt mixtures from direct tension cyclic fatigue test. AASHTO TP107. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2015. Standard specification for reclaimed asphalt shingles for use in asphalt mixtures. AASHTO MP23. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ahmed, A. 2015. “Evaluation of cracking potential of Superpave mixtures with high reclaimed asphalt pavement content.” Master’s thesis, Kansas State Univ.
Al-Qadi, I. L., Q. Aurangzeb, S. H. Carpenter, W. J. Pine, and J. Trepanier. 2012. Impact of high RAP contents on structural and performance properties of asphalt mixtures. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Aschenbrener, T. 1994. Influence of refining processes and crude oil sources used in Colorado on results from the Hamburg wheel-tracking device. Denver, CO: Colorado Dept. of Transportation.
Brown, E. R., P. S. Kandhal, F. L. Roberts, Y. R. Kim, D. Lee, and T. W. Kennedy. 2009. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction. Lanham, MD: NAPA Research and Education Foundation.
Cascione, A. A., R. C. Williams, W. G. Buttlar, S. Ahmed, B. Hill, D. S. Haugen, and S. Gillen. 2011. “Laboratory evaluation of field produced hot mix asphalt containing post-consumer recycled asphalt shingles and fractionated recycled asphalt pavement.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 80: 377–418.
Copeland, A. 2011. Reclaimed asphalt pavement in asphalt mixtures: State of the practice. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Daniel, J., and A. Lachance. 2005. “Mechanistic and volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures with recycled asphalt pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1929: 28–36.
Foxlow, J. J., J. Sias Daniel, and A. Krishna Swamy. 2011. “RAP or RAS? The differences in performance of HMA containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and reclaimed asphalt shingles.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 80: 347–373.
Kansas Department of Transportation. 2004. Resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture induced damage, Kansas standard test method. KT-56. Topeka, KS: Kansas Dept. of Transportation.
Kim, Y. R., H. Lee, and D. N. Little. 1997. “Fatigue characterization of asphalt concrete using viscoelasticity and continuum damage theory (with discussion).” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 66: 520–569.
Li, X., T. R. Clyne, and M. O. Marasteanu. 2004. “Recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) effects on binder and mixture quality.”. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Little, D. N., A. Bhasin, and M. K. Darabi. 2015. “Damage healing in asphalt pavements: Theory, mechanisms, measurement, and modeling.” In Advances in asphalt materials, edited by S. Huang and H. D. Benedetto, 205–242. Oxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Newcomb, D., M. Stroup-Gardiner, B. Weikle, and A. Drescher. 1993. Influence of roofing shingles on asphalt concrete mixture properties. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Ozer, H., I. Al-Qadi, A. Kanaan, and D. Lippert. 2013. “Performance characterization of asphalt mixtures at high asphalt binder replacement with recycled asphalt shingles.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2371: 105–112.
Ozer, H., I. L. Al-Qadi, and A. Kanaan. 2012. “Laboratory evaluation of high asphalt binder replacement with recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) for a low N-design asphalt mixture. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Palvadi, S., A. Bhasin, A. Motamed, and D. N. Little. 2012. “Quantifying healing based on viscoelastic continuum damage theory in fine aggregate asphalt specimen.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 7th RILEM Int. Conf. on Cracking in Pavements, 1115–1123. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Pellinen, T. K., S. Xiao, and S. Y. Raval. 2006. “Dynamic modulus testing of thin pavement cores.” J. ASTM Int. 3 (4): 1–14.
Rahman, F. 2010. “Performance evaluation of 4.75-mm NMAS Superpave mixture.” Ph.D. dissertation, Kansas State Univ.
Sabahfar, N., A. Ahmed, S. R. Aziz, and M. Hossain. 2016. “Cracking resistance evaluation of mixtures with high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (4): 06016022.
Sabahfer, N., and M. Hossain. 2015. “Effect of fractionation of reclaimed asphalt pavement on properties of Superpave mixtures with reclaimed asphalt pavement.” Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater. 4 (1): 47–60.
Samoo, F. A. 2011. “Initial performance assessment for implementation of hot mix asphalt containing recycled asphalt shingles in Oregon.” Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State Univ.
Schapery, R. A. 1975. “A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media.” Int. J. Fract. 11 (4): 549–562.
Shafiei, A., and M. Latifi Namin. 2014. “Experimental investigation on the effect of hydrated lime on mechanical properties of SMA.” Supplement, Constr. Build. Mater. 70 (SC): 379–387.
Shu, X., B. Huang, and D. Vukosavljevic. 2008. “Laboratory evaluation of fatigue characteristics of recycled asphalt mixture.” Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (7): 1323–1330.
Sondag, M. S., B. A. Chadbourn, and A. Drescher. 2002. Investigation of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) mixtures. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Stuart, K. D., and W. S. Mogawer. 1997. “Effect of compaction method on rutting susceptibility measured by wheel-tracking devices.” In 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Texas Department of Transportation. 2014. Test procedure for Hamburg wheel tracking test. Tex-242-F. Austin, TX.
Uppu, K. K. 2012. “Durable Superpave hot-mix asphalt mixes in Kansas.” Master’s thesis, Kansas State Univ.
Visintine, B. 2011. “An investigation of various percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement on the performance of asphalt pavements.” Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ.
Williams, R. C., A. Cascione, D. S. Haugen, W. G. Buttlar, R. A. Bentsen, and J. Behnke. 2011. Characterization of hot mix asphalt containing post-consumer recycled asphalt shingles and fractionated reclaimed asphalt pavement. Downers Grove, IL: Illinois State Toll Highway Authority.
Williams, R. C., A. A. Cascione, J. Yu, D. Haugen, M. Marasteanu, and J. McGraw. 2013. Performance of recycled asphalt shingles in hot mix asphalt. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Witczak, M. W. 2005. Simple performance tests: Summary of recommended methods and database. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wu, S., K. Zhang, H. Wen, J. DeVol, and K. Kelsey. 2015. “Performance evaluation of hot mix asphalt containing recycled asphalt shingles in Washington State.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (1): 04015088.
Xie, Z., J. Shen, M. Earnest, B. Li, and M. Jackson. 2014. “Fatigue performance evaluation of porous European mix (PEM) with crumb rubber modified binders using simplified viscoelastic continuum damage model.” In 94th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Yildirim, Y., P. W. Jayawickrama, M. S. Hossain, A. Alhabshi, S. A. Cenk Yildirim, and D. Little. 2007. Hamburg wheel-tracking database analysis. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Zhao, S., B. Bowers, B. Huang, and X. Shu. 2013. “Characterizing rheological properties of binder and blending efficiency of asphalt paving mixtures containing RAS through GPC.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (5): 941–946.
Zhao, S., B. Huang, X. Shu, X. Jia, and M. Woods. 2012. “Laboratory performance evaluation of warm-mix asphalt containing high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2294: 98–105.
Zhou, F., J. W. Button, and J. A. Epps. 2012. Best practice of using RAS in HMA. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute College Station.
Zhou, F., S. Hu, and T. Scullion. 2013. Balanced RAP/RAS mix design and performance evaluation system for project-specific service conditions. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Aug 4, 2017
Accepted: Dec 21, 2017
Published online: Apr 24, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 24, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Masoumeh Tavakol, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student and Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kansas State Univ., 2156 Fiedler Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mustaque Hossain, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Munger Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kansas State Univ., 2118 Fiedler Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506. Email: [email protected]
Blair Heptig [email protected]
Field Engineer, Kansas Dept. of Transportation, Bureau of Construction and Materials, 2300 Van Buren, Topeka, KS 66611. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share