Evaluation for Microsurfacing as Pavement Preservation Treatment
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 4
Abstract
Over the years, the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) has changed its emphasis from construction to preservation of public highways. As such, there is great interest in assessing cost efficacy of a pavement preservation strategy. This paper aims to present the functional and structural benefits of microsurfacing applications at highway sections in Indiana. To achieve this goal, comprehensive monitoring and data analysis was performed using the pavement condition rating (PCR), structure number (SN), and surface roughness [international roughness index (IRI)] for in situ performance evaluation. According to the deflection and roughness analysis, an improvement was observed in SN and IRI during the early life of the pavement. Furthermore, no significant difference was obtained over the following 2 years. Application of the microsurfacing resulted in a significant rise in PCR and SN and decline in IRI. A similar result was found at the resurfacing site. Pavement with microsurface sections had stable roughness with only a 2-point increase every year. The two control sections (SR-68 and SR-145) have had 4-point increases on average. The IRI for SR-58 resurfacing was () in 2009 (after construction), which is almost half of the 2008 (before construction) IRI value. The rates of decline of the SN and IRI were no different statistically for untreated control sections, and the rate of decline of the PCR was slightly higher than in the pavement preservation project, including resurfacing and microsurfacing. The cost study indicated that microsurfacing would be deemed cost effective if it could provide more than 1.6 years of service life, and resurfacing would be cost effective if it could provide more than 3 years of service life. Considering cost as well as performance, pavement preservation should be an effective strategy to eliminate or retard damage. If applied properly, microsurfacing is an economical alternative to conventional resurfacing. The case study results demonstrate that microsurfacing is a cost-effectiveness treatment in addressing pavement distresses and in extending pavement life in general.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was made possible by the sponsorship of the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT). The authors would like to thank Mr. Todd Shields and Mr. Scott Trammell for their valuable assistance and technical guidance in the course of performing this study.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). “AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures.” Washington, DC.
Applied Research Associates (ARA). (2004). “Guide for mechanistic–empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.”, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Huang, Y. H. (1993). Pavement analysis and design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Indiana Dept. of Transportation (INDOT). (1997). “Pavement condition data collection manual.” internal report, Indianapolis, IN.
Indiana Dept. of Transportation (INDOT). (2010). “2010 INDOT standard specifications.” 〈http://www.in.gov/dot/div/contracts/standards/book/index.html〉 (Dec. 2011).
Labi, S., Lamptey, G., and Kong, S. (2007). “Effectiveness of microsurfacing treatments.” J. Transp. Eng., 133(5), 298–307.
Lee, J., and Shields, T. (2010). “Treatment guidelines for pavement preservation.”, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Ong, G., Noureldin, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2009). “Methodology to evaluate quality of pavement surface distress data collected by automated techniques.” Transportation Research Record 2093, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Raza, H. (1994). “State of the practice: design, construction, and performance of microsurfacing.”, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington DC.
Sincich, T., Levine, M. D., and Stephan, D. (2002). Practical statistics by example using Excel and Minitab, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Watson, D., and Jared, D. (1999). “Georgia Department of Transportation’s experience with microsurfacing.” Transportation Research Record 1616, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 19, 2011
Accepted: Apr 19, 2012
Published online: Apr 23, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.