Case Studies
Sep 8, 2022

Collaborative Evaluation Method of Multiple Team Membership: Case Study of Engineering Design Company

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38, Issue 6

Abstract

Team members’ project collaborative process evaluation is the key link to improve the management effectiveness of an organization. However, there is a lack of evaluation methods from the perspective of multiple team membership (MTM). Based on the data in the project management system (PMS) of engineering design enterprises, this article studies the project participation evaluation method of team members from the perspective of MTM. Using a clustering algorithm, this article developed and verified the participation evaluation index of single projects and multiple projects, a classification and statistics method, and the centrality evaluation method of team members. The research revealed the distribution law of MTM quantity and the influence of team members’ knowledge and ability on it. We found that this index can evaluate objectively team members’ project participation, which can divided into three levels: high, medium, and low. Collaborative activities that contribute significantly to the project account for 20% of the total. The reasonable range for team members to invest in high participation projects is from 2 to 4. For medium participation projects, the number is from 6 to 8. For low participation projects, the number is from 18 to 25, or even unlimited. This study found four positive and four negative effects of personal characteristics on work efficiency. When individuals have these characteristics, team members can better play to their abilities under the project management mechanism, which provides a reference for enterprises to identify and cultivate team members.

Practical Applications

With the transformation of the cooperation mode of consulting projects to diversification and remoteness, the organization has to adapt to the complexity of the project and environment, constantly adjust project team structure, and improve team efficiency. Individual employees increasingly participate in multiple project teams and play different roles. Multiple team membership (MTM) theory provides an important theoretical basis and practical guidance for an organization’s project management activities. Firstly, because it is difficult to quantify and evaluate the project participation of team members (TMs) in a multiproject environment, this article formulates the measurement indicators and classification description methods for evaluating single and multi-project participation in the MTM context, as well as the MTM quantitative statistics method. By dividing the project participation into high, medium and low levels, the distribution law of team members’ work efficiency is revealed, and the in-depth study of MTM theory is realized based on PMS data, so that survey and design enterprises can grasp the workload of employees in real time. Secondly, this study identified the key personal characteristics that affect the workload and the core of team members, so that organizations can cultivate and select talents according to their personal characteristics.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The present study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Programs 51779124) and grants (2022-KY-04) from the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering.

References

Abad, Z., O. Karras, K. Schneider, K. Barker, and M. Bauer. 2018. “Task interruption in software development projects: What makes some interruptions more disruptive than others?” In Proc., ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Series. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S., M. P. Brito, N. M. Abdul, I. H. El-adaway, and B. S. Onggo. 2022. “Capturing the impact of COVID-19 on construction projects in developing countries: A case study of Iraq.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 05021015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000991.
An, N., M. Qiang, Q. Wen, H. Jiang, and B. Xia. 2019. “Contribution of project managers’ capability to project ending performance under stressful conditions.” Eur. Manage. J. 37 (2): 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.04.001.
Barutha, P. J., H. D. Jeong, D. D. Gransberg, and A. Touran. 2021. “Evaluation of the impact of collaboration and integration on performance of industrial projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000921.
Bertolotti, F., E. Mattarelli, M. Vignoli, and D. M. Macrì. 2015. “Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technology.” Res. Policy 44 (4): 911–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.019.
Chan, K.-Y. A. 2014. “Multiple project team membership and performance: Empirical evidence from engineering project teams.” S. Afr. J. Econ. Manage. Sci. 17 (1): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i1.875.
Cooper, R. B., and R. W. Zmud. 1990. “Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach.” Manage. Sci. 36 (2): 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123.
Crawford, E. R., C. J. Reeves, G. L. Stewart, and S. L. Astrove. 2019. “To link or not to link? Multiple team membership and unit performance.” J. Appl. Psychol. 104 (3): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000381.
CTi Forum. 2020. “Global report shows that the proportion of Chinese enterprises allowing most employees to telecommuting after the epidemic has increased more than five times.” [In Chinese.] Accessed April 21, 2021. http://www.ctiforum.com/news/guonei/576988.html.
Cummings, J. N., and M. R. Haas. 2012. “So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams.” J. Organ. Behav. 33 (3): 316–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.777.
Daniel, S., and K. Stewart. 2016. “Open source project success: Resource access, flow, and integration.” J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 25 (3): 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.02.006.
FIDIC (International Federation of Consulting Engineers). 2020. Coronavirus (COVID-19): FIDIC guidance for global consulting engineering businesses: International federation of consulting engineers. Geneva, Switzerland: FIDIC.
Fricke, S. E., and A. J. Shenbar. 2000. “Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 47 (2): 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.846792.
Garcia, A. J., S. Mollaoglu, K. A. Frank, M. Duva, and D. Zhao. 2021. “Emergence and evolution of network structures in complex interorganizational project teams.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000951.
Gibson, H. 2018. “Multiple team membership, turnover, and on-time delivery: Evidence from construction services.” In Proc., Int. Annual Conf. of the American Society for Engineering Management, 1–10. Huntsville, AL: American Society for Engineering Management.
Han, S. H., K. H. Chin, and M. J. Chae. 2007. “Evaluation of CITIS as a collaborative virtual organization for construction project management.” Autom. Constr. 16 (2): 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.04.002.
Hua, Y. 2009. “Xuni tuandui zai pingguoyuan gongcheng zixun xiangmu zhong de yingyong [Application of virtual team in Ping Guo Yuan engineering consulting project].” [In Chinese.] Master thesis, Dept. of Hydropower Engineering, Tsinghua Univ.
Huang, Y., Q. Shi, F. Pena-Mora, Y. Lu, and C. Shen. 2020. “Exploring the impact of information and communication technology on team social capital and construction project performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000804.
Inegbedion, H., E. Inegbedion, A. Peter, and L. Harry. 2020. “Perception of workload balance and employee job satisfaction in work organisations.” Heliyon 6 (1): e3160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03160.
Jiang, N. 2007. “Gongzuo yali lilun moxing shuping [A review of theoretical models of work stress].” [In Chinese.] Xiandai guanli kexue 2007 (11): 57–59. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:XDGL.0.2007-11-023.
Jiang, Q. 2014. “Jiyu OPM3 de B shejiyuan guifanhua zhiliang guanli tixi yanjiu [Standardized Quality Management System based on OPM3 for B Institute].” [In Chinese.] Master thesis, Dept. of Hydropower Engineering, Tsinghua Univ.
Koolwijk, J. S. J., C. J. van Oel, and J. C. Gaviria Moreno. 2020. “No-blame culture and the effectiveness of project-based design teams in the construction industry: The mediating role of teamwork.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (4): 04020033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000796.
Lei, L. 2019. “Jiyu shehui bijiao lilun de zuzhi gongping wenhua jianshe tanjiu [On the construction of organizational justice culture based on social comparison theory].” [In Chinese.] Qiye keji yu fazhan 2019 (10): 214–216. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZXQK.0.2019-10-098.
Li, C. J., and Y. H. Zhang. 2016. “Xinxingshi xia guoqi renli ziyuan jixiao kaohe gaijin jianyi [Suggestions on improving appraisal system of employees’ performance in state owned enterprises in the new context].” [In Chinese.] Wuhan shangxueyuan xuebao 30 (5): 40–44.
Liu, W.-H., and J. A. Cross. 2016. “A comprehensive model of project team technical performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1150–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.011.
Luo, Y., and H. Ling. 2013. “Exploration and exploitation of information systems usage and individual performance.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 22 (Oct): 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.169.
Margolis, J. 2020. “Multiple team membership: An integrative review.” Small Group Res. 51 (1): 48–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419883702.
Marrone, J. A., P. E. Tesluk, and J. B. Carson. 2007. “A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior.” Acad. Manage. J. 50 (6): 1423–1439. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.28225967.
Maynard, M. T., J. E. Mathieu, T. L. Rapp, and L. L. Gilson. 2012. “Something new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness.” J. Organ. Behav. 33 (3): 342. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/job.1772.
Mortensen, M. 2014. “Constructing the team: The antecedents and effects of membership model divergence.” Organ. Sci. 25 (3): 909–931. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0881.
Nainggolan, R., R. Perangin-angin, E. Simarmata, and A. F. Tarigan. 2019. “Improved the performance of the K-means cluster using the sum of squared error (SSE) optimized by using the elbow method.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1361 (1): 12015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1361/1/012015.
Nassar, K., and O. Hosny. 2013. “Fuzzy clustering validity for contractor performance evaluation: Application to UAE contractors.” Autom. Constr. 31 (May): 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.013.
O’Leary, M. B., M. Mortensen, and A. W. Woolley. 2011. “Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 36 (3): 461–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031807.
Qiang, M. S., Q. Wen, H. C. Jiang, and S. N. Yuan. 2015a. “Factors governing construction project delivery selection: A content analysis.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8): 1780–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.001.
Qiang, M. S., Q. Wen, H. C. Jiang, and S. N. Yuan. 2015b. “Jianshe guanli moshi pipei guanxi jiqi dui xiangmu jixiao de yingxiang [Key relationships in project delivery system and their effect on project performance].” [In Chinese.] Tongji daxue xuebao (ziran kexue ban) 43 (1): 160–166. https://doi.org/10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2015.01.024.
Qiang, M. S., S. N. Yuan, and Q. Wen. 2015c. “Gongcheng xiangmu tuandui nengli de celiang yu pingjia [Team capabilities in engineering projects: Measurement and evaluation].” [In Chinese.] Qinghua daxue xuebao (ziran k xue ban) 55 (6): 624–632.
Savelsbergh, C., J. M. P. Gevers, B. I. J. M. van der Heijden, and R. F. Poell. 2012. “Team role stress.” Group Organ. Manage. 37 (1): 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111431977.
Schultz, C., J. Schreyoegg, and C. von Reitzenstein. 2013. “The moderating role of internal and external resources on the performance effect of multitasking: Evidence from the R& D performance of surgeons.” Res. Policy 42 (8): 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.008.
Varajao, J., C. Dominguez, P. Ribeiro, and A. Paiva. 2014. “Critical success aspects in project management: Similarities and differences between the construction and the software industry/ Gledista bitna za uspjeh u upravljanju projektom: Slicnosti i razlike izmedu gradevinske i softverske industrije.” [In Chinese.] Tehnički vjesnik 21 (3): 583.
Varajão, J., R. Colomo-Palacios, and H. Silva. 2017. “ISO 21500:2012 and PMBoK 5 processes in information systems project management.” Comput. Stand. Interfaces 50 (Feb): 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.09.007.
Wang, Y., V. K. Thangasamy, Z. Hou, R. L. K. Tiong, and L. Zhang. 2020. “Collaborative relationship discovery in BIM project delivery: A social network analysis approach.” Autom. Constr. 114 (Jun): 103147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103147.
Wen, Q. 2019. Gongcheng xiangmu jingli nengli yu zuzhi shineng yinsu pipei yanjiu [Matching Construction Project Manager Competences with Organizational Enablers]. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Tsinghua Univ.
Wen, Q., and M. S. Qiang. 2016. “Coordination and knowledge sharing in construction project-based organization: A longitudinal structural equation model analysis.” Autom. Constr. 72 (Part 3): 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.002.
Wu, Z. 2016. Duo tuandui chengyuan shenfen dui tuandui jixiao de yingxiang yanjiu - jiaoliu pinlü de tiaojie zuoyong [Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of communication frequency]. [In Chinese.] Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology.
Yaghootkar, K., and N. Gil. 2012. “The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (1): 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.005.
Yeomans, S. G., N. M. Bouchlaghem, and A. El-Hamalawi. 2006. “An evaluation of current collaborative prototyping practices within the AEC industry.” Autom. Constr. 15 (2): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.011.
Zahedi, M., V. Tessier, and D. Hawey. 2017. “Understanding collaborative design through activity theory.” Supplement, Des. J. 20 (S1): S4611–S4620. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352958.
Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. 2003. “Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition.” Manage. Sci. 49 (4): 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38Issue 6November 2022

History

Received: Jan 29, 2022
Accepted: Jun 13, 2022
Published online: Sep 8, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 8, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Project Management and Construction Technology, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6334-938X. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Project Management and Construction Technology, State Key laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-1765. Email: [email protected]
Master in Landscape Architecture, Dept. Technology and Quality Management, Beijing Institute of Water, Beijing 100048, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Classification Model Using Personal Biometric Characteristics to Identify Individuals Vulnerable to an Extremely Hot Environment, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5495, 40, 2, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share