Technical Papers
Aug 3, 2022

Large-Scale Automated Sustainability Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Using Machine Learning Algorithms with Multisource Remote Sensing Data

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Considering the magnitude, lifespan, and environmental impacts of physical infrastructures, integration of sustainability with development policies has proved to be indispensable; accordingly, several rating systems were nationally developed to enhance implementing sustainability into physical infrastructures. Lack of automation and strategic outlook of the conventional approach to infrastructures’ sustainability assessment, exacerbated by the lengthy and costly processes involved, highlights the necessity of adopting comprehensive and innovative measures. This paper principally aims at extending the scope of sustainability rating systems such as Envision by proposing a framework for large-scale and automated assessment of infrastructures. Based on the proposed framework, a single model was developed incorporating remote sensing and GIS techniques alongside the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm into the Envision rating system. The proposed model adds a certain degree of automation in assessment process regarding the criterion N.W.1.2 of Envision rating system (i.e., provide wetland and surface water buffers) as a starting point toward entire automation of the Envision system. Given the quantitative scale of the criterion N.W.1.2, our model automatically extracts (1) wetlands, (2) waterbodies, and (3) roadways through Optical Satellite_Sentinel-2A, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Satellite_ALOS-1 imagery, and shapefile from Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The image-based model then examines whether certain applicable specifications of Envision scoring system are met. The level of achievement is determined, and the final score in the criteria N.W.1.2 is calculated afterward. The results indicate that more than half of the existing road segments in the study area failed to obtain the minimum required score, regulated by Envision. This emphasizes the criticality of considering sustainability indicators in future infrastructure planning. In addition, the validated results confirm the feasibility of automation of other indicators of the Envision system that will help authorities see the bigger picture and make more sustainable decisions for future practices and policies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their very great appreciation to Dr. Matthew J. McCarthy from the University of South Florida for providing ground truth data.

References

ASCE. 2021. ASCE’s 2021 infrastructure report card. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Avtar, R., et al. 2020. “Assessing sustainable development prospects through remote sensing: A review.” Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ. 20 (Nov): 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100402.
Bilal, M., L. O. Oyedele, J. Qadir, K. Munir, S. O. Ajayi, O. O. Akinade, H. A. Owolabi, H. A. Alaka, and M. Pasha. 2016. “Big data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 30 (3): 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001.
Boothroyd, R. J., R. D. Williams, T. B. Hoey, P. L. M. Tolentino, and X. Yang. 2021. “National-scale assessment of decadal river migration at critical bridge infrastructure in the Philippines.” Sci. Total Environ. 768 (May): 144460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144460.
Casu, F., M. Manunta, P. S. Agram, and R. E. Crippen. 2017. “Big remotely sensed data: Tools, applications and experiences.” Remote Sens. Environ. 202 (1): 1–2.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.013.
Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., D. Jato-Espino, B. Alsulami, and D. Castro-Fresno. 2016. “Evaluation of existing sustainable infrastructure rating systems for their application in developing countries.” Ecol. Indic. 71 (Dec): 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.033.
Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., D. Jato-Espino, and D. Castro-Fresno. 2017. “Methodology for the development of a new sustainable infrastructure rating system for developing countries (SIRSDEC).” Environ. Sci. Policy 69 (Mar): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.010.
Dronova, I. 2015. “Object-based image analysis in wetland research: A review.” Remote Sens. 7 (5): 6380–6413. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70506380.
El-Gafy, M. A., Y. A. Abdelrazig, and T. S. Abdelhamid. 2011. “Environmental impact assessment for transportation projects: Case study using remote-sensing technology, geographic information systems, and spatial modeling.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (2): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000050.
ESA (European Space Agency). 2020. “STEP—Scientific toolbox exploitation platform v6.0.7.” Accessed January 10, 2020. http://step.esa.int.
FDOT. 2019. Transportation data portal. Tallahassee, FL: Transportation Data & Analytics Office.
Ferrer, A. L. C., A. M. T. Thomé, and A. J. Scavarda. 2018. “Sustainable urban infrastructure: A review.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (Jan): 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.017.
García, A. M., I. Santé, X. Loureiro, and D. Miranda. 2020. “Green infrastructure spatial planning considering ecosystem services assessment and trade-off analysis. Application at landscape scale in Galicia region (NW Spain).” Ecosyst. Serv. 43 (Jun): 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101115.
Groover, M. P. 2021. Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: Materials, processes and systems. Singapore: Wiley.
Haas, C. T., and Y. S. Kim. 2002. “Automation in infrastructure construction.” Constr. Innovation 2 (Sep): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170210814766.
ISI (Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure). 2018. Envision v3. Washington, DC: ISI.
Jalaei, F., F. Jalaei, and S. Mohammadi. 2020. “An integrated BIM-LEED application to automate sustainable design assessment framework at the conceptual stage of building projects.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 53 (Feb): 101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101979.
Kavzoglu, T., and I. Colkesen. 2009. “A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification.” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 11 (5): 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2009.06.002.
Keshtkar, H., W. Voigt, and E. Alizadeh. 2017. “Land-cover classification and analysis of change using machine-learning classifiers and multi-temporal remote sensing imagery.” Arabian J. Geosci. 10 (6): 154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-2899-y.
Koc, C. B., P. Osmond, A. Peters, and M. Irger. 2017. “A methodological framework to assess the thermal performance of green infrastructure through airborne remote sensing.” Procedia Eng. 180 (Jan): 1306–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.293.
Koch, C., K. Georgieva, V. Kasireddy, B. Akinci, and P. Fieguth. 2015. “A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 29 (2): 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008.
Kumar, N., V. Poonia, B. B. Gupta, and M. K. Goyal. 2021. “A novel framework for risk assessment and resilience of critical infrastructure toward climate change.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 165 (Apr): 120532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120532.
Lee, J.-S., M. R. Grune, and G. Grandi. 1999. “Polarimetric SAR speckle filtering and its implication for classification.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37 (5): 2363–2373.
Leinenkugel, P., R. Deck, J. Huth, M. Ottinger, and B. Mack. 2019. “The potential of open geodata for automated large-scale land use and land cover classification.” Remote Sens. 11 (19): 2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192249.
Li, Y., J. Yu, K. Ning, S. Du, G. Han, F. Qu, G. Wang, Y. Fu, and C. Zhan. 2014. “Ecological effects of roads on the plant diversity of coastal wetland in the yellow river delta.” Sci. World J. 2014 (Jan): 952051. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/952051.
McCarthy, M. J., E. J. Merton, and F. E. Muller-Karger. 2015. “Improved coastal wetland mapping using very-high 2-meter spatial resolution imagery.” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 40 (Aug): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.011.
McCarthy, M. J., K. R. Radabaugh, R. P. Moyer, and F. E. Muller-Karger. 2018. “Enabling efficient, large-scale high-spatial resolution wetland mapping using satellites.” Remote Sens. Environ. 208 (Apr): 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.021.
Murray, N. J., D. A. Keith, L. M. Bland, R. Ferrari, M. B. Lyons, R. Lucas, N. Pettorelli, and E. Nicholson. 2018. “The role of satellite remote sensing in structured ecosystem risk assessments.” Sci. Total Environ. 619–620 (Apr): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.034.
NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System. 2020. “Optical satellite_sentinel-2A and SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) Satellite_ALOS-1 [EU Copernicus Programme].” Accessed February 12, 2020. https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov.
Rebelo, A. J., P. Scheunders, K. J. Esler, and P. Meire. 2017. “Detecting, mapping and classifying wetland fragments at a landscape scale.” Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ. 8 (Nov): 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.09.005.
Sherwood, E. T., and H. S. Greening. 2014. “Potential impacts and management implications of climate change on Tampa Bay estuary critical coastal habitats.” Environ. Manage. 53 (2): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0179-5.
Studart, R., and K. Gallagher. 2018. “Guaranteeing sustainable infrastructure.” Int. Econ. 155 (Oct): 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.03.003.
SWFWMD. 2011. Water management district land use land cover GIS dataset southwest Florida. Brooksville, FL: Southwest Florida Water Management District Geospatial Open Data Portal.
Thomé, A. M. T., P. S. Ceryno, A. Scavarda, and A. Remmen. 2016. “Sustainable infrastructure: A review and a research agenda.” J. Environ. Manage. 184 (Dec): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.080.
United Nations, General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: Division for Sustainable Development Goals.
van Dijk, A., R. Mount, P. Gibbons, M. Vardon, and P. Canadell. 2014. “Environmental reporting and accounting in Australia: Progress, prospects and research priorities.” Sci. Total Environ. 473–474 (Mar): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.053.
Wang, M., Y. Wan, Z. Ye, and X. Lai. 2017. “Remote sensing image classification based on the optimal support vector machine and modified binary coded ant colony optimization algorithm.” Inf. Sci. 402 (Sep): 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.03.027.
Whyte, A., K. P. Ferentinos, and G. P. Petropoulos. 2018. “A new synergistic approach for monitoring wetlands using Sentinels-1 and 2 data with object-based machine learning algorithms.” Environ. Modell. Software 104 (Jun): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.023.
Xu, H. 2006. “Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 27 (14): 3025–3033. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600589179.
Yang, Y., S. T. Ng, J. Dao, S. Zhou, F. J. Xu, X. Xu, and Z. Zhou. 2021. “BIM-GIS-DCEs enabled vulnerability assessment of interdependent infrastructures—A case of stormwater drainage-building-road transport Nexus in urban flooding.” Autom. Constr. 125 (May): 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103626.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Aug 11, 2021
Accepted: Apr 18, 2022
Published online: Aug 3, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 3, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amiradel Shamshirgaran [email protected]
Master’s of Construction and Project Management, School of Architecture, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5908-7986. Email: [email protected]
Hamidreza Keshtkar [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources, Univ. of Tehran, Karaj 3158777871, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Mahmood Golabchi [email protected]
Professor, School of Architecture, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Mehrdad Sadeghi [email protected]
Master’s of Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir Univ. of Technology, Tehran 1591634312, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Customisation of green buildings assessment tools based on climatic zoning and experts judgement using K-means clustering and fuzzy AHP, Building and Environment, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109473, 223, (109473), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share