Technical Papers
Jul 23, 2022

Performance Forecasts of US Highway Bridge Networks Using Generalized Poisson–Binomial Distribution

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Performance forecasts of highway bridge networks are informative inputs for stakeholders for cost-effective decision-making of funds allocation and asset management. Developing performance forecast models requires establishing a target performance measure (PM) and developing deterioration models accordingly. In the United States, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and state departments of transportation use FHWA’s national PMs to assess highway bridge performance. Incorporating the national PMs for forecast modeling is the focus of this paper. Existing approaches commonly utilize stochastic processes for deterioration modeling, introducing uncertainty into forecasts and creating challenges for decision makers to capture the complete information. Numerical estimation through Monte Carlo simulations is achievable but inefficient. This paper presents an application of the generalized Poisson–binomial distribution as an efficient statistical tool with closed-form solutions to characterize uncertain network PMs based on stochastic forecasts of individual bridges within a network. The study demonstrated and validated the modeling tool with a case study on highway bridges in the United States using historical data (1993–2019). The results showed that this modeling tool achieved a robust and low prediction error. Further, the study demonstrated the feasibility to infer maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) effects when specific MR&R data were not available.

Practical Applications

This study demonstrated and validated an application of the generalized Poisson–binomial distribution for bridge network performance forecasts in terms of FHWA bridge performance measures. The study presented how to develop probabilistic forecasts of a network or a group of bridges. The primary advantage of this study is the theoretical formulations that characterize the network forecasts’ statistics. For practical applications, selections of bridges in a network can vary among multiple users. The theoretical formulation features near-real-time computations. For applications that are sensitive to computations, e.g., online analysis tools, the presented study can be a well-suited candidate. The study also showed the capability of modeling bridge MR&R effects in network performances through a calibration process. The capability can advocate potential applications for developing bridge asset management systems that consider bridge MR&R plaining. The third potential use of the study is to develop a fast or rough estimation of network forecasts with budget constraints. However, readers should refer to the “Limitation” section before starting their own applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was performed while the author held a National Research Council (NRC) Research Associateship award at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Federal Highway Administration, 6300 Georgetown Pike, McLean, VA 22101, United States. The author would like to acknowledge the NRC research associateship program. However, the opinions and conclusions expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Anderson, J. C., A. Unnikrishnan, and T. Schumacher. 2021. “Heterogeneity-based survival analysis of NBI condition ratings for concrete highway bridge decks in Oregon by condition group.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (4): 04021029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000636.
Babanajad, S., Y. Bai, H. Wenzel, M. Wenzel, H. Parvardeh, A. Rezvani, R. Zobel, F. Moon, and A. Maher. 2018. “Life cycle assessment framework for the US bridge inventory.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (12): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118781396.
Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.
Blades, D., D. Constable, S. Lubkin, E. Matias, W. Beatty, J. Buck, R. Rozycki, A. Christenson, and C. Chang. 2018. FHWA computation procedure for the bridge condition measures. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Cesare, M. A., C. Santamarina, C. Turkstra, and E. H. Vanmarcke. 1992. “Modeling bridge deterioration with Markov chains.” J. Transp. Eng. 118 (6): 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:6(820).
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2019. “Stochastic modeling of bridge deterioration using classification tree and logistic regression.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (1): 04018041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000466.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. National performance management measures; assessing pavement condition for the national highway performance program and bridge condition for the national highway performance program, 5886–5970. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. Bridge preservation guide: Maintaining a resilient infrastructure to preserve mobility. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2021. “InfoBridge.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://infobridge.fhwa.dot.gov/.
Frangopol, D. M., and P. Bocchini. 2012. “Bridge network performance, maintenance and optimisation under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (4): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2011.563089.
Frangopol, D. M., M.-J. Kallen, and J. M. V. Noortwijk. 2004. “Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Review and future directions.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 6 (4): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.180.
Ghonima, O., J. C. Anderson, T. Schumacher, and A. Unnikrishnan. 2020. “Performance of US concrete highway bridge decks characterized by random parameters binary logistic regression.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (1): 04019025. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001031.
Ghosn, M., et al. 2016. “Performance indicators for structural systems and infrastructure networks.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): F4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001542.
Goyal, R., M. J. Whelan, and T. L. Cavalline. 2020. “Multivariable proportional hazards-based probabilistic model for bridge deterioration forecasting.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (2): 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000534.
Hong, Y. 2013. “On computing the distribution function for the Poisson binomial distribution.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 59 (Mar): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.10.006.
Huang, Y.-H. 2010. “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000124.
Jiang, Y., M. Saito, and K. C. Sinha. 1988. “Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2283 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/2283-03.
Jiang, Y., and K. C. Sinha. 1989. “Bridge service life prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1223 (1): 24–30.
Kosgodagan-Dalla Torre, A., T. G. Yeung, O. Morales-Nápoles, B. Castanier, J. Maljaars, and W. Courage. 2017. “A two-dimension dynamic Bayesian network for large-scale degradation modeling with an application to a bridges network.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 32 (8): 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12286.
Li, L., F. Li, Z. Chen, and L. Sun. 2016. “Use of Markov chain model based on actual repair status to predict bridge deterioration in Shanghai, China.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2550 (1): 106–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2550-14.
Liu, H., N. Jean, and L. Ping. 2021. “An application of convolutional neural network for deterioration modeling of highway bridge components in the United States.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. (Sep). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1979597.
Liu, H., and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Bridge condition rating data modeling using deep learning algorithm.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (10): 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1712610.
Liu, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2006. “Probability-based bridge network performance evaluation.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(633).
Madanat, S., R. Mishalani, and W. H. W. Ibrahim. 1995. “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(120).
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Mishalani, R. G., and S. M. Madanat. 2002. “Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (4): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:4(139).
Ng, S. K., and F. Moses. 1998. “Bridge deterioration modeling using semi-Markov theory.” Struct. Saf. Reliab. 1 (Jan): 113–120.
Saeed, T. U., M. Moomen, A. Ahmed, J. Murillo-Hoyos, M. Volovski, and S. Labi. 2017. “Performance evaluation and life prediction of highway concrete bridge superstructure across design types.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001051.
Slater, R. E. 1996. “The National Highway System: A commitment to America’s future.” Public Roads 59 (4): 2–6.
Straub, D. 2009. “Stochastic modeling of deterioration processes through dynamic Bayesian networks.” J. Eng. Mech. 135 (10): 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000024.
Tsuda, Y., K. Kaito, K. Aoki, and K. Kobayashi. 2006. “Estimating Markovian transition probabilities for bridge deterioration forecasting.” Struct. Eng./Earthquake Eng. 23 (2): 241s–256s. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceseee.23.241s.
Uspensky, J. V. 1937. Introduction to mathematical probability. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov chain–based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.
Yahaya, M., N. Azis, A. Mohd Selva, M. Ab Kadir, J. Jasni, M. Hairi, Y. Yang Ghazali, and M. Talib. 2018. “Effect of pre-determined maintenance repair rates on the health index state distribution and performance condition curve based on the Markov prediction model for sustainable transformers asset management strategies.” Sustainability 10 (10): 3399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103399.
Yang, D. Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2018. “Risk-informed bridge ranking at project and network levels.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (3): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000430.
Zhang, M., Y. Hong, and N. Balakrishnan. 2018. “The generalized Poisson-binomial distribution and the computation of its distribution function.” J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 88 (8): 1515–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1440294.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Dec 21, 2021
Accepted: May 21, 2022
Published online: Jul 23, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 23, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5746-1279. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share