Correcting the Edge Effect for Sensor Spatial Response in Evapotranspiration Estimation through Remote Sensing
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 7
Abstract
Recent advances in remote-sensing technology using multispectral images provide a powerful tool to estimate crop-water evapotranspiration (ET) at the watershed scale with large spatial and temporal precision. However, most current sensors onboard operational satellites that capture radiances from the thermal infrared (TIR) spectral region are still constrained by limited spatial resolution, which creates a potential error called the edge effect. This consists of information intrusion from surrounding areas that crosses the boundary of the region of interest due to coarse pixel resolution. To reduce this error, a buffer zone is defined as a fixed distance from the field boundary, and the information contained in this zone is excluded from the sample. This study evaluates the optimal buffer distance needed to minimize the bias associated with the aggregated edge effect in annual ET estimates when using Landsat-7 enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+) data. Theoretical and statistical analyses indicate that a buffer of 2-TIR pixel equivalent distance ensures that the remaining field area contain radiances free of edge effects with 98.4% confidence. However, the analysis shows that in a circular turfgrass field of 50.9 ha, this process would eliminate half of the area. The analysis using annual ET data shows that applying a buffer distance of 0.75 TIR pixel is sufficient to mitigate the cumulative edge effect while preserving field representative valuable data. Although this analysis was based on Landsat-7 ETM+ images, the results could also be applied to annual ET maps with different thermal infrared pixel sizes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request:
•
Region of interest pixel data (evapotranspiration, coordinates).
•
Region of interest descriptive statistics and histograms for pixel evapotranspiration data.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge funding from the New Mexico Office of State Engineer, Rio Grande Basin Initiative, New Mexico’s Governor Water Innovation Fund II, NMSU-Agricultural Experimental Station, and the USDA-AFRI Water Rio Grande Conservation Project.
References
Allen, R. G., M. Tasumi, and R. Trezza. 2007. “Satellite based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 133 (4): 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:4(380).
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. 1995. “Regionalization of surface flux densities and moisture indicators in composite terrain: A remote sensing approach under clear skies in Mediterranean climates.” Ph.D. dissertation, Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Landbouwuniversiteit te Wageningen.
Clark, B., R. Soppe, D. Lal, B. Thoreson, W. Bastiaanssen, and G. Davids. 2007. “Variability of crop coefficients in space and time–Examples from California.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Irrigation and Drainage U.S. Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, edited by A. J. Clemmens and S. S. Anderson. Denver: US Committee on Irrigation and Drainage.
Jones, H. G., and X. R. R. Sirault. 2014. “Scaling of thermal images at different spatial resolution: The mixed pixel problem.” Agronomy 4 (3): 380–396. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy4030380.
Kohiyama, M., and F. Yamazaki. 2005. “Image fluctuation model for damage detection using middle-resolution satellite imagery.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 26 (24): 5603–5627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500213896.
Malm, N. R. 2003. “Climate guide: Las Cruces, 1892-2000.” Accessed March 31, 2019. https://aces.nmsu.edu/pubs/research/weather_climate/RR749.pdf.
Markham, B. L. 1985. “The Landsat sensors’ spatial responses.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 23 (Nov): 864–875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1985.289472.
New Mexico Geospatial Data Acquisition Coordination Committee. 2005. “Strauss, NW quarter 31106 RGB.” 2005 digital orthophotography. Accessed February 27, 2008. http://rgis.unm.edu/.
Piñón-Villarreal, A. R., Z. A. Samani, A. S. Bawazir, M. P. Bleiweis, R. Skaggs, and V. V. Tran. 2010. Estimating water use through satellite remote sensing. Las Cruces, NM: Water Resources Research Institute.
Rodríguez-Galiano, V. F., E. Pardo-Igúzquiza, M. Chica-Olmo, and J. P. Rigol Sánchez. 2011. “Increasing the spatial resolution of thermal infrared images using cokriging.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 1st Conf. on Spatial Statistics Procedia Environmental Sciences, 117–122. Enschede, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Ryan, R. E., V. Zanoni, M. Pagnutti, B. Davis, B. Markham, and J. Storey. 2003. “Parameters describing Earth observing remote sensing systems.” Accessed July 20, 2017. http://www.commission1.isprs.org/isprs_ceos_workshop/.
Samani, Z., A. S. Bawazir, M. P. Bleiweiss, R. Skaggs, J. Longworth, V. D. Tran, and A. Piñon. 2009. “Using remote sensing to evaluate the spatial variability of evapotranspiration and crop coefficient in the lower Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico.” Irrig. Sci. 28 (1): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0178-8.
Samani, Z., R. Skaggs, A. Bawazir, M. P. Bleiweiss, V. Tran, and A. Piñón. 2012. “Remote sensing of agricultural water use in New Mexico: From theory to practice.” New Mexico Acad. Sci. New Mexico J. Sci. 47 (1): 1–17.
Tasumi, M., R. G. Allen, R. Trezza, and J. L. Wright. 2007. “Satellite-based energy balance to assess within-population variance of crop coefficient curves.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 131 (1): 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437.
van der Meer, F. D., and S. M. de Jong. 2001. Imaging spectrometry: Basic principles and prospective applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Weisstein, E. W. 2017. “Gaussian function: MathWorld wolfram.” Accessed July 27, 2017. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianFunction.html.
Zhou, G., and N. S.-N. Lam. 2008. “Reducing edge effects in the classification of high resolution imagery.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 74 (4): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.74.4.431.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 8, 2019
Accepted: Jan 30, 2020
Published online: Apr 23, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 23, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.