New Methodology for the Risk Analysis and Economic Impact Assessment of Agricultural Droughts
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 5
Abstract
The paper proposes a new methodology that studies agricultural drought not only in terms of deficit soil water content, its frequency and severity, as in the traditional approach, but also in terms of net benefit. For this purpose the relationship between drought index, crop yield, and crop economic net benefit is modeled and three threshold levels are considered. The first is the critical water content, below which the crop faces water stress (termed as potential agricultural drought). The second is the critical net benefit, below which there is meager (e.g., zero) profit (termed as actual agricultural drought). The third is the critical return period (or frequency) of the actual agricultural drought, below which there is an agricultural aridity (almost steady phenomenon with high impact, high risk) and above which there is an agricultural drought (occasional phenomenon with high impact, low risk). To pinpoint the time of occurrence of the potential and the actual agricultural drought, real-time monitoring is conducted. The rapidity with which these critical conditions are reached is considered as indicative of the crop vulnerability to the corresponding phenomenon. The evolved methodology therefore is based on an objective definition of agricultural drought and is formulated accounting for its peculiar characteristics. The methodology is called the risk analysis and economic impact assessment of agricultural drought (ADERA). ADERA is applied to the rainfed sunflower crop in the Papiano (central Italy) experimental plots for which the 26-year time series for yield and the corresponding phenological, climatic, and economic data are available. The drought index-crop yield-crop economic net benefit relationship makes it possible to quantify the frequency (return period) of the actual agricultural drought and to show that for the given costs and crop sale price the actual agricultural drought risk for the crop is low. For the case study, the vulnerability of the unit to the agricultural drought is low, as the critical net benefit typically occurs late in the growing season.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” FAO Irrigation Drainage, Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Bazza, M. (2002). Water resources planning and management for drought mitigation, In regional workshop on capacity building on drought mitigation in the Near East, Rabat, Morocco, FAO/RNE, Cairo.
Bell, K. R., Blanchard, B. J., Schmugge, T. J., and Witczak, M. W. (1980). “Analysis of surface moisture variations within large-fields sites.” Water Resour. Res., 16(4), 796–810.
Berg, M. van den, and Driessen, P. M. (2002). “Water uptake in crop growth models for land use systems analysis. I: A review of approaches and their pedigrees.” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 92, 21–36.
Chung, C. H., and Salas, J. D. (2000). “Drought occurrence probabilities and risks of dependent hydrologic processes.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(3), 259–268.
Da Cunha, L. V., Vlachos, E., and Yevjevich, V. (1983). “Drought, environment, and society.” Coping with droughts, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo., 3–10.
Doorenbos, J., and Kassam, A. H. (1979). “Yield response to water.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 33, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Dracup, J. A., and Kendall, D. R. (1988). “Frequency analysis of potential hydrologic drought occurrences on the Rone, Po, and Danube rivers.” Proc., Selected Papers from Workshop on Natural Disasters in European Mediterranean Countries, Italian National Research Council, Perugia, Italy, 351–370.
Dracup, J. A., Lee, K. L., and Paulson, E. J. (1980). “On the definition of droughts.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 297–302.
Easterling, W. E. (1988). “Coping with drought hazard: Recent progress and research priorities.” Proc., Selected Papers from Workshop on Natural Disasters in European Mediterranean Countries, Italian National Research Council, Perugia, Italy, 231–270.
Heddinghaus, T. R., and Sabol, P. (1991). “A review of the Palmer drought severity index and where do we go from here?” Proc., 7th Conf. on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 242–246.
Hisdal, H., and Tallaksen, L. M. (2000). “Drought event definition.” Technical Rep. No. 6, ARIDE, Oslo, Norway.
Mannocchi, F., and Mecarelli, P. (1994). “Optimization analysis of deficit irrigation systems.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 120(3), 484–503.
Mannocchi, F., and Mecarelli, P. (1995). “A soil water-crop model for large and small scale applications.” Crops-water simulations models in practice, L. S. Pereira, B. J. Van den Broek, P. Jabat, and R. G. Allen, eds., Wageningen, The Netherlands, 105–120.
Monotti, M., et al. (2004). “Girasole: Conferme e novità della sperimentazione varietale 2003.” L’Informatore Agrario, 10, 47–55 (in Italian).
Palmer, W. C. (1968). “Keeping track of crop moisture conditions, nationwide: The new crop moisture index.” Weatherwise, 21, 156–161.
Panu, U. S., and Sharma, T. C. (2002). “Challenge in drought research: Some perspectives and future directions.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 47(S), S19–S30.
Pereira, L. S. (1990). “The role of irrigation in mitigating the effects of drought.” Proc., 14th ICID Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, ICID, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, India.
Richard, R. H., Jr. (2002). “A review of the twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83(8), 1149–1165.
Ridolfi, L., D’Odorico, P., Porporato, A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2000). “Duration and frequency of water stress in vegetation: An analytical model.” Water Resour. Res., 36(8), 2297–2307.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2000). “Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics.” Water Resour. Res., 36(1), 3–9.
Rossi, G. (2000). “Drought mitigation measures: A comprehensive framework.” Drought and drought mitigation in Europe, J. V. Vogt and F. Somma, eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 233–246.
Rossi, G., Cancelliere, A., and Giuliano, G. (2005). “Case study: Multicriteria assessment of drought mitigation measures.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131(6), 449–457.
Santos, M. A., Correia, F. N., and Rodriguez, R. R. (1988). “Risk assessment of regional droughts.” Proc., Selected Papers from Workshop on Natural Disasters in European Mediterranean Countries, Italian National Research Council, Perugia, Italy, 333–350.
SIMLAB simulation environment for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; version 2.2. (2004). Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Belgium.
Smart, G. M. (1983). “Drought analysis and soil moisture prediction.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 109(2), 251–261.
Tavares, L. V. (1983). “Statistical concepts for droughts.” Coping with droughts, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo., 14–22.
Wilhite, D., and Glantz, M. R. (1985). “Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of definitions.” Water Int., 10, 111–120.
Yevjevich, V. (1967). “An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts.” Hydtrology Paper No. 23, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Yevjevich, V. (1983). “Methods for determining statistical properties of drought.” Coping with droughts, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo., 22–43.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 135 • Issue 5 • October 2009
Pages: 643 - 653
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 21, 2008
Accepted: Feb 1, 2009
Published online: Sep 15, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.