Operative Approach to Agricultural Drought Risk Management
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 5
Abstract
In a companion paper, the agricultural drought economic risk assessment (ADERA) model was described. ADERA studies agricultural drought not only in terms of deficit soil water content and its frequency and severity (as in the traditional approach) but also in terms of net benefit reduction and vulnerability. The relationship between drought index, crop yield, and crop economic net benefit is modeled and three threshold levels are considered: the critical water content; the critical impact in terms of net benefit; and its critical return period (i.e., frequency) above which the soil-climate unit is considered unsuitable for the cultivation of a specific crop. These critical levels are used in long-term action planning as the triggers for different risk classes. The rapidity with which the critical impact is reached is considered indicative of the crop vulnerability, and real-time monitoring of the impact evolution (short-term actions) is also implemented. Initially ADERA was applied at only one point (soil-crop-climate unit), but because agricultural drought is by definition a wide area phenomenon, the model must be validated in other units and then used to evaluate the drought area extension (risk map). In this paper, generalization, demonstration, and guidance on the application of ADERA are given with reference to rainfed sunflower and sorghum crops in six soil-climate units in central Italy for which time series for yield (obtained in experimental plots where the water scarcity was the principal factor limiting the final yield) since 1978 is available. The application of ADERA made it possible to quantify the vulnerability class and the corresponding risk class for the single unit (long-term action planning). The analysis results confirm that typically for the selected crops the critical impact has a low risk and a low vulnerability. In fact sunflower and sorghum are rainfed crops widely cultivated in the area under investigation. Moreover, the results show that each risk class is present only within a specific cost range, in particular the upper and lower limits, and the size of each cost range varies according to the different units; the occurrence of a specific risk class and vulnerability level is highly correlated with the selected triggers, in particular with the critical net benefit (for an increment of which above the corresponding cost range, a given soil-climate unit can become unsuitable for the cultivation of a specific crop); the critical water content is a normal occurrence event for all the units analyzed, with the crop water stress onset date always around 40% of the growing period being a typical characteristic of the specific area, of the two crops and of the selected drought index. The practical usefulness of the impact monitoring procedure was stressed by comparing its progressive evolution in the cases of both a rainfed crop and of a rescue irrigation carried out at a selected and opportune date. In the latter case the impact was reduced below the critical level.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Bazza, M. (2002). Water resources planning and management for drought mitigation, in regional workshop on capacity building on drought mitigation in the Near East, Rabat, Morocco, FAO, Cairo.
Bell, K. R., Blanchard, B. J., Schmugge, T. J., and Witczak, M. W. (1980). “Analysis of surface moisture variations within large-fields sites.” Water Resour. Res., 16(4), 796–810.
Cancelliere, A., Ancarani, A., and Rossi, G. (1998). “Susceptibility of water supply reservoirs to drought conditions.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 3(2), 140–148.
Doorenbos, J., and Kassam, A. H. (1979). “Yield response to water.” FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 33, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Dracup, J. A., and Kendall, D. R. (1988). “Frequency analysis of potential hydrologic drought occurrences on the Rone, Po, and Danuber Rivers.” Proc., Selected Papers from Workshop on Natural Disasters in European Mediterranean Countries, Italian National Research, Perugia, Italy, 351–370.
Dracup, J. A., Lee, K. L., and Paulson, E. J. (1980). “On the definition of droughts.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 297–302.
Easterling, W. E. (1988). “Coping with drought hazard: Recent progress and research priorities.” Proc., Selected Papers from Workshop on Natural Disasters in European Mediterranean Countries, Italian National Research, Perugia, Italy, 231–270.
Karl, T. R. (1983). “Some spatial characteristics of drought duration in the United States.” J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1356–1366.
Mannocchi, F., and Mecarelli, P. (1987). “A mathematical model to define regional agricultural droughts.” Proc., 18th Pittsburgh Conf. on Modelling and Simulation, Instrument Society of America ISA, N.C., 1803–1807.
Mannocchi, F., and Mecarelli, P. (1988). “Crop yield in agricultural drought conditions.” Proc., 19th Pittsburgh Conf. on Modelling and Simulation, Instrument Society of America ISA, N.C., 1503–1509.
Mannocchi, F., and Mecarelli, P. (1995). “A soil water-crop model for large and small scale applications.” Crops-water simulations models in practice, L. S. Pereira, B. J. Van den Broek, P. Jabat, and R. G. Allen, eds., Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands, 105–120.
Mannocchi, F., Todisco, F., and Vergni, L. (2004). “Agricultural drought: Indices, definition, and analysis.” The Basis of civilization—Water science, J. C. Rodda and L. Ubertini, eds., IAHS, The Netherlands.
Mannocchi, F., Todisco, F., Vergni, L. (2009). “A new methodology for the risk analysis and economic impact assessment of agricultural droughts.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135(5), 643–653.
Monotti, M., et al. (2004). “Girasole: Conferme e novità della sperimentazione varietale 2003.” L’Informatore Agrario, 10, 47–55 (in Italian).
Palfai, I. (1990). “Description and forecasting of draughts in Hungary.” Proc., 14th ICID Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, ICID, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, India, 151–158.
Palmer, W. C. (1965). “Meteorological drought.” Research Paper. No. 45, Weather Bureau, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
Panu, U. S., and Sharma, T. C. (2002). “Challenge in drought research: Some perspectives and future directions.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 47(S), S19–S30.
Petrasovitz, I. (1990). “General review on drought strategies.” Proc., 14th ICID Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, ICID, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, India, 1–27.
Ramachandra-Rao, A., and Padmanabhan, G. (1984). “Analysis of modelling of Palmer’s drought index series.” J. Hydrol., 68, 211–229.
Rossi, G. (2000). “Drought mitigation measures: A comprehensive framework.” Drought and drought mitigation in Europe, J. V. Vogt and F. Somma, eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 233–246.
Rossi, G., Benedinti, M., Tsakiris, G., and Giakoumakis, S. (1992). “On regional drought estimation and analysis.” Water Resour. Manage., 6, 249–277.
Santos, M. A., Correia, F. N., and Rodriguez, R. R. (1988). “Risk assessment of regional droughts.” Proc., Selected Papers from Workshop on Natural Disasters in European Mediterranean Countries, Italian National Research Council, Perugia, Italy, 333–350.
Smart, G. M. (1983). “Drought analysis and soil moisture prediction.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 109(2), 251–261.
Tavares, L. V. (1983). “Statistical concepts for droughts.” Coping with droughts, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo., 14–22.
Yevjevich, V. (1967). “An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts.” Hydrology Rep. No. 23, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Yevjevich, V. (1983). “Methods for determining statistical properties of drought.” Coping with droughts, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo., 22–43.
Yevjevich, V., Hall, W. A., and Salas, J. D. (1978). Conf. on drought research needs, Water Resources, Littleton, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 4, 2008
Accepted: Apr 25, 2009
Published online: Apr 29, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.