Technical Papers
May 11, 2022

EPA LEAF Testing of Chlorobenzene-Impacted Sands and Soil–Cement Mix Designs

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper reports on laboratory-based treatability and field quality assurance (QA) testing completed on interbedded sands and silts at an industrial site heavily impacted by a chlorobenzene (CB)-rich nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) to depths of approximately 30 ft (9.1 m) below the ground surface (bgs). Total CB concentrations were measured up to 4,200 and 11,000 mg/kg in untreated sandy and silty soil samples, respectively. EPA 1316M testing indicated that the effective solubility of CB was on the order of 90–210 mg/L in two of the most impacted sand samples, the highest of which (from hotspot location 4370) was selected as the principal threat waste condition. A full depth [25 ft (7.6 m)] soil core from this location was homogenized to form a soil surrogate containing approximately 1,500 mg/kg CB. Three stabilization/solidification (S/S) mix designs using Type I/II portland cement (PC) doses ranging from 5 to 10 wt% were then prepared using the soil surrogate. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and hydraulic conductivity (K) values after 28 days of curing were, respectively, on the order of 190–265 lb/in.2 (1.31–1.83 MPa) and 1.0 × 10−9 cm/s, easily meeting the performance criteria. All mix designs showed essentially the same EPA 1315M leaching response, with percent leaching reductions (%LRs) greater than 99% for CB and benzene (B) compared with the untreated sand. This was well above the minimum of 90% LR established for successful mix designs. During remedial construction, bucket and auger S/S-mixing techniques using 7.5 wt% PC were used to treat approximately 9,335 CY of impacted soils to depths up to 30 ft (9.1 m) bgs (12 bucket-mixed cells and 527 auger columns) in approximately 6 months. The UCS and K criteria were both satisfied. The relative vertical positioning of the EPA 1315M cumulative mass release curves for CB from the field QA samples appeared to be more strongly influenced by the total CB content than by K, because all S/S-treated samples were characterized by K < 1 × 10−6 cm/s (i.e., were diffusion-controlled). EPA 1315M testing of the field-mixed sample from hotspot location 4370 again indicated %LRs greater than 99% for both CB and B. Samples from a second location in the western portion of the ISS treatment area demonstrated similar results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Several Jacobs staff contributed to the overall project work effort associated with the site-related activities (A. Nea, D. Boehnker, P. Weber, M. Germon, R. Rose, P. Kish, to name a few). The EPA 1315M testing was performed at the Eurofins/TestAmerica-Applied Sciences Laboratory (TA-ASL) in Corvallis, Oregon, with chemical analyses performed at the Eurofins/TestAmerica-Pensacola laboratory. Baseline geotechnical testing was conducted at Kemron Environmental Services in Atlanta, whereas K testing was completed by Geotesting Express (Atlanta). All CQA testing was completed by Triad Engineering (Scott Depot, West Virginia). Any opinions, findings, and conclusion expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jacobs or the confidential industrial client.
This work was supported by a confidential industrial client and internal resources provided by Jacobs.

Supplemental Materials

Table S1 is available online in the ASCE Library (www.ascelibrary.org).

References

ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM D2216-10. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM D2974-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM D5084-16a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for compressive strength of molded soil–cement cylinders. ASTM D1633-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017c. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of density (unit weight) of soil specimens. ASTM D7263-18e2. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bates, E., and C. Hills. 2015. Stabilization and solidification of contaminated soil and waste: A manual of practice. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: HyggeMedia.
Berggren, D. R. V. 2015. “The development and testing of a PDMS liner insert for EPA 1315M.” In Proc., 3rd Annual RE3 Conf. Waynesville, NC: Enviroblend.
Eaton, A. D., L. S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg, and M. A. H. Franson. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
EPA. 1986. Handbook for stabilization/solidification of hazardous wastes, office of research and development. EPA 540/2-86/001. Cincinnati: EPA.
EPA. 1993. Technical resource document: Solidification/stabilization and its application to waste materials. EPA 530/R-93/012. Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati: EPA.
EPA. 1994. SW-846 test method 1312: Synthetic precipitation leaching procedure. Cincinnati: EPA.
EPA. 2000. Solidification/stabilization use at superfund sites. EPA 542-R-00-010. Cincinnati: EPA.
EPA. 2004. SW-846 test method 9045D: Soil and solid waste pH. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 9045D. Washington, DC: EPA.
EPA. 2009. Technology performance review: Selecting and using solidification/stabilization treatment for site remediation. EPA 600/R-09/148. Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati: EPA.
EPA. 2013. Superfund remedy report. 14th edn. EPA 542-R-13-016. Washington, DC: EPA.
EPA. 2017a. SW-846 test method 1315: Mass transfer rates of constituents in monolithic or compacted granular materials using a semi-dynamic tank leaching procedure. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 1315. Washington, DC: EPA.
EPA. 2017b. SW-846 test method 1316: Liquid-solid partitioning as a function of liquid-to-solid ratio in solid materials using a parallel batch procedure. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 1316. Washington, DC: EPA.
EPA. 2018. SW-846 test method 8260C: Volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846 Method 8260D. Washington, DC: EPA.
EPA. 2019. Leaching environmental assessment framework (LEAF) how-to guide, rev. 1, U.S. Cincinnati: EPA.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2009. Leaching assessment methods for the evaluation of the effectiveness of in situ stabilization of sediment material at manufactured gas plan sites, EPRI and exelon corporation, first energy corporation and southern company. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.
Finney, D. S., T. Himmer, J. J. Morris, and S. Coladonato. 2014. “Demonstrating leaching reductions of NAPL-impacted soils treated with stabilization/solidification using modified EPA method 1315.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014002.
Gentry, J. L., M. R. Niemet, D. G. Grubb, M. Bruno, D. R. V. Berggren, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2014. “Gowanus canal superfund site II: Stabilization/solidification (S/S) of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014004.
Grubb, D. G., and B. Briggs. 2014. “Stabilization/solidification (S/S) value engineering study—Pesticide impacted superfund site.” In Proc., 2nd Annual RE3 Conf. Waynesville, NC: Enviroblend.
Grubb, D. G., T. M. Himmer, J. L. Gentry, A. J. Salter-Blanc, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2020. “Gowanus canal superfund site. III: Leaching of in situ stabilization/solidification mix designs.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 24 (4): 04020045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000532.
ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2011. Development of performance specifications for solidification/stabilization. Rep. S/S-1. Washington, DC: ITRC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 26Issue 3July 2022

History

Received: Nov 15, 2021
Accepted: Feb 4, 2022
Published online: May 11, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ramzi E. Khuri
Senior Geo-Environmental Engineer, Jacobs Engineering, 1100 Wayne Ave., Suite 1150, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Dusty R. V. Berggren
Technologist, Jacobs Engineering, 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 300, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Dennis G. Grubb, M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Principal Technologist, Jacobs Engineering, 2301 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19103 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. V: Evaluation of ISS Cylinder Sample Crusts Formed During EPA 1315M Testing, Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1208, 27, 3, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share