Technical Papers
May 11, 2022

Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. IV: Delineation of Potentially Migrating NAPL Layers for ISS Treatment

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

Prior publications in this series presented information on the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) impacts, pore fluid saturation (PFS) relationships, stabilization/solidification (S/S) treatability work, and an in-canal in situ S/S (or ISS) pilot test at the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site in Brooklyn, New York, which was impacted by three historic manufactured gas plants (MGPs). This paper reports on the decision-making strategy applied for selecting the planned areas to implement ISS to a depth of 5 ft (1.5 m) into the native sediments after dredging of the overlying soft sediments in remedial target areas (RTA-1 and -2). ISS target areas were developed primarily from in-canal Tar-specific Green Optical Screening Tool (TarGOST) analysis of sediments at a 2-in. (5 cm) layer resolution and the development of an empirical correlation relating the TarGOST percent reference emitter (%RE) response to the NAPL PFS in the cores, and the measured NAPL PFS threshold above which NAPL was considered potentially mobile. A volume accommodation model (VAM) evaluated the ability of various individual NAPL PFS exceedances and their associated layer thicknesses in the sediment to trigger a PFS exceedance above the threshold value of the entire overlying horizon, resulting in NAPL breakthrough from as deep as 10 ft (3 m) into the native sediment. The output from the VAM was integrated with ArcGIS spatial mapping and visualization tools to generate Thiessen polygons that indicated the areas having overall NAPL exceedances. In this way, and coupled with engineering judgment, mobile NAPL areas were effectively targeted for ISS, totaling 82,798 and 227,297 ft2 (7,692 and 21,117 m2) in RTA-1 and -2, respectively, or 15,227 and 49,843 cu yd (11,642 and 38,128 m3) based on the aforementioned ISS mass thickness.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The information reported here is part of a decade-long and evolving project that has had many players. The data and analyses on which this paper is based were completed under USEPA contract numbers 68-S7-04-01 and EP-S5-06-01 through February 2021. The task deliverables were finalized under USACE contract number W912DQ-18-D-3009 that EPA then utilized to select areas for ISS in RTA2. The preparation of this paper by Jacobs’ technical team was supported using internal funds from Jacobs. The authors have done their best to capture the chronology and contributions of the parties (EPA, PRP Group, and respective consultants) since official project reporting (and thus citation dates) often lags. For example, the %RE correlation between the TarGOST data and Dean–Stark PFS originally shown in Niemet and Gentry (2105) was codeveloped with Dakota Technologies (who conducted all TarGOST borings) and later expanded by Geosyntec on behalf of the PRP Group in a series of project submissions. Given the fast-track iterative review process and frequent meetings, innovations on this project were highly collaborative. Accordingly, beyond the current authors, the following individuals participating in the TarGOST and NAPL and ISS delineation activities are acknowledged: (1) Jacobs—A. Salter-Blanc; (2) Dakota—R. St. Germain; and (3) Geosyntec—G. Wealthall, D. Himmelheber, J. Rayner, D. Thorson and D. Tomlinson (posthumously). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jacobs, USEPA, and/or USACE.

References

API (American Petroleum Institute). 1998. Recommended practices for core analysis. Recommended practice 40. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: API.
Center for Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering. 2000. UTCHEM-9.0: A three-dimensional chemical flood simulator. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
CH2M. 2015. In situ solidification/stabilization pilot test construction completion report. Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, Brooklyn, NY. Parsippany, NJ: CH2M.
Chatzis, I., and N. R. Morrow. 1984. “Correlation of capillary number relationships for sandstone.” Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 24 (5): 555–562. https://doi.org/10.2118/10114-PA.
Dakota Technologies. n.d. Accessed April 1, 2022. http://www.dakotatechnologies.com.
Gentry, J. L., M. R. Niemet, D. G. Grubb, M. Bruno, D. R. Berggren, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2015. “Gowanus canal superfund site. II: Stabilization/solidification of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014004.
Geosyntec. 2017. PD-8 NAPL investigation report revision 1 and executive summary, Appendix C—Calculation packages (TarGOST and PFS linear regression calculation package and DNAPL mobilization modeling calculation package). Ewing, NJ: Geosyntec.
Geosyntec. 2019. PD-8 NAPL investigations summary data package for RTA2. Memorandum from D. Himmelheber and G. Wealthall to C. Tsiamis. Ewing, NJ: USEPA.
Grubb, D. G., T. M. Himmer, J. L. Gentry, A. J. Salter-Blanc, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2020. “Gowanus canal superfund site. III: Leaching of in situ stabilization/solidification mix designs.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 24 (4): 04020045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000532.
Niemet, M. R., J. L. Gentry, M. Bruno, D. R. Berggren, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2014. “Gowanus canal superfund site. I: NAPL mobility testing of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014003.
Niemet, M. R., and J. L. Gentry. 2015. Benchtop TarGOST analysis on Gowanus core samples. Technical Memorandum to C. Tsiamis. Parsippany, NJ: USEPA, CH2MHILL.
Olean, T. J., J. L. Gentry, A. J. Salter-Blanc, T. M. Himmer, M. Bruno, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2016. “In-canal stabilization/solidification of NAPL-impacted sediments.” Rem. J. 26 (3): 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21467.
Pennell, K. D., G. A. Pope, and L. M. Abriola. 1996. “Influence of viscous and buoyancy forces on the mobilization of residual tetrachloroethylene during surfactant flushing.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (4): 1328–1335. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9505311.
St. Germain, R. 2015. “LIF frozen core analysis (LIFFCA) using UVOST and TarGOST.” Dakota Technologies, Fargo, ND, December. https://www.dakotatechnologies.com/services/lif-frozen-core-analysis.
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2013. Record of decision: Gowanus canal superfund site, Brooklyn, Kings, County. New York: USEPA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 26Issue 3July 2022

History

Received: Jan 10, 2022
Accepted: Feb 24, 2022
Published online: May 11, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Geologist, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 2020 SW 4th Ave., Suite 300, Portland, OR 97201. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-9587.
Dennis G. Grubb, M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Principal Technologist, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 2310 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19103 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Jeff L. Gentry
Fellow, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 2020 SW 4th Ave., Suite 300, Portland, OR 97201.
Christos D. Tsiamis
Senior Project Manager, Chemical Engineer, US Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007.
Juliana Hess
Project Manager, Jacobs Engineering, 500 7th Avenue, New York, NY 10018.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. VII: Rapid Verification of Organoclay–Sand Capping Blends, Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1375, 28, 4, (2024).
  • Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. V: Evaluation of ISS Cylinder Sample Crusts Formed During EPA 1315M Testing, Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1208, 27, 3, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share