TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 31, 2010

Acid-Gas Storage in a Deep Saline Aquifer: Numerical Sensitivity Study to Evaluate Parameter and Model Uncertainty

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 15, Issue 4

Abstract

A modeling study is conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of acid gas evolution in a deep saline aquifer to expected variations of multiple geologic and engineering variables. Relative permeability hysteresis, aquifer heterogeneity variance, formation water salinity, permeability of caprock and leakage wells, injection rate, regional hydraulic gradient, and formation depth are evaluated as uncertain input parameters to a three-dimensional synthetic aquifer model with fully heterogeneous permeability. To understand the effect of conceptual model uncertainty on predicting gas flow and storage, permeability of the heterogeneous model is upscaled to equivalent permeability for three increasingly homogenized stratigraphic models: an eight-unit facies model, a three-unit depositional model, and a one-unit formation model. Two upscaling methods are used: a flow-based numerical method and an analytical averaging method. Over 120 years (20 years of injection and 100 years of monitoring), multiphase compositional simulation is conducted to model gas migration and trapping in the aquifer and its dissolution in the formation brine. Results suggest that among the variables evaluated, gas-relative permeability hysteresis, heterogeneity variance, and injection rate have the most significant impact predicting the total mobile gas in the storage system, whereas caprock permeability is the most important factor influencing the prediction of total gas leakage and thus the storage security. Over the simulation time scale, for the fixed amount of gas injected, regional hydraulic gradient, salinity, and formation depth have lesser impact on gas flow and storage predictions. Further, leakage through abandoned wells can occur when permeability of the wellbore is as low as 1 mdarcy (md), while caprock permeability becomes critical to storage security when it is more than 1×10-4md, in which case significant leakage occurs during the monitoring phase. Compared to the predictions of the heterogeneous model, the greater the number of stratigraphic units in the upscaled models, the better its accuracy in predicting gas storage and plume sweep. However, the accuracy of the stratigraphic models depends on aquifer variance, upscaling method, and type of prediction outcome that is being evaluated.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the technical support and software donation from Schlumberger, Ltd. Funding for this study is provided in part by the American Chemical Society, Petroleum Research Fund (ACS PRF Grant No. UNSPECIFIED48773-DNI 8), and in part by the School of Energy Resources at the University of Wyoming through its Matching Grant Fund Program. The manuscript has benefited from the detailed comments of three anonymous reviewers.

References

Amaziane, B., Bourgeat, A., and Koebbe, J. (1991). “Numerical simulation and homogenization of two-phase tow in heterogeneous porous media.” Transp. Porous Media, 6(5–6), 519–547.
Ataie-Ashtiani, B., Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Celia, M. A. (2002). “Effects of heterogeneities on capillary pressure-saturation-relative permeability relationships.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 56(3–4), 175–192.
Bachu, S. (2003). “Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change.” Environ. Geol., 44(3), 277–289.
Bachu, S., and Gunter, W. D. (2004). “Overview of acid-gas injection operations in western Canada.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vol. 1, Elsevier Science, Atlanta, 443–448.
Bennion, B., and Bachu, S. (2005). “Relative permeability characteristics for supercritical CO2 displacing water in a variety of potential sequestration zones in the western Canada sedimentary basin.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 95547.
Bennion, B., and Bachu, S. (2007). “Permeability and relative permeability measurements at reservoir conditions for CO2-water systems in ultralow-permeability confining caprocks.” SPE paper, 106995.
Birkholzer, J. T., and Zhou, Q. (2009). “Basin-scale hydrologic impacts of CO2 storage regulatory and capacity implications.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 3(6), 745–756.
Braun, C., Helmig, R., and Manthey, S. (2005). “Macro-scale effective constitutive relationships for two-phase flow processes in heterogeneous porous media with emphasis on the relative permeability–saturation relationships.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 76(1–2), 47–85.
Bryant, S., Lakshminarasimhan, S., and Pope, G. A. (2008). “Buoyancy-dominated multiphase flow and its effect on geological sequestration of CO2.” SPE J., 13(4), 447–454, paper SPE-99938-PA.
Carroll, J., Griffin, P., and Alkafeef, S. (2009). “Review and outlook of subsurface acid gas disposal.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 120046-MS.
Chang, Y., Coats, B. K., and Nolen, J. S. (1998). “A compositional model for CO2 floods including CO2 solubility in water.” SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng., 1(2), 155–158.
Class, H., et al. (2009). “A benchmark study on problems related to CO2 storage in geologic formations.” Comput. Geosci., 13(4), 409–434.
Das, D. B., Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Rotter, B. E. (2004). “A numerical study of micro-heterogeneity effects on upscaled properties of two-phase flow in porous media.” Transp. Porous Media, 56(3), 329–350.
Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G. (1997). GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, Oxford University Press, New York.
Durlofsky, L. J. (2005). “Upscaling and gridding of fine scale geological models for flow simulation.” 8th Int. Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Stressa, Italy, 〈http://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/research/suprihw/durlofsky/publications2.htm〉.
Durlofsky, L. J., Jones, R., and Miliken, W. J. (1997). “A nonuniform coarsening approach for the scale-up of displacement processes in heterogeneous porous media.” Adv. Water Resour., 20(5–6), 335–347.
Ebigbo, A., Class, H., and Helmig, R. (2007). “CO2 leakage through an abandoned well: 3 problem-oriented benchmarks.” Comput. Geosci., 11(2), 103–115.
Ertekin, T., Abou-Kassem, J., and King, R. (2001). “Basic applied reservoir simulation.” Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Flett, M., Gurton, R., and Taggart, I. (2004). “The function of gas–water relative permeability hysteresis in the sequestration of carbon dioxide in saline formations.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 88485-MS.
Gasda, S. E., Bachu, S., and Celia, M. A. (2004). “The potential for CO2 leakage from storage sites in geological media: Analysis of well distribution in mature sedimentary basins.” Environ. Geol., 46(6–7), 707–720.
Gasda, S. E., and Celia, M. A. (2005). “Upscaling relative permeabilities in a structured porous medium.” Adv. Water Resour., 28(5), 493–506.
Gelhar, L. (1993). Stochastic subsurface hydrology, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Holtz, M. H. (2002). “Residual gas saturation to aquifer influx: A calculation method for 3-d computer reservoir model construction.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 75502.
Hunter, J., and Bryan, L. (1987). “LaBarge project: Availability of CO2 for tertiary projects.” J. Pet. Technol., 39(11), 1407–1410, paper 15160-PA.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2005). “Underground geological storage.” Chapter 5, Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, 〈http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs_chapter5.pdf〉.
Juanes, R., Spiteri, E. J., Orr, F. M. J., and Blunt, M. J. (2006). “Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage.” Water Resour. Res., 42, W12418.
Killough, J. E. (1976). “Reservoir simulation with history-dependent saturation functions.” SPE J., 16(1), 37–48.
Kumar, A., et al. (2005). “Reservoir simulation of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers.” SPE J., 10(3), 336–348.
Land, C. S. (1968). “Calculation of imbibiton relative permeability for two and three-phase flow from rock properties.” SPE J., 8(2), 149–156.
Li, K., Chow, K., and Horne, R. N. (2006). “Influence of initial water saturation on recovery by spontaneous imbibition gas/water/rock systems and the calculation of relative permeability.” SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng., 9(4), 295–301.
Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., and Du, C. (2011). “Geological modeling and fluid-flow simulation of acid gas disposal in western Wyoming.” AAPG Bull., in press.
Michael, K., and Buschkuehle, B. (2006). “Acid-gas injection at West Stoddart, British Columbia: An analogue.” J. Geochem. Explor., 89(1–3), 280–283.
Milliken, W., Levy, M., Strebelle, S., and Zhang, Y. (2007). “The effect of geologic parameters and uncertainties on subsurface flow: Deepwater depositional systems.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 114099.
Mo, S., and Akervoll, I. (2005). “Modeling long-term CO2 storage in aquifer with a black-oil reservoir simulator.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 93951-MS.
Nghiem, L., et al. (2009a). “Optimization of residual gas and solubility trapping for CO2 storage in saline aquifers.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 93951-MS.
Nghiem, L., Shrivastava, V., Tran, D., Kohse, B., Hassam, M., and Yang, C. (2009b). “Simulation of CO2 storage in saline aquifers.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 125848-MS.
Oloruntobi, O. S., and LaForce, T. (2009). “Effect of aquifer heterogeneity on CO2 sequestration.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 121776-MS.
Ozah, R. C., Lakshminarasimhan, S., Pope, G. A., Sepehrnoori, K., and Bryant, S. L. (2009). “Numerical simulation of the storage of pure CO2 and CO2-H2S gas mixtures in deep saline aquifers.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 97255-MS.
Paleologos, E. K., Neuman, S. P., and Tartakovsky, D. (1996). “Effective hydraulic conductivity of bounded, strongly heterogeneous porous media.” Water Resour. Res., 32(5), 1333–1341.
Pickup, G., Stephen, K., Ma, J., Zhang, P., and Clark, J. (2005). “Multi-stage upscaling: Selection of suitable methods.” Transp. Porous Media, 58(1–2), 191–216.
Renard, P., and de Marsily, G. (1997). “Calculating equivalent permeability: A review.” Adv. Water Resour., 20(5–6), 253–278.
Rubin, Y., and Dagan, G. (1988). “Stochastic analysis of boundary effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 1 constant head boundary.” Water Resour. Res., 24(10), 1689–1697.
Saadatpoor, E., Bryant, S. L., and Sepehrnoori, K. (2007). “Effect of heterogeneous capillary pressure on buoyancy-driven CO2 migration.” 6th Annual Conf. on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, 〈http://www.cpge.utexas.edu/gcs/pubs/buoyancy_driven_flow_paper.pdf〉.
Sáez, A. E., Otero, C. J., and Rusinek, I. (1989). “The effective homogeneous behavior of heterogeneous porous media.” Transp. Porous Media, 4(3), 213–238.
Sanchez-Vila, X., Guadagnini, A., and Carrera, J. (2006). “Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow.” Rev. Geophys., 44, RG3006.
Sarris, T. S., and Paleologos, E. K. (2004). “Numerical investigation of the anisotropic hydraulic conductivity behavior in heterogeneous porous media.” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 18(3), 188–197.
Schlumberger (2009). “The GASWAT option.” ECLIPSE technical description.
Sifuentes, W., Blunt, M. J., and Giddins, M. A. (2010). “Modeling CO2 storage in aquifers: Assessing the key contributors to uncertainty.” JPT, J. Pet. Technol., 62(7), 71–72.
Smith, S., Sorensen, J., Steadman, E., and Harju, J. (2009). “Acid gas injection and monitoring at the Zama Oil Field in Alberta, Canada: A case study in demonstration-scale carbon dioxide sequestration.” Energy Procedia, 1(1), 1981–1988.
Soreide, I., and Whitson, I. S. (1992). “Peng–Robinson predictions for hydrocarbons, CO2, N2, H2S 14 with pure water and NaCl brine.” Fluid Phase Equilib., 77, 217–240.
Spiteri, E. J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M. J., and Orr, F. M. J. (2008). “A new model of trapping and relative permeability hysteresis for all wettability characteristics.” SPE J., 13(3), 277–288.
Taggart, I. (2009). “Extraction of dissolved methane in brines by CO2 injection: Implication for CO2 sequestration.” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), paper 124630.
Wen, X.-H., and Gómez-Hernández, J. (1996). “Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: An overview.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 183(1–2), ix–xxxiii.
Zhang, Y., Gable, C. W., and Person, M. (2006). “Equivalent hydraulic conductivity of an experimental stratigraphy—Implications for basin-scale flow simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 42, W05404.
Zhang, Y., Gable, C. W., and Sheets, B. (2010a). “Equivalent hydraulic conductivity of three-dimensional heterogeneous porous media: An upscaling study base on an experimental stratigraphy.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 388(3–4), 304–320.
Zhang, Y., Liu, B., and Gable, C. (2010b). “Homogenization of hydraulic conductivity for three-dimensional sedimentary deposits at multiple scales.” Transp. Porous Media, 87(3), 717–737.
Zhang, Y., Person, M., Merino, E., and Szpakiewcz, M. (2005). “Evaluation of soluble benzene migration in the Uinta Basin.” Geofluids, 5(2), 106–123.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 15Issue 4October 2011
Pages: 234 - 250

History

Received: Feb 3, 2010
Accepted: Aug 6, 2010
Published online: Aug 31, 2010
Published in print: Oct 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Baozhong Liu
Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.
Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Xu Zhang
Schlumberger Information Solutions, Schlumberger, 5599 San Felipe, Suite 1700, Houston, TX 77056.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share