Innovative Simulation of Unsteady Low-Pressure Flows in Water Mains
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 11
Abstract
This work presents a new numerical-model approach to simulate abnormal operational conditions in water mains, including the transition between free-surface and pressurized flow-regimes and subatmospheric unsteady flows leading to cavitation. The method is based on the two-component pressure approach (TPA), which is modified to incorporate a variable acoustic wave-speed calculation that depends on the pipe elasticity properties and on estimated free-gas content. This modification represents an improvement over the original TPA method for water-main applications in that the celerity, originally treated as a simulation parameter, now varies with space and time as would be anticipated in actual conditions. The proposed method was tested in three different conditions that involved unsteady flows and vaporous cavitation, and its results were compared with the original TPA model, the method of characteristics discrete free-gas cavity model, and experimental data. The comparative analysis indicates that the modified TPA model be an interesting and useful alternative to simulate unsteady flows in water mains in cases in which flow-regime transition is anticipated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to acknowledge the support of CNPq agency—Brazil, which partially funded the graduate studies of the second writer.
References
Brunner, G. W. (2010). HEC-RAS, river analysis system reference manual version 4.1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
Cardle, J. A., and Song, C. S. S. (1988). “Mathematical modeling of unsteady flow in storm sewers.” Int. J. Eng. Fluid Mech., 1(4), 495–518.
Cunge, J. A., Holly, F. M., Jr., and Verwey, A. (1980). Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics, Pitman, London, UK.
Cunge, J. A., and Wegner, M. (1964). “Integration numerique des equations d’ecoulement de Barre de St. Venant par un schema implicite de differences finies. Application au cas d’une galerie tantot en charge tantot a surface libre.” Houille Blanche, 1(1), 33–39 (in French).
Guinot, V. (2001). “Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in pipes using Godunov method.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 50, 1169–1189.
Leon, A. S., Ghidaoui, M. S., Schmidt, A. R., and Garcia, M. H. (2008). “Efficient second-order accurate shock-capturing scheme for modeling one- and two-phase water hammer flows.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(7), 970–983.
Macchione, F., and Morelli, M. A. (2003). “Practical aspects in comparing the shock-capturing schemes for dam break problems.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 129(3), 187–195.
Politano, M., Oodgard, A. J., and Klecan, W. (2007). “Case study: Numerical evaluation of hydraulic transients in a combined sewer overflow tunnel system.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 133(10), 1103–1110.
Rossman, L. A. (2004). Storm water management model user’s manual version 5.0, U.S. EPA, National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL), Cincinnati.
Sanders, B. F., and Bradford, S. F. (2011). “Network implementation of the two-component pressure approach for transient flow in storm sewers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 137(2), 158–172.
Simpson, A. R. (1986). “Large water hammer pressure due to column separation in sloping pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Song, C. S. S., Cardle, J. A., and Leung, K. S. (1983). “Transient mixed-flow models for storm sewers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 109(11), 1487–1504.
Sturm, T. (2010). Open channel hydraulics, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Toro, E. F. (2001). Shock-capturing methods for free-surface shallow flows, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Tullis, J. P. (1989). Hydraulics of pipelines, 1st Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Vasconcelos, J. G., Moraes, J. R. S., and Gebrim, D. V. B. (2009). “Field measurements and numerical modeling of a water pipeline filling event.” Proc., 33rd IAHR Congress, Int. Association of Hydraulic Research, Vancouver, Canada.
Vasconcelos, J. G., and Wright, S. J. (2007). “Comparison between the two-component pressure approach and current transient flow solvers.” J. Hydraul. Res., 45(2), 178–187.
Vasconcelos, J. G., and Wright, S. J. (2008). “Rapid flow startup in filled horizontal pipelines.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(7), 984–992.
Vasconcelos, J. G., and Wright, S. J. (2009). “Investigation of rapid filling of poorly ventilated stormwater storage tunnels.” J. Hydraul. Res., 47(5), 547–558.
Vasconcelos, J. G., Wright, S. J., and Roe, P. L. (2006). “Improved simulation of flow regime transition in sewers: The two-component pressure approach.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 132(6), 553–562.
Wylie, E. B., and Streeter, V. L. (1993). Fluid transient in systems, Prentice Hall, New York.
Zhao, M., and Ghidaoui, M. S. (2004). “Godunov-type solutions for water hammer flows.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(4), 341–348.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 11 • November 2011
Pages: 1490 - 1499
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 5, 2010
Accepted: Apr 12, 2011
Published online: Apr 14, 2011
Published in print: Nov 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.