Technical Papers
May 31, 2020

AR-GARCH with Exogenous Variables as a Postprocessing Model for Improving Streamflow Forecasts

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 8

Abstract

The common strategy for real-time streamflow forecasting involves a precalibrated rainfall-runoff model for streamflow simulation together with a statistical postprocessing model of simulation errors for updating simulated streamflow. Recognizing both autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity inherent in the simulation errors of rainfall-runoff models, the autoregressive-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (AR-GARCH) model is introduced as a statistical postprocessing model of simulation errors in this study, in which the AR model is used to forecast the mean process of simulation errors, and the GARCH model to forecast the variance process of simulation errors. For investigating how well incorporating exogenous variables that contribute to heteroscedasticity improves update accuracy by comparing the GARCH model with and without exogenous variable, in this study, two rainfall-runoff models (one lumped and one distributed) have been chosen to simulate streamflow in three basins. Case studies show that (1) the AR-GARCH model with an exogenous variable showed advantages over AR-GARCH without exogenous variables through both increased forecast accuracy and reduced uncertainty during the validation period, and (2) more than 90% of error heteroscedasticity is due to the internal variable and less than 10% is due to the exogenous variable in this study. Only one exogenous variable was considered in this study, so further research is necessary to identify more exogenous variables which may have a greater contribution to simulate error heteroscedasticity. In conclusion, the developed AR-GARCH model with exogenous variables has the flexibility to deal with the characteristics of error series including autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity. Although the application of this study focused on streamflow forecasting, the developed methodology may be generalized and implemented in other applications to time-series data with complex errors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Except the daily inflow and outflow data of reservoirs which are obtained under nondisclosure agreement, other data, models, or code used in this study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0405901), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41890822 and 51525902), the Research Council of Norway (FRINATEK Project 274310), and the Ministry of Education “Plan 111” Fund of China (B18037), all of which are greatly appreciated. We greatly appreciate the editor and the three reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions for improving the manuscript.

References

Bollerslev, T. 1986. “Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity.” J. Econom. 31 (3): 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
Box, G. E. P., and G. M. Jenkins. 1976. Time series analysis forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Chen, L., Y. Zhang, J. Zhou, V. P. Singh, S. Guo, and J. Zhang. 2015. “Real-time error correction method combined with combination flood forecasting technique for improving the accuracy of flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 521 (Feb): 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.053.
CMDC (China Meteorological Data Service Center). 2012. “China’s surface climatological dataset (version 3.0).” Accessed March 20, 2019. http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_DAY_V3.0.html.
Del Giudice, D., M. Honti, A. Scheidegger, C. Albert, P. Reichert, and J. Rieckermann. 2013. “Improving uncertainty estimation in urban hydrological modeling by statistically describing bias.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (10): 4209–4225. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4209-2013.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (4): 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985.
Enders, W. 2014. “Modeling economic time series: Trends and volatility.” In Applied econometric time series. 4th ed., 141–143. New York: Wiley.
Engeland, K., B. Renard, I. Steinsland, and S. Kolberg. 2010. “Evaluation of statistical models for forecast errors from the HBV model.” J. Hydrol. 384 (1–2): 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.018.
Engle, R. F. 1982. “Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation.” Econometrica 50 (4): 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773.
Evin, G., D. Kavetski, M. Thyer, and G. Kuczera. 2013. “Pitfalls and improvements in the joint inference of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation in hydrological model calibration.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (7): 4518–4524. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20284.
Evin, G., M. Thyer, D. Kavetski, D. McInerney, and G. Kuczera. 2014. “Comparison of joint versus postprocessor approaches for hydrological uncertainty estimation accounting for error autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (3): 2350–2375. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014185.
Fathian, F., A. Fakheri-Fard, R. Modarres, and P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder. 2018. “Regional scale rainfall–runoff modeling using VARX–MGARCH approach.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 32 (4): 999–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1428-6.
Goswami, M., K. M. O’Connor, K. P. Bhattarai, and A. Y. Shamseldin. 2005. “Assessing the performance of eight real-time updating models and procedures for the Brosna River.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 9 (4): 394–411. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-394-2005.
Gragne, A. S., A. Sharma, R. Mehrotra, and K. Alfredsen. 2015. “Improving real-time inflow forecasting into hydropower reservoirs through a complementary modelling framework.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (8): 3695–3714. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3695-2015.
Gupta, H. V., H. Kling, K. K. Yilmaz, and G. F. Martinez. 2009. “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol. 377 (1–2): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
Jensen, M. B., and A. Lunde. 2001. “The NIG-S&ARCH model: A fat-tailed, stochastic, and autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic volatility model.” Econom. J. 4 (2): 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00070.
Jie, M.-X., H. Chen, C.-Y. Xu, Q. Zeng, J. Chen, J.-S. Kim, and F.-Q. Guo. 2018. “Transferability of conceptual hydrological models across temporal resolutions: Approach and application.” Water Resour. Manage. 32 (4): 1367–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1874-4.
Kavetski, D., S. W. Franks, and G. Kuczera. 2003. “Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling.” In Calibration of watershed models, 49–68. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Klemeš, V. 1986. “Operational testing of hydrological simulation models.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 31 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668609491024.
Kuczera, G. 1983. “Improved parameter inference in catchment models: 1. evaluating parameter uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res. 19 (5): 1151–1162. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i005p01151.
Laio, F., and S. Tamea. 2007. “Verification tools for probabilistic forecasts of continuous hydrological variables.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11: 1267–1277. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1267-2007.
Liu, J., X. Chen, J. Zhang, and M. Flury. 2009. “Coupling the Xinanjiang model to a kinematic flow model based on digital drainage networks for flood forecasting.” Hydrol. Process. 23 (9): 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7255.
McInerney, D., M. Thyer, D. Kavetski, B. Bennett, J. Lerat, M. Gibbs, and G. Kuczera. 2018. “A simplified approach to produce probabilistic hydrological model predictions.” Environ. Modell. Software 109 (Nov): 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.001.
McInerney, D., M. Thyer, D. Kavetski, J. Lerat, and G. Kuczera. 2017. “Improving probabilistic prediction of daily streamflow by identifying Pareto optimal approaches for modeling heteroscedastic residual errors.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (3): 2199–2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019168.
Mehdizadeh, S., J. Behmanesh, and K. Khalili. 2017. “A comparison of monthly precipitation point estimates at 6 locations in Iran using integration of soft computing methods and GARCH time series model.” J. Hydrol. 554 (Nov): 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.056.
Modarres, R., and T. B. M. J. Ouarda. 2013. “Modeling rainfall-runoff relationship using multivariate GARCH model.” J. Hydrol. 499 (Aug): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.044.
Modarres, R., and T. B. M. J. Ouarda. 2014. “Modeling the relationship between climate oscillations and drought by a multivariate GARCH model.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (1): 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013810.
Morawietz, M., C.-Y. Xu, L. Gottschalk, and L. M. Tallaksen. 2011. “Systematic evaluation of autoregressive error models as post-processors for a probabilistic streamflow forecast system.” J. Hydrol. 407 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.007.
Niu, J., J. Chen, L. Sun, and B. Sivakumar. 2018. “Time-lag effects of vegetation responses to soil moisture evolution: A case study in the Xijiang basin in South China.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 32 (8): 2423–2432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1492-y.
Oliveira, D. Y., P. L. B. Chaffe, and J. H. M. Sá. 2018. “Extending the applicability of the generalized likelihood function for zero-inflated data series.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (3): 2494–2506. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021560.
Pulukuri, S., V. R. Keesara, and P. Deva. 2018. “Flow forecasting in a watershed using autoregressive updating model.” Water Resour. Manage. 32 (8): 2701–2716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1953-1.
Quesada-Montano, B., I. K. Westerberg, D. Fuentes-Andino, H. G. Hidalgo, and S. Halldin. 2018. “Can climate variability information constrain a hydrological model for an ungauged Costa Rican catchment?” Hydrol. Process. 32 (6): 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11460.
Refsgaard, J. C. 1997. “Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting.” Hydrol. Res. 28 (2): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1997.0005.
Renard, B., D. Kavetski, G. Kuczera, M. Thyer, and S. W. Franks. 2010. “Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (5): W05521. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008328.
RESDC (Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences). 2015. “Provincial administrative boundary of China.” Accessed April 21, 2020. http://www.resdc.cn/data.aspx?DATAID=200.
Santos, L., G. Thirel, and C. Perrin. 2018. “Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the KGE criterion.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (8): 4583–4591. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4583-2018.
Schoups, G., and J. A. Vrugt. 2010. “A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (10): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008933.
Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat. 6 (2): 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
Smith, T., L. Marshall, and A. Sharma. 2015. “Modeling residual hydrologic errors with Bayesian inference.” J. Hydrol. 528 (Sep): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.051.
Smith, T., A. Sharma, L. Marshall, R. Mehrotra, and S. Sisson. 2010. “Development of a formal likelihood function for improved Bayesian inference of ephemeral catchments.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (12): W12551. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009514.
Teweldebrhan, A. T., J. F. Burkhart, and T. V. Schuler. 2018. “Parameter uncertainty analysis for an operational hydrological model using residual-based and limits of acceptability approaches.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (9): 5021–5039. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5021-2018.
Thyer, M., B. Renard, D. Kavetski, G. Kuczera, S. W. Franks, and S. Srikanthan. 2009. “Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis.” Water Resour. Res. 45 (12): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006825.
Todini, E. 2004. “Role and treatment of uncertainty in real-time flood forecasting.” Hydrol. Process. 18 (14): 2743–2746. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5687.
Tsay, R. S. 1987. “Conditional heteroscedastic time series models.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82 (398): 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478471.
Tsay, R. S. 2010. Analysis of financial time series. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
van Andel, S. J., A. Weerts, J. Schaake, and K. Bogner. 2013. “Post-processing hydrological ensemble predictions intercomparison experiment.” Hydrol. Process. 27 (1): 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9595.
Wang, Q. J., D. L. Shrestha, D. E. Robertson, and P. Pokhrel. 2012. “A log-sinh transformation for data normalization and variance stabilization.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (5): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010973.
Wang, W., P. H. A. J. M. Van Gelder, J. K. Vrijling, and J. Ma. 2005. “Testing and modelling autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity of streamflow processes.” Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 12 (1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-12-55-2005.
Xie, H., D. Li, and L. Xiong. 2016. “Exploring the regional variance using ARMA-GARCH models.” Water Resour. Manage. 30 (10): 3507–3518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1367-x.
Xiong, L., and S. Guo. 2004. Distributed watershed hydrological model. [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Water Power Press.
Xiong, L., S. L. Guo, and X. R. Tian. 2004a. “DEM-based distributed hydrological model and its application.” [In Chinese.] Adv. Water Sci. 15 (4): 517–520.
Xiong, L., and K. M. O’Connor. 2002. “Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 47 (4): 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660209492964.
Xiong, L., K. M. O’Connor, and S. Guo. 2004b. “Comparison of three updating schemes using artificial neural network in flow forecasting application of ANN in rainfall-runoff.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 8 (2): 247–255. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-8-247-2004.
Xiong, L., M. Wan, X. Wei, and K. M. O’Connor. 2009. “Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 54 (5): 852–871. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.5.852.
Xiong, L., H. Yang, L. Zeng, and C-Y. Xu. 2018. “Evaluating consistency between the remotely sensed soil moisture and the hydrological model-simulated soil moisture in the Qujiang catchment of China.” Water 10 (3): 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030291.
Xiong, L., and L. Zeng. 2019. “Impacts of introducing remote sensing soil moisture in calibrating a distributed hydrological model for streamflow simulation.” Water 11 (4): 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040666.
Yang, H., L. Xiong, Q. Ma, J. Xia, J. Chen, and C.-Y. Xu. 2019. “Utilizing satellite surface soil moisture data in calibrating a distributed hydrological model applied in humid regions through a multi-objective Bayesian hierarchical framework.” Remote Sens. 11 (11): 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111335.
Zhang, H., B. Wang, D. L. Liu, M. Zhang, P. Feng, L. Cheng, and D. Eamus. 2019. “Impacts of future climate change on water resource availability of eastern Australia: A case study of the Manning River basin.” J. Hydrol. 573 (Jun): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.067.
Zhang, X., P. Liu, L. Cheng, Z. Liu, and Y. Zhao. 2018. “A back-fitting algorithm to improve real-time flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 562 (2018): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.051.
Zhao, R. J. 1992. “The Xinanjiang model applied in China.” J. Hydrol. 135 (1–4): 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90096-E.
Zhao, R. J., and X. R. Liu. 1995. “The Xinanjiang model.” In Computer models of watershed hydrology, 215–232. Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publication.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Aug 15, 2019
Accepted: Feb 21, 2020
Published online: May 31, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 31, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9675-0695. Email: [email protected]
Shenglian Guo [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China. Email: [email protected]
Jong-Suk Kim [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan Univ., Wuhan 430072, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share