Technical Papers
Feb 28, 2020

Climate-Related Trends of Within-Storm Intensities Using Dimensionless Temporal-Storm Distributions

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 5

Abstract

Huff curves are probabilistic time distributions of rainfall expressed as dimensionless cumulative percentages of storm depth and duration. Previous studies have documented development factors, spatial robustness, and the utility of Huff curves in practical applications. However, the effects of trending rainfall on Huff curve intensity patterns have not yet been studied. The goal of this paper is to fill this gap by studying Huff curve patterns in a watershed with demonstrated increasing trends of temperature and precipitation, with the intention that it can be generalized to other areas in the US and the world. To achieve this goal, the high temporal resolution precipitation data collected from a high spatial density, 72-year precipitation-gauge network on the 4.25-km2 North Appalachian Experimental Watershed in east-central Ohio were used. Seasonal storm pattern trends from 1939 to 2010 were investigated using dimensionless depth (with the frequency of 50%, d50) and the curve variability (V=d80-d20) at three dimensionless within-storms time periods (three verticals). The Spearman rank correlation procedure (correlation coefficient, ρ and significance probability, p) was used to statistically determine trends over time using 8 periods of 4-season sets of Huff curves over the 72 years. Two averages of ρ and p were computed: (1) by averaging the individual ρ and p obtained from 10 gauges (AvgI); and (2) by grouped averaging of all individual gauge values of d50 and V and then computing ρ and p (AvgG). The test results of individual gauges showed that 4 cases for d50 and 23 cases for V were significant for all seasons and verticals (total of 120 cases for each variable). The test results of AvgI for d50 and V and AvgG for d50 showed no significant trends in all seasons and verticals. Only the AvgG for V led to a significant trend for V in spring and fall at different times within storm patterns. The data do not provide sufficient evidence at the p=0.05 significance level to reject the null hypothesis of unchanging position of the dimensionless depth of the 50% Huff curves for individual or averages for all seasons and verticals. Also, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis of unchanging variability, V, using the average ρ of individual gauges (AvgI for V) for all seasons and verticals. AvgG results showed a significant trend in V; however, this analysis may be affected by the nonindependence of storm data. The results suggest that it is likely that there is little if any effect of trending climate over approximately 70 years on Huff curve patterns. The results of this study add to the robustness characteristics of Huff curves and to their potential use in hydrological practice as design storms, as the foundation of stochastic storm generation, and for storm disaggregation, and they deserve further investigation. These different forms of inputs to watershed models have the potential to improve runoff estimation. The results suggest that, if verified in other studies, they have applicability to provide useful stationary precipitation patterns across the US and other areas of the world in areas of nonstationary climate. Also, individual rain gauge data may not be representative of trends even over small areas, and seasonal differences were noticeable as found in other studies. Recommendations are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The precipitation data used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to those whose vision led to establishment of the NAEW in the 1930s, and all those who worked at the Coshocton watershed throughout its 81-year history managing the watersheds and collecting the data. We gratefully acknowledge that this research was supported by USDA Agriculture Research Service under the Specific Research Agreement 58-6060-8-008 monitored by the USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory (NSL) and The University of Mississippi (UM).

References

Al-Saadi, R. 2002. “Hyetograph estimation for the State of Texas.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas Tech Univ.
Bonta, J. V. 2004a. “Development and utility of Huff curves for disaggregating precipitation amounts.” Appl. Eng. Agric. 20 (5): 641–653. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17467.
Bonta, J. V. 2004b. “Stochastic simulation of storm occurrence, depth, duration, and within-storm intensities.” Trans. ASAE 47 (5): 1573–1584. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17635.
Bonta, J. V. 2015. “Curve number method response to historical climate variability and trends.” Trans. ASABE 58 (2): 319–334. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10431.
Bonta, J. V., and A. R. Rao. 1987. “Factors affecting development of Huff curves.” Trans. ASAE 30 (6): 1689–1693. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30623.
Bonta, J. V., and A. R. Rao. 1988. “Comparison of four design-storm hyetographs.” Trans. ASAE 31 (1): 0102–0106. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30673.
Bonta, J. V., and A. R. Rao. 1992. “Estimating peak flows from small agricultural watersheds.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 118 (1): 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:1(122).
Bonta, J. V., and A. Shahalam. 2003. “Cumulative storm rainfall distributions: Comparison of Huff curves.” J. Hydrol. (N. Z.) 42 (1): 65–74.
Bonta, J. V., M. J. Shipitalo, and L. Owens. 2018. “Experimental watersheds at Coshocton, Ohio, USA: Experiences and establishing new experimental watersheds.” Accessed February 12, 2020. https://www.intechopen.com/books/hydrology-of-artificial-and-controlled-experiments/experimental-watersheds-at-coshocton-ohio-usa-experiences-and-establishing-new-experimental-watershe.
Carbone, M., M. Turco, G. Brunetti, and P. Piro. 2015. “A Cumulative rainfall function for subhourly design storm in Mediterranean urban areas.” Adv. Meteorol. 2015: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/528564.
EPA. 2019. “Climate change indicators: US and global precipitation.” Accessed February 12, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-us-and-global-precipitation.
Gordji, L., J. V. Bonta, and M. S. Altinakar. 2016. “Trends of extreme precipitation at the north appalachian experimental watershed in East-Central Ohio.” J. Soil Water Conserv. 71 (5): 430–439. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.5.430.
Hartfield, G., J. Blunden, and D. S. Arndt. 2018. “State of the climate in 2017.” Bull. Am. Meteorolog. Soc. 99 (8): Si–S332. https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1.
Hjelmfelt, A. T. 1980. “Time distribution of clock hour rainfall.” In CREAMS, a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems. Washington, DC: USDA.
Huff, F. A. 1990. Time distributions of heavy rainstorms in Illinois. Champaign, IL: Illinois State Water Survey.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. “Climate change 2007: The physical science basis.” In Contribution of Working Group I to the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), edited by S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller, 996. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013. “Climate change 2013: The physical science basis.” In Contribution of Working Group I to the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Karl, T. R., J. M. Melillo, and T. C. Peterson. 2009. Global climate change impacts in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C. S., et al. 2013. “Assessment of sewer flooding model based on ensemble quantitative precipitation forecast.” J. Hydrol. 506 (Dec): 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.053.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric). 2019. “NOAA Atlas 14 Temporal distributions for 6-, 12-, 24-, and 96-hour Durations.” Accessed February 12, 2020. http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_temporal.html.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Washington, DC: Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division.
Nunes, J. P., J. Seixas, and J. J. Keizer. 2013. “Modeling the response of within-storm runoff and erosion dynamics to climate change in two Mediterranean watersheds: A multi-model, multi-scale approach to scenario design and analysis.” Catena 102 (Mar): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.04.001.
Pan, C., X. Wang, L. Liu, H. Huang, and D. Wang. 2017. “Improvement to the huff curve for design storms and urban flooding simulations in Guangzhou, China.” Water 9 (6): 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060411.
Restrepo, P. J., and P. S. Eagleson. 1982. “Identification of independent rainstorms.” J. Hydrol. 55 (1–4): 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90136-6.
SAS (Statistical Analysis Software). 2019. The CORR procedure: Spearman rank-order correlation. Accessed February 12, 2020. www.sas.com.
US Global Change Research Program. 2017. “Climate science special report, fourth national climate assessment (NCA4), volume I, Ch. 7.” Accessed February 12, 2020. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/7/.
Wu, S. Y. 2015. “Changing characteristics of precipitation for the contiguous United States.” J. Clim. Change 132 (4): 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1453-8.
Yin, S.-Q., Y. Xie, M. A. Nearing, W.-L. Guo, and Z.-Y. Zhu. 2016. “Intra-storm temporal patterns of rainfall in China using Huff curves.” Trans. ASABE 59 (6): 1619–1632. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11010.
Zahmatkesh, Z., M. Karamouz, E. Goharian, and S. J. Burian. 2015. “Analysis of the effects of climate change on urban storm water runoff using statistically downscaled precipitation data and a change factor approach.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (7): 05014022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001064.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Jun 14, 2019
Accepted: Nov 21, 2019
Published online: Feb 28, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, Univ. of Mississippi, South Oxford Center, Room 242, P.O. Box 1848, University, MS 38677-1848 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-5807. Email: [email protected]
James V. Bonta, F.ASCE [email protected]
Research Hydraulic Engineer and Collaborator, National Sedimentation Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, 598 McElroy Dr., Oxford, MS 38655. Email: [email protected]
Mustafa S. Altinakar, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Computational Hydroscientist, Decision and Infrastructure Sciences Div., Energy and Global Security Directorate, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439; formerly, Director and Research Professor, National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, Univ. of Mississippi, South Oxford Center, Room 234, P.O. Box 1848, University, MS 38677-1848. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share