Technical Papers
Jun 1, 2017

Unsteady High Velocity Flood Flows and the Development of Rating Curves in a Himalayan Basin under Climate Change Scenarios

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 8

Abstract

Hydrologic models are not able to compute unsteady flood flows, and the hydraulic models are sometimes found less effective in uncertainty estimation in the modeling outcomes. This study presents a coupled modeling framework to analyze the unsteady flows in the downstream of the Teesta and Lachung Rivers using hydrodynamic and hydrological models. The present approach leads to unsteady flow simulations along stream channel reach. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is used for the projection of streamflow, water depth, and precipitation at various gauged and ungauged locations over the selected catchment using Coupled Model Intercomparison Phase 5 (CMIP5) CM3 model data sets with their representative concentration pathway (RCP) experiments and observed hydrometeorological data. SWAT-based projected scenarios are incorporated in the hydrodynamic model for the projection of water level, flood discharge, and flooded area at different sections in the downstream of the Teesta and Lachung Rivers. Using projected flood flows and water-level data, the rating curve equations have been developed at the outlets such as Chungthang and Lachung. The study outcomes resulting from both models show a very good agreement between the simulated streamflow and observed streamflow at the outlet locations. The uncertainties can also be associated in the modeling outcomes. Thus, a statistical-cum-stochastic downscaling method has been applied to downscale the CMIP5 CM3 model-based meteorological variables (e.g., temperature and precipitation). The modeling errors prior to project streamflow have been adjusted using a sequential parameter fitting approach (SUFI2). The hydrodynamic model-based projected unsteady flood flows are found highly uncertain in the downstream portion of both rivers, and thus several extreme flood peaks have been observed in the final outcomes. The observations show that the water velocities have increased in the projected scenarios (recorded as 8.5  m/s), as compared to historical scenarios (6.5  m/s). Using projected time series discharge and water level (stage), the rating curve equations, which have been developed as per the low to extreme emission scenarios, can be used in the future planning and management of the water resources systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research work has been carried out under DST research project No. SB/DGH-66/2013, and financial support is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank GFDL, New Jersey USA, Earth Explorer NASA, CWC New Delhi India, IMD Pune India, and IITM Pune India for providing the required data sets for the completion of this research work.

References

Abbaspour, K. C. (2011). “SWAT-CUP4: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs—A user manual.” Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Abbaspour, K. C., et al. (2007). “Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT.” J. Hydrol., 333(2–4), 413–430.
Arnold, J. G., et al. (2012). “SWAT.” Trans. ASABE, 55(4), 1491–1508.
Change, I. C. (2013). “The physical science basis.”, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York.
DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute). (2004). “MIKE 11 user and reference manual.” Hørsholm, Denmark.
Doulgeris, C., Georgiou, P., Papadimos, D., and Papamichail, D. (2012). “Ecosystem approach to water resources management using the MIKE 11 modeling system in the Strymonas River and Lake Kerkini.” J. Environ. Manage., 94(1), 132–143.
Escurrat, J. J., Vazquez, V., Cestti, R., De Nys, E., and Srinivasan, R. (2014). “Climate change impact on countrywide water balance in Bolivia.” Reg. Environ. Change, 14(2), 727–742.
Ficklin, D. L., and Barnhart, B. L. (2014). “SWAT hydrologic model parameter uncertainty and its implications for hydroclimatic projections in snowmelt-dependent watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 519, 2081–2090.
Gardner, A. S., et al. (2009). “Near-surface temperature lapse rates over Arctic glaciers and their implications for temperature downscaling.” J. Climate, 22(16), 4281–4298.
Gosain, A. K., Rao, S., and Basuray, D. (2006). “Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian river basins.” Curr. Sci., 90(3), 346–353.
Goyal, M. K. (2014). “Modeling of sediment yield prediction using M5 model tree algorithm and wavelet regression.” Water Resour. Manage., 28(7), 1991–2003.
Goyal, M. K., and Ojha, C. S. P. (2010). “Robust weighted regression as a down-scaling tool in temperature projections.” Int. J. Global Warming, 2(3), 234–251.
Huang, M., Gallichand, J., Wang, Z., and Goulet, M. (2006). “A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China.” Hydrol. Processes, 20(3), 579–589.
Jain, S. K., Tyagi, J., and Singh, V. (2010). “Simulation of runoff and sediment yield for a Himalayan watershed using SWAT model.” J. Water Resour. Prot., 2(3), 267–281.
Karahan, H., Gurarslan, G., and Geem, Z. W. (2013). “Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum flood-routing model using a hybrid harmony search algorithm.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 352–360.
Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., and Wehner, M. (2013). “Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble.” Clim. Change, 119(2), 345–357.
Krishna, A. P. (2005). “Snow and glacier cover assessment in the high mountains of Sikkim Himalaya.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(12), 2375–2383.
Mahmood, R., and Babel, M. S. (2013). “Evaluation of SDSM developed by annual and monthly sub-models for downscaling temperature and precipitation in the Jhelum basin, Pakistan and India.” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 113(1–2), 27–44.
Mike 11 [Computer software]. Danish Hydraulic Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Mishra, S. K., Chaudhary, A., Shrestha, R. K., Pandey, A., and Lal, M. (2014). “Experimental verification of the effect of slope and land use on SCS runoff curve number.” Water Resour. Manage., 28(11), 3407–3416.
Mosley, M. P., and McKercher, A. I. (1993). Streamflow. p. 8.1–8.39. Handbook of hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniri, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2011). “Soil water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 9.”, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Patro, S., Chatterjee, C., Singh, R., and Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2009). “Hydrodynamic modelling of a large flood-prone river system in India with limited data.” Hydrol. Processes, 23(19), 2774–2791.
Rahman, M. M., Arya, D. S., Goel, N. K., and Dhamy, A. P. (2011). “Design flow and stage computations in the Teesta River, Bangladesh, using frequency analysis and MIKE 11 modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 176–186.
Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y. K., Gassman, P. W., and Wolter, C. F. (2008). “Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions.” Water Resour. Res., 44(7), 1–12.
Singh, V., Bankar, N., Salunkhe, S. S., Bera, A. K., and Sharma, J. R. (2013). “Hydrological stream flow modeling on Tungabhadra catchment: Parameterization and uncertainty analysis using SWAT CUP.” Current Sci., 104(9), 1187–1199.
Singh, V., and Goyal, M. K. (2016a). “Analysis and trends of precipitation lapse rate and extreme indices over north Sikkim eastern Himalayas under CMIP5ESM-2M RCPs experiments.” Atmos. Res., 167, 34–60.
Singh, V., and Goyal, M. K. (2016b). “Changes in climate extremes by the use of CMIP5 coupled climate models over eastern Himalayas.” Environ. Earth Sci., 75, 839.
Singh, V., Goyal, M. K., and Chu, X. (2015). “Multicriteria evaluation approach for assessing parametric uncertainty during extreme peak and low flow conditions over snow glaciated and inland catchments.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04015044.
Snell, S. E., Gopal, S., and Kaufmann, R. K. (2000). “Spatial interpolation of surface air temperatures using artificial neural networks: Evaluating their use for downscaling GCMs.” J. Clim., 13(5), 886–895.
Soleymani, M., and Delphi, M. (2012). “Comparison of flood routing models (case study: Maroon River, Iran).” World Appl. Sci. J., 16(5), 769–775.
Subash, N., and Sikka, A. K. (2014). “Trend analysis of rainfall and temperature and its relationship over India.” Theor. Appl. Clim., 117(3–4), 449–462.
SWAT [Computer software]. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Temple, TX.
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A. (2012). “An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design (link is external).” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93(4), 485–498.
Thompson, J. R., Gavin, H., Refsgaard, A., Sørenson, H. R., and Gowing, D. J. (2009). “Modelling the hydrological impacts of climate change on UK lowland wet grassland.” Wetlands Ecol. Manage., 17(5), 503–523.
Thompson, J. R., Sorenson, H. R., Gavin, H., and Refsgaard, A. (2004). “Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England.” J. Hydrol., 293(1), 151–179.
Vansteenkiste, T., Tavakoli, M., Ntegeka, V., Willems, P., De Smedt, F., and Batelaan, O. (2013). “Climate change impact on river flows and catchment hydrology: A comparison of two spatially distributed models.” Hydrol. Processes, 27(25), 3649–3662.
Wilby, R. L., Dawson, C. W., Murphy, C., O’Connor, P., and Hawkins, E. (2014). “The statistical downscaling model—Decision centric (SDSM-DC): Conceptual basis and applications.” Clim. Res., 61(3), 259–276.
Zhang, Z., Lu, W., Chu, H., Cheng, W., and Zhao, Y. (2014). “Uncertainty analysis of hydrological model parameters based on the bootstrap method: A case study of the SWAT model applied to the Dongliao River Watershed, Jilin Province, Northeastern China.” Sci. China Technol. Sci., 57(1), 219–229.
Zucco, G., Tayfur, G., and Moramarco, T. (2015). “Reverse flood routing in natural channels using genetic algorithm.” Water Resour. Manage., 29(12), 4241–4267.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 8August 2017

History

Received: Feb 23, 2016
Accepted: Jan 26, 2017
Published online: Jun 1, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vishal Singh
Ph.D. Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India.
Manish Kumar Goyal, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share