Technical Papers
Oct 12, 2016

Data Assimilation for Streamflow Forecasting: State–Parameter Assimilation versus Output Assimilation

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper compares two data assimilation methods: state–parameter assimilation and output assimilation in improving streamflow forecasting using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The state–parameter assimilation is performed by updating the stored water content and soil curve number with the extended Kalman filter (EKF); the output assimilation is carried out by updating the model output errors with autoregressive (AR) models. The performances of the two data assimilation techniques are compared for a dry year and a wet year, and it is found that whereas both methods significantly improve forecasting accuracy, their performances are influenced by the hydrological regime of the particular year. During the wet year, the average root-mean-square error (RMSE) for seven days forecasts is improved from 670.46 to 420.42  m3/s when output assimilation is used, and to 367.60  m3/s when state–parameter assimilation is used. The Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSC) is improved from 0.63 to 0.85 and 0.88, respectively; the mean error (ME) is improved from 375.83  m3/s to 131.68  m3/s and 129.11  m3/s, respectively. For shorter forecast leads (1–4 days), the state–parameter assimilation outperforms output assimilation in both dry and wet years. For longer forecast leads (5–7 days), the output assimilation could provide better results in the wet year. A hybrid method that combines state–parameter assimilation and output assimilation performs very well in both dry and wet years according to all three indicators.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Robert Hart for his proofreading of this paper. The data used in this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 43(1), W01403.
Anctil, F., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V. (2003). “ANN output updating of lumped conceptual rainfall/runoff forecasting models.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(5), 1269–1279.
Anctil, F., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V. (2004). “Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models.” Environ. Modell. Software, 19(4), 357–368.
Angela, L. (1982). “Combination of a conceptual model and an autoregressive error model for improving short time forecasting.” Hydrol. Res., 13(4), 233–246.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, S. R., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Bauer-Gottwein, P., Jensen, I., Guzinski, R., Bredtoft, G., Hansen, S., and Michailovsky, C. (2015). “Operational river discharge forecasting in poorly gauged basins: The Kavango River Basin case study.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19(3), 1469–1485.
Berg, A. A., and Mulroy, K. A. (2006). “Streamflow predictability in the Saskatchewan/Nelson River Basin given macroscale estimates of the initial soil moisture status.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 51(4), 642–654.
Berger, K. P., and Entekhabi, D. (2001). “Basin hydrologic response relations to distributed physiographic descriptors and climate.” J. Hydrol., 247(3), 169–182.
Berthet, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Javelle, P. (2009). “How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 13(6), 819–831.
Beven, K. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology—The case of physically-based models.” J. Hydrol., 105(1), 157–172.
Bidwell, V., and Griffiths, G. (1994). “Adaptive flood forecasting: An application to the Waimakariri River.” J. Hydrol., 32(2), 1–15.
Box, G. E., and Jenkins, G. M. (1976). “Time series analysis: Forecasting and control.” Holden-Day series in time series analysis, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
Brocca, L., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., and Singh, V. (2009). “Assimilation of observed soil moisture data in storm rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 153–165.
Broersen, P. M. (2007). “Error correction of rainfall-runoff models with the ARMAsel program.” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 56(6), 2212–2219.
Broersen, P. M., and Weerts, A. H. (2005). “Automatic error correction of rainfall-runoff models in flood forecasting systems.” Proc., IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf., 2005. IMTC 2005, IEEE, New York.
Chen, F., Crow, T. W., and Ryu, D. (2014). “Dual forcing and state correction via soil moisture assimilation for improved rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Hydrometeorol., 15(5), 1832–1848.
Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Singh, P. V., Guo, S., and Zhang, J. (2015). “Real-time error correction method combined with combination flood forecasting technique for improving the accuracy of flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol., 521(Feb), 157–169.
Choi, B. (2012). ARMA model identification, Springer, New York.
Clark, M. P., et al. (2008). “Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model.” Adv. Water Resour., 31(10), 1309–1324.
Cloke, H., and Pappenberger, F. (2009). “Ensemble flood forecasting: A review.” J. Hydrol., 375(3), 613–626.
De Kleermaeker, S., and Verkade, J. (2013). “A decision support system for use of probability forecasts.” ISCRAM 2013: Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM Association, KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Evensen, G. (1994). “Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics.” J. Geophys. Res., 99(C5), 10143–10162.
Garen, D. C. (1992). “Improved techniques in regression-based streamflow volume forecasting.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 654–670.
Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D.-J., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B. (2004). “Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles.” J. Hydrol., 298(1), 222–241.
Hendricks Franssen, H., and Kinzelbach, W. (2008). “Real-time groundwater flow modeling with the ensemble Kalman filter: Joint estimation of states and parameters and the filter inbreeding problem.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09408.
Hopmans, J. W., Nielsen, R. D., and Bristow, K. L. (2002). “How useful are small-scale soil hydraulic property measurements for large-scale vadose zone modeling?” Heat and mass transfer in the natural environment, the philip volume. D. Smiles, P. A. C. Raats, and A. Warrick, eds., Geophysical Monograph Series, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 129, 247–258.
Jacobs, J. M., Myers, A. D., and Whitfield, B. M. (2003). “Improved rainfall/runoff estimates using remotely sensed soil moisture.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 313–324.
Jain, A., and Srinivasulu, S. (2004). “Development of effective and efficient rainfall-runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 40(4), W04302.
Javelle, P., Fouchier, C., Arnaud, P., and Lavabre, J. (2010). “Flash flood warning at ungauged locations using radar rainfall and antecedent soil moisture estimations.” J. Hydrol., 394(1–2), 267–274.
Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., and Arnold, J. G. (2005). “Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(3), 749–762.
Jeevaragagam, P., and Simonovic, S. P. (2013). “Improvement of streamflow simulation for gauged site of hydrological model.” Malaysian J. Civ. Eng., 25(2), 239–253.
Jeong, D. I., and Kim, Y.-O. (2009). “Combining single-value streamflow forecasts—A review and guidelines for selecting techniques.” J. Hydrol., 377(3), 284–299.
Kalman, R. E. (1960). “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems.” Trans. ASME–J. Basic Eng., 82(Series D), 35–45.
Khac-Tien Nguyen, P., and Hock-Chye Chua, L. (2012). “The data-driven approach as an operational real-time flood forecasting model.” Hydrol. Processes, 26(19), 2878–2893.
Kitanidis, P. K., and Bras, R. L. (1980a). “Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model. I: Analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 16(6), 1025–1033.
Kitanidis, P. K., and Bras, R. L. (1980b). “Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model. II: Applications and results.” Water Resour. Res., 16(6), 1034–1044.
Krzysztofowicz, R. (1999). “Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model.” Water Resour. Res., 35(9), 2739–2750.
Krzysztofowicz, R. (2001). “The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1), 2–9.
Liu, Y., and Gupta, H. V. (2007). “Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework.” Water Resour. Res., 43(7), W07401.
Lü, H., et al. (2010). “Using a H filter assimilation procedure to estimate root zone soil water content.” Hydrol. Processes, 24(25), 3648–3660.
Lü, H., Yu, Z., Zhu, Y., Drake, S., Hao, Z., and Sudicky, E. A. (2011). “Dual state-parameter estimation of root zone soil moisture by optimal parameter estimation and extended Kalman filter data assimilation.” Adv. Water Resour., 34(3), 395–406.
Madsen, H., and Skotner, C. (2005). “Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting—A combined filtering and error forecasting procedure.” J. Hydrol., 308(1), 302–312.
Massari, C., Brocca, L., Moramarco, T., Tramblay, Y., and Lescot, J.-F. D. (2014). “Potential of soil moisture observations in flood modelling: Estimating initial conditions and correcting rainfall.” Adv. Water Resour., 74(Dec), 44–53.
McMillan, H., Hreinsson, E., Clark, M., Singh, S., Zammit, C., and Uddstrom, M. (2013). “Operational hydrological data assimilation with the recursive ensemble Kalman filter.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(1), 21–38.
Mehra, R. K. (1972). “Approaches to adaptive filtering.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 17(5), 693–698.
Montzka, C., et al. (2013). “Estimation of radiative transfer parameters from L-band passive microwave brightness temperatures using advanced data assimilation.” Vadose Zone J., 12(3), in press.
Moradkhani, H. (2008). “Hydrologic remote sensing and land surface data assimilation.” Sensors, 8(5), 2986–3004.
Moradkhani, H., Hsu, L. K., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2005a). “Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter.” Water Resour. Res. Water Resour. Res., 41(5), W05012.
Moradkhani, H., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V. H., and Houser, P. R. (2005b). “Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter.” Adv. Water Resour., 28(2), 135–147.
Muluye, G. Y. (2011). “Improving long-range hydrological forecasts with extended Kalman filters.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 56(7), 1118–1128.
Pagano, T., Wang, Q., Hapuarachchi, P., and Robertson, D. (2011). “A dual-pass error-correction technique for forecasting streamflow.” J. Hydrol., 405(3), 367–381.
Pham, D. T. (2001). “Stochastic methods for sequential data assimilation in strongly nonlinear systems.” Monthly Weather Rev., 129(5), 1194–1207.
Puente, C. E., and Bras, R. L. (1987). “Application of nonlinear filtering in the real-time forecasting of river flows.” Water Resour. Res., 23(4), 675–682.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., Dumedah, G., and Moradkhani, H. (2014). “Assessing model state and forecasts variation in hydrologic data assimilation.” J. Hydrol., 513(May), 127–141.
Sene, K. (2008). Flood warning, forecasting and emergency response, Springer, Berlin.
Srinivasan, R., Ramanarayanan, S. T., Arnold, G. J., and Bednarz, S. T. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. II: Model application.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 91–101.
Ssegane, H., Tollner, E., Mohamoud, Y., Rasmussen, T., and Dowd, J. (2012). “Advances in variable selection methods. I: Causal selection methods versus stepwise regression and principal component analysis on data of known and unknown functional relationships.” J. Hydrol., 438–439(May), 16–25.
Sun, L., Nistor, I., and Seidou, O. (2015). “Streamflow data assimilation in SWAT model using extended Kalman filter.” J. Hydrol., 531(Dec), 671–684.
Tingsanchali, T., and Gautam, M. R. (2000). “Application of tank, NAM, ARMA and neural network models to flood forecasting.” Hydrol. Processes, 14(14), 2473–2487.
Todini, E. (1988). “Rainfall-runoff modeling—Past, present and future.” J. Hydrol., 100(1), 341–352.
Todini, E. (2007). “Hydrological catchment modelling: Past, present and future.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 468–482.
Velázquez, J., Anctil, F., Ramos, M., and Perrin, C. (2011). “Can a multi-model approach improve hydrological ensemble forecasting? A study on 29 French catchments using 16 hydrological model structures.” Adv. Geosci., 29(Feb), 33–42.
Vrugt, J. A., Diks, G. C., Gupta, V. H., Bouten, W., and Verstraten, J. M. (2005). “Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation.” Water Resour. Res., 41(1), W01017.
Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, V. H., Nualláin, B., and Bouten, W. (2006). “Real-time data assimilation for operational ensemble streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol., 7(3), 548–565.
Walker, J. P., and Houser, P. R. (2001). “A methodology for initializing soil moisture in a global climate model: Assimilation of near-surface soil moisture observations.” J. Geophys. Res., 106(D11), 11761–11774.
Wan, E. A., and Van Der Merwe, R. (2000). “The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation.” Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symp. 2000. AS-The, SPCC, IEEE 2000, IEEE, New York.
Wang, D., and Cai, X. (2008). “Robust data assimilation in hydrological modeling—A comparison of Kalman and H-infinity filters.” Adv. Water Resour., 31(3), 455–472.
Weerts, A. H., and El Serafy, G. Y. (2006). “Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 42(9), W09403.
Wu, S.-J., Lien, H.-C., Chang, C.-H., and Shen, J.-C. (2012). “Real-time correction of water stage forecast during rainstorm events using combination of forecast errors.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 26(4), 519–531.
Xiong, L., and O’Connor, K. M. (2002). “Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 47(4), 621–639.
Yu, P.-S., and Chen, S.-T. (2005). “Updating real-time flood forecasting using a fuzzy rule-based model/Mise à Jour de Prévision de Crue en Temps Réel Grâce à un Modèle à Base de Règles Floues.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 50(2), 265–278.
Zealand, C. M., Burn, H. D., and Simonovic, S. P. (1999). “Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol., 214(1), 32–48.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 3March 2017

History

Received: Nov 12, 2015
Accepted: Aug 5, 2016
Published online: Oct 12, 2016
Published in print: Mar 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, 161, Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0842-2262. E-mail: [email protected]
Ousmane Seidou
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, 161, Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5.
Ioan Nistor
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, 161, Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share