Technical Papers
Mar 29, 2016

Evidence and Implications of Nonlinear Flood Response in a Small Mountainous Watershed

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 8

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of event characteristics on runoff dynamics during extreme flood events observed in an 8.5-km2 experimental watershed located in South Korea. A high-quality data set containing the 31 most extreme flood events with event rainfall in excess of 50 mm were analyzed using an event-based rainfall-runoff model; the revitalized flood hydrograph (ReFH) routinely used for design flood estimation in the United Kingdom. The ReFH model was fitted to each event in turn, and links were investigated between each of the two model parameters controlling runoff volume and response time, respectively, and event characteristics such as rainfall depth, duration, and intensity, and also antecedent soil moisture. The results show no link between the parameter controlling runoff volume and any of the event characteristics, but identified a dependence between response time and rainfall depth. These results show that the linear unit hydrograph fails to adequately represent a reduction in watershed response time observed for the more extreme events. A new and dynamic link between the unit hydrograph shape and rainfall depth is introduced. The consequence of the observed nonlinearity in response time is to increase design peak flow by between 50% for a 10-year return period, and up to 80% when considering the probable maximum flood.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (11-TI-C06) from the Advanced Water Management Research Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the Korean government. The authors would like to thank Mr. Dongpil Kim (KICT) for supporting the raw data hydrologic data from the Seolma-Cheon experimental catchment. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for very helpful discussions of earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

Archer, D. R., and Fowler, H. J. (2015). “Characterising flash flood response to intense rainfall and impacts using historical information and gauged data in Britain.” J. Flood Risk Manage., in press.
Banasik, K., Krajewski, A., Sikorska, A., and Hejduk, L. (2014). “Curve number estimation for a small urban catchment from recorded rainfall-runoff events.” Arch. Environ. Prot., 40(3), 75–86.
Chow, V., Maidment, D., and Mays, L. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
Eagleson, P. S. (1972). “Dynamics of flood frequency.” Water Resour. Res., 8(4), 878–898.
Efstratiadis, A., Koussis, A. D., Koutsoyiannis, D., and Mamassis, N. (2014). “Flood design recipes vs. reality: Can predictions for ungauged basins be trusted?” Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1417–1428.
Faulkner, D., and Barber, S. (2009). “Performance of the revitalised flood hydrograph method.” J. Flood Risk Manage., 2(4), 254–261.
Grimaldi, S., Petrosellid, A., Tauroce, F., and Porfiric, M. (2012). “Time of concentration: A paradox in modern hydrology.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 57(2), 217–228.
Hawkins, R. H., Ward, T. J., Woodward, D. E., and Van Mullem, J. A. (2009). Curve number hydrology, ASCE, Reston, VA, 106.
Heo, J.-H. (2007). “Rainfall frequency analysis using FARD 2006.” Workshop textbook, Korea Water Resources Association, Seoul, South Korea, 95–176.
IOEA (Institution of Engineers Australia). (2001). Australian rainfall and runoff: A guide to flood estimation, D. H. Pilgrim, ed., Vol. 1, Barton, ACT, Australia.
Joo, J., Kjeldsen, T. R., Kim, H.-J., and Lee, H. (2014). “A comparison of two event-based flood models (ReFH-rainfall runoff model and HEC-HMS) at two Korean catchments, Bukil and Jeungpyeong.” Korean J. Civ. Eng., 18(1), 330–343.
Jung, S., and Moon, J. (2001). “The comparison of existing synthetic unit hydrograph method in Korea.” J. Korean Water Res. Assoc., 34(6), 659–672.
Kang, M., et al. (2013). “Estimating design floods based on the critical storm duration for small watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Environ. Res., 7(3), 209–218.
KICT (Korean Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology). (2010). “Operation and research on the hydrological characteristics of the experimental catchment.”, Goyang-Si, South Korea, 178 (in Korean).
Kim, S.-H., Ahn, S.-R., Jang, C.-H., and Kim, S.-J. (2013). “Applicability test of U.K. design flood estimation model FEH-ReFH to Korean Namcheon watershed.” J. Korean Assoc. Geog. Info. Stud., 16(3), 68–80.
Kjeldsen, T. (2007). “The revitalised FSR/FEH rainfall-runoff method—A user handbook.”, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, U.K.
Kokkonen, T., Koivusalo, H., Karvonen, T., Croke, B., and Jakeman, A. (2004). “Exploring streamflow response to effective rainfall across event magnitude scale.” Hydrol. Processes, 18(8), 1467–1486.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Napiórkowski, J. J. (1986). “Nonlinear models of dynamic hydrology.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 31(2), 163–185.
McIntyre, N. (2013). “Apportioning non-linearity in conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Examples from upland U.K. catchments.” Hydrol. Res., 44(6), 965–981.
MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime). (2012). Manual of flood estimation calculation, Seoul (in Korean).
Moore, R. (2007). “The PDM rainfall-runoff model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 483–499.
NERC (Natural Environment Research Council). (1975)., London.
Packman, J., and Kidd, C. (1980). “A logical approach to the design storm concept.” Water Resour. Res., 16(6), 994–1000.
Pilgrim, D. H., and Cordey, I. (1992). “Flood runoff.” Handbook of hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 9–1.
Ponce, V. M., and Hawkins, R. H. (1996). “Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11–19.
Smithers, J. (2012). “Methods for design flood estimation in South Africa.” Water SA, 38(4), 633–646.
Stewart, D., Canfield, E., and Hawkins, R. (2012). “Curve number determination methods and uncertainty in hydrologic soil groups from semiarid watershed data.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1180–1187.
Svensson, C., Kjeldsen, T. R., and Jones, D. A. (2013). “Flood frequency estimation using a joint probability approach within a Monte Carlo framework.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 58(1), 8–27.
Szilagyi, J. (2007). “Analysis of the nonlinearity in the hillslope runoff response to precipitation through numerical modeling.” J. Hydrol., 337(3), 391–401.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 8August 2016

History

Received: Mar 8, 2015
Accepted: Nov 7, 2015
Published online: Mar 29, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas R. Kjeldsen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
Hyeonjun Kim, Ph.D.
Dept. of Water Resources and Environment Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 2311, Daehwa-dong, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 411-712, Republic of Korea; Dept. of Construction Environment Engineering, Univ. of Science and Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Republic of Korea.
Cheol-Hee Jang, Ph.D.
Dept. of Water Resources and Environment Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 2311, Daehwa-dong, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 411-712, Republic of Korea.
Hyosang Lee, Ph.D. [email protected]
School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National Univ., Cheongju 361-763, South Korea (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share