Abstract
Stormwater wet detention ponds hold a permanent pool of water and offer many beneficial uses including flood mitigation, pollution prevention, downstream erosion control, increased aesthetics, and recreational uses. The reduction efficiency of nutrients is generally low in stormwater wet detention ponds in many urban areas. To enhance nutrient reduction, floating treatment wetlands (FTWs), which are a new best management practice (BMP) in stormwater management, can be installed in wet detention ponds to offer an innovative solution toward naturally removing excess nutrients and aiding in stormwater management. This study assesses nutrient reduction in three Floridian stormwater wet detention ponds where FTWs have recently been installed. Both episodic (storm event) and routine (nonstorm event) sampling campaigns were carried out at the three ponds located in Ruskin, Gainesville, and Orlando. Most notably, nutrient reduction rates after installation of the FTWs reached levels of 33% for total nitrogen at the Ruskin pond during storm events, 71% for total phosphorus at the Gainesville pond during storm events, and 17% for total nitrogen at the Orlando pond during nonstorm events.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support of this project provided by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (Grant No. BDK7897709). The Florida Department of Transportation has not reviewed or accepted this material. The authors wish to thank Beeman’s Nursery for providing floating mats and plants. Assistance with experimental and field setup by Mr. Benjamin Vannah, Mr. James Crawford, Mr. Golam Mohiuddin, Ms. Carolina Monzo, and Ms. Jessica Cormier is also gratefully acknowledged.
References
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., and Burkholder, J. M. (2002). “Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences.” Estuaries, 25(4), 704–726.
Baxter, R. (2012). “The use of nutrient credits in Virginia.” 〈http://www.slideshare.net/CleanH2O/the-use-of-nutrient-credits-in-virginia〉 (Jan. 2015).
Cappiella, K., David, H., and Bill, S. (2013). “Using nutrient credits and offsets to achieve stormwater compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL: A discussion paper.” Center for Watershed Protection, 〈http://www.cwp.org/using-nutrient-credits-and-offsets-to-achieve-stormwater-compliance-with-the-chesapeake-bay-tmdl-a-discussion-paper/〉 (Jan. 2015).
Chang, N. B., Islam, K., and Wanielista, M. (2012). “Floating wetland mesocosm assessment of nutrient removal to reduce ecotoxicity in stormwater ponds.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 9(3), 453–462.
Chang, N.-B., Wanielista, M. P., Xuan, Z., and Marimon, Z. A. (2014). “Floating treatment wetlands for nutrient removal in a subtropical stormwater wet detention pond with a fountain.” Chapter 16, Developments in environmental modeling, Vol. 26, Elsevier, 437–467.
FDEP (Florida Department of Environmental Protection). (2013). “Implementation of Florida’s numeric nutrient standards.” 〈http://www.dep.state.fl.us/secretary/news/2013/03/NNC_Implementation_3-11-13.pdf〉 (Jan. 2015).
Govindarajan, B. (2008). “Nitrogen dynamics in a constructed wetland receiving plant nursery runoff in southeastern United States.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Harper, H., and Baker, D. (2007). “Evaluation of current stormwater design criteria within the state of Florida.” Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, 〈http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/nonpoint/docs/nonpoint/SW_TreatmentReportFinal_71907.pdf〉 (Jan. 2015).
Headley, T. R., and Tanner, C. C. (2006). “Application of floating wetlands for enhanced stormwater treatment: A review.” Auckland Regional Council, 〈http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/council/documents/technicalpublications/TP324%20-%20Floating%20Wetland%20Review-Final.pdf〉 (Jan. 2015).
Hubbard, R. K. (2010). “Floating vegetated mats for improving surface water quality.” Emerging environmental technologies, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
JMP 11 [Computer software]. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Kadlec, R., and Scott, W. (2009). Treatment wetlands, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Kadlec, R. H. (2009). “Wastewater treatment at the Houghton lake wetland: Hydrology and water quality.” Ecol. Eng., 35(9), 1287–1311.
Olsen, S. R., and Watanabe, F. S. (1970). “Diffusive supply of phosphorus in relation to soil textural variations.” Soil Sci., 110(5), 318–327.
Sample, D. J., and Laurie, J. F. (2013). “Innovative best management fact sheet No. 1: Floating treatment wetlands.” 〈https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/BSE/BSE-76/BSE-76-PDF.pdf〉 (Jan. 2015).
Tanner, C. C., and Tom, R. H. (2011). “Components of floating emergent macrophyte treatment wetlands influencing reduction of stormwater pollutants.” Ecol. Eng., 37(3), 474–486.
Van de Moortel, A. M. K., Meers, E., De Pauw, N., and Tack, F. M. G. (2010). “Effects of vegetation, season and temperature on the removal of pollutants in experimental floating treatment wetlands.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 212(1–4), 281–297.
Vazquez-Burney, R., Jeffrey, H., James, B., Kerstin, K., and Ryan, M. (2015). “Reuse water reservoirs help meet nitrogen total maximum daily load: Do floating wetland islands help?” Florida Water Resour. J., 24–30.
Vymazal, J. (2007). “Reduction of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands.” Sci. Total Environ., 380(1–3), 48–65.
Wanielista, M. P., Chang, N. B., Chopra, M., Xuan, Z., Islam, K., and Marimon, Z. (2012). “Floating wetland systems for nutrient removal in stormwater ponds.” 〈http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/nonpoint/docs/nonpoint/final-report-ucf-fdotbeemats.pdf〉 (Nov. 12, 2014).
White, S. A., and Cousins, M. M. (2013). “Floating treatment wetland aided remediation of nitrogen and phosphorus from simulated stormwater runoff.” Ecol. Eng., 61, 207–215.
White, S. A., Taylor, M. D., Chandler, S. L., Whitwell, T., and Klaine, S. J. (2010). “Remediation of nitrogen and phosphorus from nursery runoff during the spring via free water surface constructed wetlands.” J. Environ. Hortic., 28(4), 209–217.
Wright Water Engineers and Geosyntec Consultants. (2007). “Frequently asked questions fact sheet for the international stormwater BMP database: Why does the international stormwater BMP database project omit percent reduction as a measure of BMP performance?” 〈www.bmpdatabase.org〉 (Jan. 2015).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 8 • August 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 6, 2015
Accepted: Jan 21, 2016
Published online: Mar 29, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.