Technical Papers
Feb 4, 2016

A Stochastic Optimization Algorithm for Optimizing Flood Risk Management Measures Including Rainfall Uncertainties and Nonphysical Flood Damages

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 5

Abstract

One of the basic assumptions usually made by researchers for obtaining optimal designs of flood mitigation measures that take into account the associated uncertainties is consideration of flood damage probability directly correlated with flood event probability. The present work demonstrates that this assumption leads to 42% underestimation of expected damages for the case study of the Kan River basin near the capital city of Iran, Tehran. To eliminate this limitation, in this paper, inherent rainfall uncertainties are included through random sampling techniques and simulation-based optimization approaches. A Monte Carlo simulation method is employed to generate multivariate synthetic rainfalls, which are then imported in a rainfall-runoff model. This model gives the flood hydrographs of subbasins for hydraulic routing in waterways of the watershed by a hydraulic model, considering different flood mitigation measures. These models are then coupled with the NSGA-II optimization algorithm to provide optimal Pareto solutions considering two competitive objectives of minimizing investment costs and expected physical and nonphysical damages in the flood-prone areas. The results obtained by applying the proposed hybrid model to a watershed show that some designs that seem inappropriate in terms of benefit-to-cost ratios may still be valuable for decision makers when nonphysical vulnerabilities are considered. Experimental results also showed that neglecting the spatial dependence of rainfalls throughout the watershed may lead to up to 26% underestimation of the calculated expected annual flood damages (EADs).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abrishamchi, A., Afshar, A., and Kerachian, R. (2003). “Spillway capacity optimization under hydrologic uncertainties and flood routing.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. B, 27(B1), 111–122.
Afshar, A., and Marino, M. A. (1990). “Optimizing spillway capacity with uncertainty in flood estimator.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 71–84.
Afshar, A., Rasekh, A., and Afshar, M. H. (2009). “Risk-based optimisation of large flood diversion systems, using genetic algorithms.” Eng. Optim., 41(3), 259–273.
Ahmad, S. S., and Simonovic, S. B. (2011). “A three-dimensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis.” J. Flood Risk Manage., 4(1), 53–74.
APFM. (2009). “Integrated flood management, concept paper, world meteorological organization.”, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Switzerland.
Barreto, W. (2012). “Multi-objective optimization for urban drainage rehabilitation.” Ph.D. thesis, Delft Univ. of Technology and of the Academic Board of the UNESCO-IHE, Delft, Netherlands.
Belman, R. (1957). Dynamic programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Bialas, W. F., and Loucks, D. P. (1978). “Nonstructural floodplain planning.” Water Resour. Res., 14(1), 67–74.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Day, J. C. (1970). “A recursive programming model for non-structural flood damage control.” J. Water Resour. Res., 6(5), 1262–1271.
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., and Meyarivan, T. (2000). “A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimisation: NSGA-II.”, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
DEFRA. (2007). “The costs of the summer 2007 floods in England.”, Environment Agency, Almondsbury, Bristol, U.K.
Delelegn, S. W., Pathirana, A., Gersonius, B., Adeogun, A. G., and Vairavamoorthy, K. (2011). “Multi-objective optimisation of cost-benefit of urban flood management using a 1D2D coupled model.” Water Sci. Technol., 63(5), 1054–1059.
Golian, S., Saghafian, B., Elmi, M., and Maknoon, R. (2011). “Probabilistic rainfall thresholds for flood forecasting: Evaluating different methodologies for modelling rainfall spatial correlation (or dependence).” J. Hydrol. Process, 25(13), 2046–2055.
Helton, J. C., and Davis, F. J. (2003). “Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 81(1), 23–69.
Hershfield, D. M. (1961). “Rainfall frequency atlas of the United States.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, 115.
Jonkman, S. N., and Vrijling, J. K. (2008). “Loss of life due to foods.” J. Flood Risk Manage., 1(1), 43–56.
Karamouz, M., Abesi, O., Moridi, A., and Ahmadi, A. (2008). “Development of optimization schemes for floodplain management: A case study.” Water Resour. Manage., 23(9), 1743–1761.
Lekuthai, A., and Vongvisessomjai, S. (2001). “Intangible flood damage quantification.” J. Water Resour. Manage., 15(5), 343–362.
Lund, J. R. (2002). “Floodplain planning with risk-based optimization.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 202–207.
Markantonis, V., Meyer, V., and Schwarze, R. (2012). “Review article “Valuating the intangible effects of natural hazards—Review and analysis of the costing methods”.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1633–1640.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
Melching, C. S. (1995). “Reliability estimation.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, 69–118.
Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Meyer, V., Tunstall, S., and Veen, D. (2007). “Evaluating flood damages: Guidance and recommendations on principles and models.”, Sixth Framework Programme for European Research and Technological Development, Integrated Project Flood Site, HR Wallingford, Oxfordshire, U.K.
Meyer, V., et al. (2005). “Estimating injury and loss of life in floods: A deterministic framework.” Nat. Hazard., 36(1–2), 43–64.
MIKE11 [Computer software]. Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), Denmark.
Morin, T. L., Merier, W. L., and Nagaraj, K. S. (1989). Dynamic programming for flood dynamic programming for optimal water systems analysis, A. O. Esogbue, ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 286–306.
Penning-Rowsell, E., Floyd, P., Ramsbottom, D., and Surendran, S. (2005). “Estimating injury and loss of life in floods: A deterministic framework.” Nat. Hazards, 36, 43–64.
Sherestha, D. L. (2009). “Uncertainty analysis in rainfall-runoff modelling: Application of machine learning techniques.” UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands.
Sun, S. A., Djordjevic, S., and Khu, S. T. (2011). “A general framework for flood risk-based storm sewer network design.” Urban Water J., 8(1), 13–27.
Travis, Q. B., and Mays, L. W. (2008). “Optimizing retention basin networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 432–439.
Tung, Y. K., and Bao, Y. (1990). “On the optimal risk-based design of highway drainage structures.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 4(4), 295–308.
Tung, Y. K., Yen, B. C., and Melching, C. S. (2005). Hydrosystems engineering reliability assessment and risk analysis, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2000). Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: Technical reference manual, Davis, CA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2008). “Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS, Quick start guide, version 3.2 April 2008.” Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
WRI (Water Research Institute). (2011). “Technical reports of the project: Integrated flood management, case study: Kan basin.” Ministry of Energy, Iran.
Yazdi, J. (2013). “Optimisation of flood control system on watershed scale under flood uncertainties.” Ph.D. thesis, Tarbiat Modares Univ., Tehran, Iran.
Yazdi, J., and Neyshabouri, S. A. A. (2012a). “Assessing flood vulnerability using rule-based fuzzy system.” J. Water Sci. Technol., 66(8), 1766–1773.
Yazdi, J., and Salehi Neyshabouri, S. A. A. (2012b). “Simulation-based optimisation model for flood management on a watershed scale.” J. Water Resour. Manage., 26(15), 4569–4586.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 5May 2016

History

Received: Mar 23, 2015
Accepted: Oct 30, 2015
Published online: Feb 4, 2016
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jul 4, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Abbaspour School of Engineering, Shahid Beheshti Univ., Shahid Abbaspour Blvd., 1658953571 Tehran, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
B. Zahraie
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, Enghelab Square, 111554563 Tehran, Iran.
S. A. A. Salehi Neyshabouri
Professor, Tarbiat Modares Univ., Jalal-Al-Ahmad, 14115143 Tehran, Iran.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share