Technical Papers
Apr 5, 2013

Influence of Spatial Precipitation Sampling on Hydrological Response at the Catchment Scale

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 3

Abstract

Retrieving precipitation data from a rain gauge network is a classical and common practice in hydrology and climatology. These data represent the key input in hydrological modeling to reproduce, for example, the characteristics of a flood phenomenon. The accuracy of the model results is strongly dependent on the consistency of the monitoring network in terms of spatial scale, i.e., network density and location of the rain gauges and time resolution. In this context, several studies have been carried out to analyze how the rainfall sampling influences the estimation of total runoff volume. The aim of this paper is to use a physically based and distributed-parameter hydrologic model to investigate how the number and the spatial distribution of a rain gauge network influence the estimation of the hydrograph and its characteristics in conjunction with different spatial and temporal characteristics of rainfall forcing and different soil-type characteristics. The TIN-based real-time integrated basin simulator (tRIBS) hydrologic model was used to simulate hydrologic response at Baron Fork Basin, Oklahoma. Downscaled next-generation radar (NEXRAD) measurements were assumed to represent the true precipitation distribution over the basin. Additional precipitation fields have been derived from the interpolation of eight fictitious rain gauges randomly placed in the area. The hydrological response from tRIBS that is driven by these precipitation fields has been compared with the response of the model forced with NEXRAD precipitation. The analysis has been carried out assuming first simplified spatial distributions of soil characteristics and then the real soil-type distribution. Results have shown the dependence of the best rain gauges configuration for the estimation of runoff on the spatiotemporal characteristics of storm events and the soil-type distribution.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Arnaud, P., Bouvier, C., Cisneros, L., and Dominguez, R. (2002). “Influence of rainfall spatial variability on flood prediction.” J. Hydrol., 260(1–4), 216–230.
Bardossy, A., and Das, T. (2008). “Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12(1), 77–89.
Bardossy, A., and Plate, E. (1992). “Space-time model for daily rainfall using atmospheric circulation patterns.” Water Resour. Res., 28(5), 1247–1259.
Bell, V. A., and Moore, R. J. (2000). “The sensitivity of catchment runoff models to rainfall data at different spatial scales.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4(4), 653–667.
Eagleson, P. S. (1967a). “A distributed linear model for peak catchment discharge.” Proc., Int. Hydrology Symp., Vol. 1, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO, 1–8.
Eagleson, P. S. (1967b). “Optimum density of rainfall networks.” Water Resour. Res., 3(4), 1021–1033.
Eagleson, P. S., and Shack, W. J. (1966). “Some criteria for the measurement of rainfall and runoff.” Water Resour. Res., 2(3), 427–436.
Faurès, J. M., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol., 173(1–4), 309–326.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D. (2004a). “Catchment hydrologic response with a fully-distributed triangulated irregular network model.” Water Resour. Res., 40(11), W11102.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D. (2004b). “Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: A fully-distributed physically-based approach.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 80–111.
Krajewski, W. F., Ciach, G. J., and Habib, E. (2003). “An analysis of small-scale rainfall variability in different climatic regimes.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(2), 151–162.
Krajewski, W. F., Lakshmi, V., Georgakakos, K. P., and Jain, S. C. (1991). “A Monte-Carlo study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model.” Water Resour. Res., 27(1), 119–128.
Liuzzo, L., Noto, L. V., Vivoni, E. R., and La Loggia, G. (2010). “Basin-scale water resources assessment in Oklahoma under synthetic climate change scenarios using a fully distributed hydrological model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 107–122.
Lopes, V. L. (1996). “On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modeling.” Catena, 28(1–2), 107–119.
Meselhe, E. A., Habib, E. H., Oche, O. C., and Gautam, S. (2009). “Sensitivity of conceptual and physically based hydrologic models to temporal and spatial rainfall sampling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 711–720.
Noto, L. V., Ivanov, V. Y., Bras, R. L., and Vivoni, E. R. (2008). “Effects of initialization on response of a fully-distributed hydrologic model.” J. Hydrol., 352(1–2), 107–125.
Obled, C., Wedling, J., and Beven, K. (1994). “The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: An evaluation using observed data.” J. Hydrol., 159(1–4), 305–333.
Perica, S., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1996). “A model for multiscale disaggregation of spatial rainfall based on coupling meteorological and scaling descriptions.” J. Geophys. Res., 101(D21), 26347–26361.
Schuurmans, J. M., and Bierkens, M. F. P. (2007). “Effect of spatial distribution of daily rainfall on interior catchment response of a distributed hydrological model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(2), 677–693.
St-Hilarie, A., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Lachance, M., Bobèe, B., Gaudet, J., and Gibnac, C. (2003). “Assessment of the impact of meteorological network density on the estimation of basin precipitation and runoff: a case study.” Hydrol. Process., 17(18), 3561–3580.
Sun, H., Cornish, P. S., and Daniell, T. M. (2002). “Spatial variability in hydrologic modeling using rainfall-runoff model and digital elevation model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 404–412.
Tabios, G. Q., and Salas, J. D. (1985). “A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation.” Water Resour. Bull., 21(3), 365–380.
Vivoni, E. R., et al. (2006). “Extending the predictability of hydrometeorological flood events using radar rainfall nowcasting.” J. Hydrometeorol., 7(4), 660–677.
Wilson, C. B., Valdes, J. B., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1979). “On the influence of the spatial distribution of rainfall on storm runoff.” Water Resour. Res., 15(2), 321–328.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 3March 2014
Pages: 544 - 553

History

Received: Aug 17, 2012
Accepted: Apr 4, 2013
Published online: Apr 5, 2013
Discussion open until: Sep 5, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Domenico Caracciolo [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali (DICAM), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo 90128, Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Elisa Arnone, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali (DICAM), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo 90128, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Leonardo Valerio Noto, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali (DICAM), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo 90128, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share