Case Studies
Nov 9, 2012

Effects of Land Use Change on Hydrologic Response at a Watershed Scale, Arkansas

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 12

Abstract

The population has increased at a fast pace in the last two decades in Arkansas. One direct result from this process is urbanization, especially in northwest Arkansas. Land use and land cover (LULC) had been changed from forests, pastures, and farmland to urbanized areas over a short time span. Increased flood discharge and decreased water quality have been negative side effects of urbanization on the environment. In this study, five watersheds were selected as representative of the entire state. These watersheds were selected to examine the hydrological response to land use change over the last two decades in Arkansas. The curve number, a term used to describe the runoff depth, was calculated for the five watersheds. Out of the five watersheds, the Illinois River watershed experienced the greatest change in land use from 1993–2006, whereas the other four watersheds experienced slight land use change. The land transformation model (LTM) was used to forecast the land use of the Illinois River watershed in the year 2019. Simulated urbanized area in the Illinois River watershed from 1993–2019 increased from 3.7 to 23.6%. The curve number of the Illinois River watershed would increase from 68.9 in 1993 to 72.1 in 2019. The Spring Creek-Osage Creek watershed, a subwatershed in the Illinois River watershed, was selected for detailed evaluation of the hydrologic response attributable to land use change. The storm water management model (SWMM) was used to calculate the flood discharges resulting from different storm events. The simulation results showed that during 1993–2019, the peak flood discharge of the Spring Creek-Osage Creek watershed for the storm return periods 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years increased 230, 180, 160, 140, 130, and 110%, respectively, whereas the total flood volume increased 270, 220, 200, 170, 160, and 140%. The results in this study might suggest to small cities like Bethel Heights that it is better to plan the drainage systems for the coming decades before such cities have already sprawled. This study also applies a combined methodology of a regional scale urbanization-flood model, which could be used to improve flood frequency analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anderson, D. G. (1970). “Effects of urban development on floods in northern Virginia.”, Washington, DC.
Arkansas Geographic Information Office (AGIO). (2011). GeoStro 6.0, 〈http://www.geostor.arkansas.gov/G6/Home.html〉 (Feb. 3, 2011).
Arkansas Watershed Information System (AWIS). (2011). “A module of the Arkansas Automated Reporting and Mapping System.” 〈http://watersheds.cast.uark.edu〉 (Feb. 24, 2011).
Arnell, N. W. (2011). “Incorporating climate change into water resources planning in England and Wales.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 47(3), 541–549.
Baffaut, C., and Delleur, J. W. (1990). “Calibration of SWMM runoff quality model with expert system.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 116(2), 247–261.
Bathurst, J. C., et al. (2011). “Forest impact on floods due to extreme rainfall and snowmelt in four Latin American environments 1: Field data analysis.” J. Hydrol., 400(3–4), 281–291.
Bledsoe, B. P., and Watson, C. C. (2001). “Effects of urbanization on channel instability.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(2), 255–270.
Booth, D. B., Hartley, D., and Jackson, R. (2002). “Forest cover, impervious-surface area, and the mitigation of stormwater impacts.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(3), 835–845.
Boughton, W. C. (1989). “A review of the USDA SCS curve number method.” Aust. J. Soil Res., 27(3), 511–523.
Davis, A. (2006). Land transformation model (LTM) tutorial, 〈http://ltm.agriculture.purdue.edu/LTM_Tutorial/default.htm〉 (Mar. 4, 2011).
DeFries, R., and Eshleman, K. N. (2004). “Land-use change and hydrologic processes: A major focus for the future.” Hydrol. Processes, 18(11), 2183–2186.
Fohrer, N., Haverkamp, S., Eckhardt, K., and Frede, H. G. (2001). “Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale.” Phys. and Chem. of the Earth B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 26(7–8), 577–582.
Foley, J. A., et al. (2005). “Global consequences of land use.” Science, 309(5734), 570–574.
Galloway, G. E. (2011). “If stationarity is dead, what do we do now?” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 47(3), 563–570.
Gironás, J., Roesner, L. A., Rossman, L. A., and Davis, J. (2010). “A new applications manual for the storm water management model (SWMM).” Environ. Modell. Software, 25(6), 813–814.
Harris, E. E., and Rantz, S. E. (1964). “Effect of urban growth on streamflow regimen of Permanente Creek Santa Clara County California.”, Washington, DC.
Hodge, S. A., and Tasker, G. D. (1995). “Magnitude and frequency of floods in Arkansas.”, Little Rock, AR.
Howard, J. M., Colton, G. W., and Prior, W. L. (1997). Mineral, fossil fuel, and water resources of Arkansas, Arkansas Geological Commission, Little Rock, AR.
Hundecha, Y., and Bárdossy, A. (2004). “Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 292(1–4), 281–295.
Keen-Zebert, A. (2007). “Channel responses to urbanization: Scull and Mud Creeks in Fayetteville, Arkansas.” Phys. Geog., 28(3), 249–260.
Kiang, J. E., Rolf Olsen, J., and Waskom, R. M. (2011). “Introduction to the featured collection on ‘nonstationarity, hydrologic frequency analysis, and water management’.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 47(3), 433–435.
Kibler, D. F., Froelich, D. C., and Aron, G. (1981). “Analyzing urbanization impacts on Pennsylvania flood peaks.” Water Resour. Bull., 17(2), 270–274.
Kleindl, W. (1995). “A benthic index of biotic integrity for Puget Sound lowland streams, Washington, USA.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2011). “Nonstationarity in water resources—Central European perspective.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 47(3), 550–562.
Mason, R. R., King, J. N., Thomas, W. O., and Baker, M. (1999). “The national flood-frequency program—Methods for estimating flood magnitude and frequency in rural areas in Arkansas.”, Reston, VA.
May, C. W. (1996). “Assessment of cumulative effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound lowland ecoregion: Implications for salmonid resource management.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Meierdiercks, K. L., Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., and Miller, A. J. (2010). “Analysis of urban drainage network structure and its impact on hydrologic response.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46(5), 932–943.
Mishra, S. K., Sahu, R. K., Eldho, T. I., and Jain, M. K. (2006). “An improved IaS relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology.” Water Resour. Manage., 20(5), 643–660.
Mohamoud, Y. (2004). “Comparison of hydrologic responses at different watershed scales.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Morley, S. A. (2000). “Effects of urbanization on the biological integrity of Puget Sound lowland streams: Restoration with a biological focus.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). (2011). Geospatial data gateway, 〈http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/〉 (Feb. 4, 2011).
Pijanowski, B. C., Alexandridis, K. T., and Müller, D. (2006). “Modelling urbanization patterns in two diverse regions of the world.” J. Land Use Sci., 1(2–4), 83–108.
Pijanowski, B. C., Brown, D. G., Shellito, B. A., and Manik, G. A. (2002a). “Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: A land transformation model.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 26(6), 553–575.
Pijanowski, B. C., Gage, S. H., and Long, D. T. (2000). “A land transformation model: Integrating policy, socioeconomics and environmental drivers using a geographic information system.” Landscape ecology: A top down approach, L. Harris and J. Sanderson, eds., Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 183–198.
Pijanowski, B. C., Pithadia, S., Shellito, B. A., and Alexandridis, K. (2005). “Calibrating a neural network-based urban change model for two metropolitan areas of the upper midwest of the United States.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci., 19(2), 197–215.
Pijanowski, B. C., Shellito, B., Pithadia, S., and Alexandridis, K. (2002b). “Forecasting and assessing the impact of urban sprawl in coastal watersheds along eastern Lake Michigan.” Lakes Reservoirs Res. Manage., 7(3), 271–285.
Rossman, L. A. (2004). “Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
Shi, P. J., Yuan, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, J. A., Ge, Y., and Qiu, G. Y. (2007). “The effect of land use/cover change on surface runoff in Shenzhen region, China.” Catena, 69(1), 31–35.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.”, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
Svoboda, A. (1991). “Changes in flood regime by use of the modified curve number method.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 36(5), 461–470.
Tang, Z., Engel, B. A., Pijanowski, B. C., and Lim, K. J. (2005). “Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale.” J. Environ. Manage., 76(1), 35–45.
Tong, S. T. Y., and Chen, W. (2002). “Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality.” J. Environ. Manage., 66(4), 377–393.
Tsihrintzis, V. A., and Hamid, R. (1998). “Runoff quality prediction from small urban catchments using SWMM.” Hydrol. Processes, 12(2), 311–329.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Census data 2010, 〈http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/〉 (Jun. 6, 2011).
Wehmeyer, L. L., Weirich, F. H., and Cuffney, T. F. (2011). “Effect of land cover change on runoff curve number estimation in Iowa, 1832–2001.” Ecohydrol., 4(2), 315–321.
Williams, J. R., and LaSeur, W. V. (1976). “Water yield model using SCS curve numbers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 102(HY9), 1241–1253.
Woods, A. J., Omernik, J. O., and Brown, D. D. (1999). Level III and IV ecoregions of Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Lab, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 12December 2013
Pages: 1779 - 1785

History

Received: Feb 24, 2012
Accepted: Nov 7, 2012
Published online: Nov 9, 2012
Discussion open until: Apr 9, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hongxiang Yan [email protected]
S.M.ASCE
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Findlay G. Edwards, Ph.D. [email protected]
F.ASCE
Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share