Scaling of the Network Instantaneous Response Function from Basin Geomorphology and Hydraulic Geometry
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 12
Abstract
A challenging problem in basin-scale hydrology is the ability to represent and quantify the nonlinearity of the output hydrograph or response. An important aspect of this challenge is to clearly distinguish among different sources of nonlinearity. To address the previous, a scale-dependent network instantaneous response function (IRF) is obtained by using the theory of transport by travel times, relationships of basin geomorphology, hydraulic geometry, and the inverse Gaussian (IG) distribution. Inverse Gaussian is used to represent the network response because of its connection with diffusion processes. It is shown that both geometric and hydraulic regularity in the stream network, together with the scaling property of IG, can result in the network response being approximately scaling, implying in turn that the peak flow and time to peak of the response are scaling as well. The derived IRF has the advantage over previous formulations of explicitly distinguishing between nonlinearity and scaling. In addition, it provides an explanation for the scaling in terms of well-known hydrogeomorphic relationships. The scaling is found to arise from the dependence of the network length (i.e., the mean path length) and hydraulic geometry, specifically the mean velocity and the cross-sectional area, on the basin size. Moreover, after dividing the network travel times by the mean travel time, a response that is independent of scale is obtained. This response can be seen as analogous to the instantaneous unit hydrograph but representing instead the output associated with a unit travel time. Furthermore, the derived IRF may be useful in design applications as it provides a way for estimating the response across basin sizes by using readily available data sets. For the latter, additional comparison against observed data is necessary to better understand the applicability of the proposed scaling under a variety of climatic and terrain scenarios.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Chhikara, R. S., and Folks, L. (1989). The inverse Gaussian distribution: Theory, methodology, and applications, Marcel-Dekker, New York.
Ding, J. Y. (2011). “A measure of watershed nonlinearity: Interpreting a variable instantaneous unit hydrograph model on two vastly different sized watersheds.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(1), 405–423.
Goodrich, D. C., Lane, L. J., Shillito, R. M., Miller, S. N., Syed, K. H., and Woolhiser, D. A. (1997). “Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semi-arid watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 33(12), 2951–2965.
Leopold, L. B., and Maddock, T. J. (1953). “The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications.”, Washington, DC.
Marani, A., Rigon, R., and Rinaldo, A. (1991). “A note on fractal channel networks.” Water Resour. Res., 27(12), 3041–3049.
Mejia, A. I., and Reed, S. M. (2011). “Role of channel and floodplain cross-section geometry in the basin response.” Water Resour. Res., 47(9), W09518.
Minshall, N. E. (1960). “Predicting storm runoff on small experimental watersheds.” J. Hydraul. Div., 86(8), 17–38.
Olivera, F., and Koka, S. (2004). “Hydrodynamic dispersive and advective processes in watershed responses.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(6), 534–543.
Paik, K., and Kumar, P. (2004). “Hydraulic geometry and the nonlinearity of the network instantaneous response.” Water Resour. Res., 40(3), W03602.
Rinaldo, A., Marani, A., and Rigon, R. (1991). “Geomorphological dispersion.” Water Resour. Res., 27(4), 513–525.
Robinson, J., Sivapalan, M., and Snell, J. (1995). “On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 31(12), 3089–3101.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Rinaldo, A. (1997). Fractal river basins, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Saco, P. M., and Kumar, P. (2002). “Kinematic dispersion in stream networks 1. Coupling hydraulic and network geometry.” Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 26-1–26-14.
Sivapalan, M., Jothityangkoon, C., and Menabde, M. (2002). “Linearity and nonlinearity of basin response as a function of scale: Discussion of alternative definitions.” Water Resour. Res., 38(2), 4-1–4-5.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18 • Issue 12 • December 2013
Pages: 1786 - 1789
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 20, 2011
Accepted: Dec 4, 2012
Published online: Dec 6, 2012
Discussion open until: May 6, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.