Technical Papers
Oct 18, 2012

Implications of Hyporheic Flow on Temperature-Based Estimates of Groundwater/Surface Water Interactions

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 10

Abstract

The hyporheic zone has received significant attention in recent years due to its role in regulating the physical, chemical, and biological processes that buffer fluvial systems at a variety of scales. The exchange of water through the hyporheic zone is also important for the regulation of stream and streambed temperatures. Recent research has utilized stream and streambed temperatures to quantify groundwater discharge to streams using a variety of methods, including one-dimensional analytical solutions for vertical flux across the streambed interface. The presence of lateral flows, including hyporheic flow, will cause uncertainty in these analytical solution results. In this study, HydroGeoSphere, a three-dimensional, fully integrated surface/subsurface hydrologic model, is used to simulate the manner in which streambed heterogeneity influences groundwater/surface water interactions along a stream section, and the uncertainty of groundwater/surface water flux estimates based upon streambed temperatures. Groundwater/surface water exchange fluxes from numerical experiments of an idealized linear reach with homogeneous and heterogeneous streambed materials are compared to the results of a one-dimensional analytical solution of groundwater discharge to a stream using the numerically simulated temperature results. Both low- and high-variance distributions of hydraulic conductivity (ln K variances of 0.85 and 17.0, respectively) along the streambed caused hyporheic flow, which caused significant discrepancies between the numerical and analytical groundwater/surface water flux results. A low variance in hydraulic conductivity did result in smaller discrepancies between the numerical and analytical solutions compared to the higher-variance simulations; however, the discrepancies between the low-K-variance simulations and the associated analytical solution interpretation still differed by up to an order in magnitude. The quantity of hyporheic flow increased with increased depth of heterogeneous streambed sediments, causing greater discrepancies between the analytical estimate and the numerical solution of groundwater/surface water exchange. In all simulations the analytical solution underestimated the exchange flux, and in the presence of hyporheic flow, the analytical solution was unable to capture the patterns of exchange flux at the streambed. The three-dimensional modeling approach produced an increase in the lateral flow components within the streambed compared to results inferred from one- and two-dimensional models employed in previous research. This three-dimensional approach enabled analysis of the spatial variability of error between the analytical and numerical results and determined that in environments with lateral flows, including hyporheic flow, the analytical solution is indicative of the patterns of the vertical component of fluid flow to the streambed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

Amsler, M. L., Blettler, M. C., and de Drago, I. E. (2009). “Influence of hydraulic conditions over dunes on the distribution of the benthic macroinvertebrates in a large sand bed river.” Water Resour. Res., 45(6), W06426.
Anderson, M. (2005). “Heat as a groundwater tracer.” Ground Water, 43(6), 951–968.
Battin, T. J., et al. (2008). “Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks.” Nat. Geosci., 1(2), 95–100.
Bencala, K. E. (2005). “Hyporheic exchange flows.” Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, M. G. Anderson, ed., Wiley, New Jersey.
Boano, F., Camporeale, C., Revelli, R., and Ridolfi, L. (2006). “Sinuosity-driven hyporheic exchange in meandering rivers.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(18), L18406.
Boano, F., Revelli, R., and Ridolfi, L. (2007). “Bedform-induced hyporheic exchange with unsteady flows.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(1), 148–156.
Briggs, M. A., Lautz, L. K., and MacKenzie, J. M. (2012). “A comparison of fibre-optic distributed temperature sensing to traditional methods of evaluating groundwater flow to streams.” Hydrol. Proc., 26(9), 1277–1290.
Brookfield, A. E., Sudicky, E. A., Park, Y.-J., and Conant, B., Jr. (2009). “Thermal transport modeling in a fully integrated surface/subsurface framework.” Hydrol. Proc., 23(15), 2150–2164.
Brunke, M., and Gonser, T. (1997). “The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater.” Freshwater Biol., 37(1), 1–33.
Cardenas, M. B. (2008). “The effect of river bend morphology on flow and timescales of surface water-groundwater exchange across pointbars.” J. Hydrol., 362(1–2), 134–141.
Cardenas, M. B. (2009). “Stream-aquifer interactions and hyporheic exchange in gaining and losing sinuous streams.” Water Resour. Res., 45(6), W06429.
Cardenas, M. B. (2010). “Thermal skin effect of pipes in streambeds and its implications on groundwater flux estimation using diurnal temperature signals.” Water Resour. Res., 46(3), W03536.
Cardenas, M. B., Harvey, J. W., Packman, A. I., and Scott, D. T. (2008). “Ground-based thermography of fluvial systems at low and high discharge reveals potential complex thermal heterogeneity driven by flow variation and bioroughness.” Hydrol. Proc., 22(7), 980–986.
Cardenas, M. B., Wilson, J. L., and Zlotnik, V. A. (2004). “Impact of heterogeneity, bed form, and stream curvature on subchannel hyporheic exchange.” Water Resour. Res., 40(8), W08307.
Conant, B., Jr. (2004). “Delineating and quantifying ground water discharge zones using streambed temperatures.” Ground Water, 42(2), 243–257.
Constantz, J. (2008). “Heat as a tracer to determine streambed water exchanges.” Water Resour. Res., 44(4), W00D10.
Edwards, R. T. (1998). “The hyporheic zone.” River ecology and management: Lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion, R. J. Naiman and R. E. Bilby, eds., Springer, New York, 399–429.
Fanelli, R. M., and Lautz, L. K. (2008). “Patterns of water, heat, and solute flux through streambeds around small dams.” Ground Water, 46(5), 671–687.
Ferguson, G., and Bense, V. (2011). “Uncertainty in 1D heat-flow analysis to estimate groundwater discharge to a stream.” Ground Water, 49(3), 336–347.
Gelhar, L. W. (1993). Stochastic subsurface hydrology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gooseff, M. N., Anderson, J. K., Wondzell, S. M., LaNier, J., and Haggerty, R. (2006). “A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA.” Hydrol. Proc., 20(11), 2443–2457.
Gordon, R. P., Lautz, L. K., Briggs, M. A., and McKenzie, J. M. (2012). “Automated calculation of vertical pore-water from field temperature time series using the VFLUX method and computer program.” J. Hydrol., 420–421, 142–158.
Hannah, D. M., Malcolm, I. A., and Bradley, C. (2009). “Seasonal hyporheic temperature dynamics over riffle bedforms.” Hydrol. Proc., 23(15), 2178–2194.
Hatch, C. E., Fisher, A. T., Revenaugh, J. S., Constantz, J., and Ruehl, C. (2006). “Quantifying surface water-groundwater interactions using time series of streambed thermal records: Method development.” Water Resour. Res., 42(10), W10410.
Hester, E. T., and Doyle, M. W. (2008). “In-stream geomorphic structures as drivers of hyporheic exchange.” Water Resour. Res., 44(3), W03417.
Jensen, J. K., and Engesgaard, P. (2011). “Nonuniform groundwater across a streambed: Heat as a tracer.” Vadose Zone J., 10(1), 98–109.
Kalbus, E., Schmidt, C., Molson, J. W., Reinstorf, F., and Schirmer, M. (2009). “Influence of aquifer and streambed heterogeneity on the distribution of groundwater discharge.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(1), 69–77.
Keery, J., Binley, A., Crook, N., and Smith, J. W. N. (2007). “Temporal and spatial variability of groundwater-surface water fluxes: Development and application of an analytical method using temperature time series.” J. Hydrol., 336(1–2), 1–16.
Krause, S., et al. (2011). “Inter-disciplinary perspectives on processes in the hyporheic zone.” Ecohydrology, 4(4), 481–499.
Lautz, L. K. (2010). “Impacts of nonideal field conditions on vertical water velocity estimates from streambed temperature time series.” Water Resour. Res., 46(1), W01509.
Loheide, II, S. P., and Gorelick, S. M. (2006). “Quantifying stream-aquifer interactions through the analysis of remotely sensed thermographic profiles and in situ temperature histories.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(10), 3336–3341.
Loheide, II, S. P., and Lundquist, J. D. (2009). “Snowmelt-induced diel fluxes through the hyporheic zone.” Water Resour. Res., 45(7), W07404.
Marklund, L. (2009). “Topographic control of groundwater flow.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Munz, M., Oswald, S. E., and Schmidt, C. (2011). “Sand box experiments to evaluate the influence of subsurface temperature probe design on temperature based water flux calculation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(11), 3495–3510.
Rau, G. C., Andersen, M. S., and Acworth, R. I. (2012). “Experimental investigation of the thermal dispersivity term and its significance in the heat transport equation for flow in sediments.” Water Resour. Res., 48(3), W03511.
Rau, G. C., Andersen, M. S., McCallum, A. M., and Acworth, R. I. (2010). “Analytical methods that use natural heat as a tracer to quantify surface water-groundwater exchange, evaluated using field temperature records.” Hydrogeol. J., 18(5), 1093–1110.
Rubin, Y. (2003). Applied stochastic hydrogeology, Oxford University Press, New York.
Salehin, M., Packman, A. I., and Paradis, M. (2004). “Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous streambeds: Laboratory experiments and modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 40(11), W11504.
Sawyer, A. H., and Cardenas, M. B. (2009). “Hyporheic flow and residence time distributions in heterogeneous cross-bedded sediment.” Water Resour. Res., 45(8), W08406.
Schmidt, C., Bayer-Raich, M., and Schirmer, M. (2006). “Characterization of spatial heterogeneity of groundwater-stream water interactions using multiple depth streambed temperature measurements at the reach scale.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10(6), 849–859.
Schmidt, C., Conant, B., Bayer-Raich, M., and Schirmer, M. (2007). “Evaluation and field-scale application of an analytical method to quantify groundwater discharge using mapped streambed temperatures.” J. Hydrol., 347(3–4), 292–307.
Schornberg, C., Schmidt, C., Kalbus, E., and Fleckenstein, J. H. (2010). “Simulating the effects of geologic heterogeneity and transient boundary conditions on streambed temperatures—Implications for temperature-based water flux calculations.” Adv. Water Resour., 33(11), 1309–1319.
Schuetz, T., and Weiler, T. (2011). “Quantification of localized groundwater inflow into streams using ground-based infrared thermography.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 38(3), L03401.
Selker, J., van de Giesen, N., Westhoff, M., and Luxemburg, W. (2006). “Fiber optics opens window on stream dynamics.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(24), L24401.
Shanafield, M., Hatch, C., and Pohll, G. (2011). “Uncertainty in thermal time series analysis estimates of streambed water flux.” Water Resour. Res., 47(3), W03504.
Soto-Lopez, C. D., Meixner, T., and Ferré, T. P. A. (2011). “Effects of measurement resolution on the analysis of temperature time series for stream-aquifer flux estimation.” Water Resour. Res., 47(12), W12602.
Stonedahl, S. H., Harvey, J. W., Wörman, A., Salehin, M., and Packman, A. I. (2010). “A multiscale model for integrating hyporheic exchange from ripples to meanders.” Water Resour. Res., 46(12), W12539.
Storey, R. G., Howard, K. W. F., and Williams, D. D. (2003). “Factors controlling riffle-scale hyporheic flows and their seasonal changes in a gaining stream: A three-dimensional groundwater flow model.” Water Resour. Res., 39(2), 1034–1050.
Swanson, T. E., and Cardenas, M. B. (2011). “Ex-Stream: A MATLAB program for calculating fluid flux through sediment-water interfaces based on steady and transient temperature profiles.” Comput. Geosci., 37(10), 1664–1669.
Therrien, R., McLaren, R. G., Sudicky, E. A., and Panday, S. M. (2007). HydroSphere: A three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport, Groundwater Simulations Group, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Tonina, D., and Buffington, J. M. (2011). “Effects of stream discharge, alluvial depth and bar amplitude on hyporheic flow in pool-riffle channels.” Water Resour. Res., 47(8), W08508.
Turcotte, D., and Schubert, G. (1982). Geodynamics: Application of continuum physics to geological problems, Wiley, New York.
Vogt, T., Schneider, P., Hahn-Woernle, L., and Cirpka, O. A. (2010). “Estimation of seepage rates in a losing stream by means of fiber-optic high-resolution vertical temperature profiling.” J. Hydrol., 380(1–2), 154–164.
Ward, A. S., Fitzgerald, M., Gooseff, M. N., Voltz, T. J., Binley, A. M., and Signha, K. (2012). “Hydrologic and geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange during base flow recession in a headwater mountain stream.” Water Resour. Res., 48(4), W04513.
Webb, B. W., Hannah, D. M., Moore, R. D., Brown, L. E., and Nobilis, F. (2008). “Recent advances in stream and river temperature research.” Hydrol. Proc., 22(7), 902–918.
Westhoff, M. C., et al. (2007). “A distributed stream temperature model using high resolution temperature observations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(4), 1469–1480.
Woessner, W. W. (2000). “Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought.” Ground Water, 38(3), 423–429.
Wondzell, S. M. (2006). “Effect of morphology and discharge on hyporheic exchange flows in two small streams in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, USA.” Hydrol. Proc., 20(2), 267–287.
Wondzell, S. M., LaNier, J., Haggerty, R., Woodsmith, R. D., and Edwards, R. T. (2009). “Changes in hyporheic exchange flow following experimental wood removal in a small, low-gradient stream.” Water Resour. Res., 45(5), W05406.
Wörman, A., Packman, A. I., Marklund, L., Harvey, J. W., and Stone, S. H. (2006). “Exact three-dimensional spectral solution to surface-groundwater interactions with arbitrary surface topography.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(7), L07402.
Wörman, A., Packman, A. I., Marklund, L., Harvey, J. W., and Stone, S. H. (2007). “Fractal topography and subsurface water flows from fluvial bedforms to the continental shield.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 34(7), L07402.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 10October 2013
Pages: 1250 - 1261

History

Received: Dec 22, 2011
Accepted: Oct 17, 2012
Published online: Oct 18, 2012
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrea E. Brookfield [email protected]
Kansas Geological Survey, Univ. of Kansas, 1930 Constant Ave., Lawrence, KS 66047 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Edward A. Sudicky
Dept. of Earth Sciences, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share