Technical Papers
Oct 1, 2012

WEHY-HCM for Modeling Interactive Atmospheric-Hydrologic Processes at Watershed Scale. I: Model Description

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 10

Abstract

Among the key problems in atmospheric and hydrologic sciences are the modeling of the interaction between the atmosphere and land surface hydrology while also quantifying the surface/subsurface hydrologic flow processes both in vertical and lateral directions, and modeling the heterogeneity in surface and subsurface hydrologic processes. Meanwhile, in standard water resources engineering practice, the planning and management of the water resources is performed over the geographical region of a watershed. To address these issues, a model of coupled atmospheric-hydrologic processes at the watershed scale, the Watershed Environmental Hydrology Hydro-Climate Model (WEHY-HCM), has been developed. The atmospheric model PSU/NCAR MM5 (Fifth Generation Mesoscale Model) was coupled to the watershed hydrology model WEHY through the atmospheric boundary layer to form the WEHY-HCM. The WEHY-HCM is especially useful for producing nonexistent atmospheric data as input to the modeling of surface and subsurface hydrologic processes at sparsely gauged or ungauged watersheds. The continuously changing state of the atmospheric boundary layer may be essential information in the computation of evapotranspiration (ET) rates and other land surface fluxes. Because such land surface fluxes are the result of the interaction of land surface hydrologic processes with atmospheric processes, their realistic estimation necessitates the coupled modeling of these processes, as is done in the WEHY-HCM. The model is also useful at watersheds that have heterogeneous topography and land use/cover because the main model components are based on areally averaged, scalable conservation equations and parameters in order to quantify and account for the effect of heterogeneity within watersheds. In this paper, the modeling of an integrated system of atmospheric processes aloft coupled with atmospheric boundary layer processes, land surface processes, and surface and subsurface hydrologic processes is described at the scale of a watershed within the framework of WEHY-HCM.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ament, F., and Simmer, C. (2006). “Improved representation of land-surface heterogeneity in a non-hydrostatic numerical weather prediction model.” Boundary Layer Meteorol., 121(1), 153–174.
Anderson, M. L., Chen, Z. Q., Kavvas, M. L., and Yoon, J. (2007). “Reconstructed historical atmospheric data by dynamic downscaling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(2), 156–162.
Anthes, R. A., and Warner, T. T. (1978). “Development of hydrodynamic models suitable for air pollution and other mesometeorological studies.” Mon. Weather Rev., 106, 1045–1078.
Avissar, R. (1991). “A statistical-dynamical approach to parameterize subgrid-scale land surface heterogeneity in climate models.” Surv. Geophys., 12, 155–178.
Avissar, R., and Pielke, R. A. (1989). “A parameterization of heterogeneous land surface for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology.” Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 2113–2136.
Beven, K. J., and Kirkby, M. J. (1979). “A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology.” Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24, 43–69.
Chen, Z. Q., Govindaraju, R. S., and Kavvas, M. L. (1994a). “Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields. 1. Development of models.” Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 523–533.
Chen, Z. Q., Govindaraju, R. S., and Kavvas, M. L. (1994b). “Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields. 2. Numerical solutions.” Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 535–548.
Chen, Z. Q., Kavvas, M. L., Fukami, K., Yoshitani, J., and Matsuura, T. (2004a). “Geomorphologic and soil hydraulic parameters for watershed environmsental hydrology (WEHY) model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(6), 465–479.
Chen, Z. Q., Kavvas, M. L., Fukami, K., Yoshitani, J., and Matsuura, T. (2004b). “Watershed environmental hydrology (WEHY) model: Model application.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(6), 480–490.
Chen, Z. Q., Kavvas, M. L., Ohara, N., Anderson, M. L., and Yoon, J. (2011). “A coupled regional hydro-climate model and its application to the Tigris-Euphrates basin.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(12), 1059–1070.
Deardorff, J. W. (1978). “Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with inclusion of layer of vegetation.” J. Geophys. Res., 83, 1889–1903.
Decharme, B., Douville, H., Boone, A., Habets, F., and Noilhan, J. (2006). “Impact of an exponential profile of saturated hydraulic conductivity within the ISBA LSM: Simulations over the Rhone basin.” J. Hydrometeor., 7, 61–80.
Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P. J., and Wilson, M. F. (1986). “Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR CCM.” TN-275+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO.
Dunne, T. (1978). “Field studies of hillslope flow processes.” Chapter 7, Hillslope hydrology, M. J. Kirkby, ed., Wiley, London, 227–293.
Entekhabi, D., and Eagleson, P. (1989). “Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability.” J. Clim., 2(8), 816–831.
Famiglietti, J. S., and Wood, E. F. (1991). “Evapotranspiration and runoff from large land areas: Land surface hydrology for atmospheric general circulation models.” Surv. Geophys., 12, 179–204.
Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R. (1995). “A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5).” NCAR technical note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 117.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D. (2004). “Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model.” Water Resour. Res., 40, W11102,.
Kampf, S. K., and Burges, S. J. (2007). “A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models.” Water Resour. Res., 43(5), W05423.
Kavvas, M. L., et al. (1998). “A regional-scale land surface parameterization based on areally-averaged hydrological conservation equations.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 43(4), 611–631.
Kavvas, M. L., et al. (2004). “Watershed environmental hydrology (WEHY) model, based on upscaled conservation equations: Hydrologic module.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(6), 450–464.
Kure, S., Kavvas, M. L., Ohara, N., and Jang, S. (2011). “Upscaling of coupled land surface process modeling for heterogeneous landscapes: Stochastic approach.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(12), 1017–1029.
Liang, X., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1994). “A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models.” J. Geophys. Res., 99(D7), 14415–14428.
Liang, X., and Xie, Z. (2001). “A new surface runoff parameterization with subgrid-scale soil heterogeneity for land surface models.” Adv. Water Resour., 24, 1173–1193.
Marion, J. M., Or, D., Rolston, D. E., Kavvas, M. L., and Biggar, J. W. (1994). “Evaluation of methods for determining soil-water retentivity and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 158(1), 1–13.
Noilhan, J., and Planton, S. (1989). “A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models.” Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 536–549.
Ohara, N., and Kavvas, M. L. (2006). “Field observations and numerical model experiments for the snowmelt process at a field site.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(2), 194–211.
Ohara, N., Kavvas, M. L., and Chen, Z. Q. (2008). “Stochastic upscaling for snow accumulation and melt processes with PDF approach.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(12), 1103–1118.
Pielke, R. A., Walko, L., Steyaert, L., Vidale, P. L., Liston, G. E., and Lyons, W. A. (1999). “The influence of anthropogenic landscape changes on weather in south Florida.” Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 1663–1673.
Rubin, J. (1966). “Theory of rainfall uptake by soils initially drier than field capacity and its applications.” Water Resour. Res., 2, 739–749.
Rubin, J., Steinhardt, R., and Reiniger, P. (1964). “Soil water relations during rain infiltration: Moisture content profiles during rains of low intensity.” Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 28, 1–5.
Sellers, P. J., et al. (1997). “Modeling the exchanges of energy, water and carbon between continents and the atmosphere.” Science, 275, 502–509.
Seuffert, G., Gross, P., and Simmer, C. (2002a). “The influence of hydrologic modeling on the predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of a mesoscale weather prediction model and a land surface hydrologic model.” J. Hydrometeor., 3, 505–523.
Seuffert, G., Gross, P., Simmer, C., and Wood, E. F. (2002b). “The influence of hydrologic modeling on the predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of a mesoscale weather prediction model and a land surface hydrologic model.” J. Hydrometeor., 3, 505–523.
Shaaban, A. J., Amin M. Z. M., Chen Z. Q., and Ohara, N. (2011). “Regional modeling of climate change impact on Peninsular Malaysia water resources.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(12), 1040–1049.
Shukla, J., and Mintz, Y. (1982). “Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the earth’s climate.” Science, 215, 1498–1501.
Stieglitz, M., Rind, D., Famiglietti, J., and Rosenzweig, C. (1997). “An efficient approach to modeling the topographic control of surface hydrology for regional and global climate modeling.” J. Clim., 10(1), 118–137.
Stull, R. B. (1988). An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Kluwer, London.
Takata, K., Emori, S., and Watanabe, T. (2003). “Development of the minimal advanced treatments of surface interaction and runoff.” Global Planet. Change, 38(1–2), 209–222.
Vincendon, B., et al. (2010). “Benefit of coupling the ISBA land surface model with a TOPMODEL hydrologic model version dedicated to Mediterranean flash-floods.” J. Hydrol., 394(1–2), 256–266.
Walko, R. L., et al. (2000). “Coupled atmosphere-biophysics-hydrology models for environmental modeling.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 39(6), 931–944.
Wigmosta, M. S., Vail, L. W., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1994). “A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain.” Water Resour. Res., 30, 1665–1679.
Yoshitani, J., Chen, Z. Q., Kavvas, M. L., and Fukami, K. (2009). “Atmospheric model-based streamflow forecasting at small mountainous watersheds by a distributed hydrologic model: Application to a watershed in Japan.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(10), 1107–1118.
Yoshitani, J., Kavvas, M. L., and Chen, Z.-Q. (2001). “Regional-scale hydroclimate model.” Chapter 4, Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology, Vol. 1, V. P. Singh and D. K. Frevert, eds., Water Resources Publications, LLC, Colorado, 237–282.
Yoshitani, J., Kavvas, M. L., and Chen, Z.-Q. (2011). “Application of a coupled regional-scale hydrological-atmospheric model to Japan for climate change study.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(12), 1050–1058.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 10October 2013
Pages: 1262 - 1271

History

Received: Dec 22, 2011
Accepted: Sep 30, 2012
Published online: Oct 1, 2012
Discussion open until: Mar 1, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. L. Kavvas [email protected]
F.ASCE
Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
M.ASCE
California Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA 95814. E-mail: [email protected]
M.ASCE
Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
M.ASCE
Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share