CASE STUDIES
Jan 22, 2010

Application of a Distributed Hydrologic Model to the November 17, 2004, Flood of Bull Creek Watershed, Austin, Texas

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 8

Abstract

This study presents a hydrologic analysis of a flood event that took place over a small urbanizing watershed in Austin, Texas. The physically based, distributed-parameter gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) hydrologic model was used to simulate the watershed response to a very high-intensity rain event. The hydrologic model was forced by both gauge-observed and multisensor precipitation estimator (MPE) rainfall input. Observed discharge was compared to GSSHA-generated hydrograph under various degrees of representation of the watershed physiography. In addition, simulation hydrographs by GSSHA using five different model grid sizes were compared in order to evaluate the effect of grid size on model predictions. The simulation hydrograph for the model using a 30-m grid cell generally compared well to the observed flow data once the effects of storm water detention were simulated. The comparison of simulation results from models using 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 m grid size highlighted the loss of accuracy as the model grid size is increased. Driving the hydrologic model by data from the two rain gauges existing on the watershed resulted in significant overestimation of the runoff.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a NOAA Grant (Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDNA06NWS4680012). Help from Austin/San Antonio National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office staff is greatly appreciated. Comments on the original manuscript by Aaron Byrd of the Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) are sincerely appreciated.

References

Andréassian, V., Oddos, A., Michel, C., Anctil, F., Perrin, C., and Loumagne, C. (2004). “Impact of spatial aggregation of inputs and parameters on the efficiency of rainfall-runoff models: A theoretical study using chimera watersheds.” Water Resour. Res., 40, W05209.
Ball, J. E., and Luk, K. C. (1998). “Modeling the spatial variability of rainfall over a catchment.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 3(2), 122–130.
Belmans, C., Wesseling, J. G., and Feddes, R. A. (1983). “Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE.” J. Hydrol., 63, 271–286.
Beven, K. J. (1985). “Chapter 13: Distributed models.” Hydrological forecasting, M. G. Anderson and T. P. Burt, eds., Wiley, New York.
Brazil, L. E. (1988). “Multilevel calibration strategy for complex hydrologic models.” Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Byrd, A., and Billen, R. (2006). GSSHA 2.1d tutorials. United States Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC-CHL, Vicksburg, Miss.
City of Austin. (2007a). “Austin creeks: Flood, erosion and water quality.” ⟨http://environmentaldirectory.info/PDFs/WatershedNet.pdf⟩ (April 2010).
City of Austin. (2007b). “Information on Balcones Canyonlands Preserve.” ⟨http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/water/wildland/bcppartners.htm⟩ (April 2010).
Downer, C. W., Jorgeson, J., Ogden, F. L., Julien, P. Y., Martin, W. D., Edris, E., Harmon, R. S., Meselhe, E., and Nelson, J. (2003). “The case for physically-based distributed hydrologic modeling approaches for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, civil works projects.” Proc., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydraulics and Hydrology Conf., USACE, Portland, Ore.
Downer, C. W., and Ogden, F. L. (2004). “GSSHA: Model to simulate diverse stream flow producing processes.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(3), 161–174
Downer, C. W., and Ogden, F. L. (2006). “Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) user’s manual.” ERDC/CHL SR-06–1, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburge, Miss.
Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory (EMRL). (2006). Watershed Modeling System (WMS) Version 8.0 Tutorial, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah.
Grice, G. K., and Maddox, R. A. (1982). “Synoptic aspects of heavy rain events in South Texas associated with the westerlies.” Tech. Memo NWS SR-106, NOAA, Fort Worth, Tex.
Hydrological Engineering Center (HEC). (2000). Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: Technical reference manual, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, Calif.
Kirkland, M. R. (1991). “Algorithms for solving Richards’ equation in variably saturated soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, N.M.
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). (2004). “NCDC climate monitoring reports, U.S. monthly temperature and precipitation.” ⟨http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2004/cmb-prod-us-2004.html⟩ (April 2010).
National Research Council (NRC). (2005). Flash flood forecasting over complex terrain: With an assessment of the sulphur mountain NEXRAD in Southern California, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Niedzialek, J. A. and Ogden, F. L., and (2003). “Abstract: Physics-based distributed rainfall-runoff modeling of urbanized watersheds revisited with GSSHA.” World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, P. Bizier and P. DeBarry, eds., ASCE, Philadelphia.
Ogden, F. L., Downer, C. W., and Meselhe, E., and (2003). “Abstract: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers gridded surface/subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model: Distributed-parameter, physically based watershed simulations.” World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, P. Bizier and P. DeBarry, eds., ASCE, Philadelphia.
Ogden, F. L., Sharif, H. O., Senarath, S., Smith, J., Baeck, M. L., and Richardson, J. (2000). “Hydrologic analysis of the Fort Collins, Colorado, flash flood of 1997.” J. Hydrol., 228, 82–100.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N. (1983). “Green-Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 109(1), 62–70.
Reed, S., Schaake, J., and Zhang, Z. Y. (2007). “A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations.” J. Hydrol., 337(3–4), 402–420.
Senarath, S., Sharif, H. O., and Ogden, F. L. (1998). “Simulation of the 1996 Rapidan flood.” Presented at the 4th Int. Symp. on Hydrologic Applications of Weather Radar, Hydrologic Research Center, San Diego.
Sharif, H. O., Yates, D., Roberts, R., and Mueller, C. (2006). “The use of an automated nowcasting system to forecast flash floods in an urban watershed.” J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 190–202.
Wolock, D. M., and McCabe, G. J. (1995). “Comparison of single and multiple flow-direction algorithms for computing topographic parameters in TOPMODEL.” Water Resour. Res., 31, 1315–1324.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15Issue 8August 2010
Pages: 651 - 657

History

Received: May 5, 2009
Accepted: Jan 13, 2010
Published online: Jan 22, 2010
Published in print: Aug 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hatim O. Sharif
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 (corresponding author).
Leon Sparks
Chiang, Patel, and Yerby, Inc., Austin, TX.
Almoutaz A. Hassan
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249.
Jon Zeitler
NOAA/NWS, Austin/San Antonio Weather Forecast Office, New Braunfels, TX.
Hongjie Xie
Dept. of Earth and Environmental Science, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share