Improving HSPF Modeling Accuracy from FTABLES: Case Study for the Illinois River Basin
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 8
Abstract
An application of the Hydrologic Simulation Program–FORTRAN (HSPF) model was developed for the entire Illinois River basin. During the simulation period from 1985 to 1995, simulated monthly and annual flows correlated well with observed data. However, its performance for daily flows in the lower portion of the basin was not satisfactory because of the complicated hydraulic condition of the Illinois River. In order to compensate the weakness of HSPF for flow routing, we have coupled a calibrated hydraulic model, one-dimensional unsteady flow through a full network of open channels (UNET), to improve flow routing accuracy and the overall performance of the HSPF model. In this study we intended to test how HSPF modeling accuracy can be improved from modifying function tables (FTABLES). We proposed four alternative sets of FTABLES: three (Sets B, C, and D) were based on Manning’s equation and one (Set E) used the flow-stage relationship. Simulations from these four alternatives were compared to the default FTABLES (Set A) and the coupled HSPF-UNET model. A comparison showed that improving the estimation on hydraulic gradients from flood frequency analysis (Set B) or improving the computation of reach geometry from surveyed cross sections (Set C) could only improve model accuracy. However, much better modeling accuracy can be obtained by improving both reach geometry and hydraulic gradients (Set D). Using the stage-discharge relationships simulated from a hydraulic model (Set E) also provided better results. The proposed methods have been successfully applied to watershed modeling with HSPF in the Illinois River basin. This study demonstrated that better HSPF modeling accuracy can be achieved with minimum effort from representative channel geometries and hydraulic gradients.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Views expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Illinois State Water Survey.
References
Bergman, M. J., Green, W., and Donnangelo, L. J. (2002). “Calibration of storm loads in the South Prong watershed, Florida, using BASINS/HSPF.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(5), 1423–1436.
Bicknell, B., Imhoff, J., Kittle, J., Jr., Jobes, T., and Donigian, A., Jr. (2001). Hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN HSPF, Version 12. User’s manual, AQUA TERRA Consultants, Mountain View, Calif.
Carrubba, L. (2000). “Hydrologic modeling at the watershed scale using NPSM.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 36(6), 1237–1246.
Ishii, A. L., Charlton, T. J., Ortel, T. W., and Vonnahme, C. C. (1998). “Operational modeling with dynamic-wave routing in water resources and the urban environment.” Proc., 25th Annual Conf. on Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Chicago, 147–152.
Lian, Y. Q., Chan, I. C., Singh, J., Demissie, M., Xie, H., and Knapp, V. H. (2007). “Coupling of hydrologic and hydraulic models for the Illinois River basin.” J. Hydrol., 344, 210–222.
Lian, Y. Q., Demissie, M., and Chan, I. C. (2005). “Increasing HSPF model performance by improving FTABLEs: Case studies on the Illinois River basin.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress (CD-ROM), ASCE-EWRI, Anchorage, Alaska.
Lumb, A. M., McCammon, R. B., and Kittle, J. L., Jr. (1994). “Users manual for an expert system (HSPEXP) for calibration of the hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN.” Water Resources Investigations Rep. No. 94-4168, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Reston, Va.
Motovilov, Y. G., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K., and Rohde, A. (1999). “Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 98–99, 257–277.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., Arnold, J. G., and Demissie, M. (2005). “Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(2), 343–360.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., Lian, Y., and Demissie, M. (2003). “The Illinois River basin hydrologic model.” The 2003 Governor’s Conf. on the Management of the Illinois River System, Special Rep. No. 29, IL Water Resource Center, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Ill., 73–84.
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). (1999). A primer to the South Florida water management model (Version 3.5), South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Fla.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2004). “Upper Mississippi River system flow frequency study.” Final Rep., USACE Rock Island District, Ill.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2001). “Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources—BASINS 3.0. Users’ manual.” EPA-823B01001, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2007). BASINS Technical Note 1: Creating hydraulic function tables (FTABLES) for reservoirs in BASINS, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: May 11, 2009
Accepted: Jan 1, 2010
Published online: Jan 14, 2010
Published in print: Aug 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.