Uncertainty Analyses of Watershed Time Parameters
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 5
Abstract
Because of differences in roughness, flow depth, and slope, the timing of runoff from most parts of a watershed differs from that along the principal flow path, which is generally used to compute times of concentration. Thus, times of concentration computed from principal flow path information do not accurately reflect the timing of runoff from most parts of a watershed. Specifically, travel times based on the principal flow path will be shorter than times based on the entire watershed, which could result in inaccurate computed peak discharge rates. This potential bias in watershed runoff timing was investigated using both measured rainfall—runoff data from 27 watersheds and computer simulation. Multiple definitions of the time of concentration were compared, with the expected uncertainty in the alternative definitions evaluated. The difference in timing between the centers of mass of rainfall excess and direct runoff was found to be the least uncertain timing parameter while the traditional definition of time of concentration, i.e., the difference between the end of rainfall excess and the inflection point, was found to be highly uncertain. An adjustment factor that can be applied to times of concentration computed solely from the principal flow path is provided to eliminate the bias inherent to times computed from information obtained from the principal flow path.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Agiraliouglu, N. (1985). “A comparison of water lag times for converging and plane surface.” Nord. Hydrol., 16(3), 169–176.
Agricultural Research Service (ARS). (1973). “Hydrologic data for experimental watersheds in the United States, 1967.” USDA-ARS Misc. Publ. N. 1262, Washington, D.C.
Aron, G., Ball, J. E., and Smith, T. A. (1991). “A fractal concept used in time of concentration estimates.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 117(5), 635–641.
Askew, A. J. (1970). “Variation in lag time of natural catchments.” J. Hydr. Div., 96(2), 317–330.
Ball, J. E. (1994). “The influence of storm temporal patterns on catchment response.” J. Hydrol., 158(3/4), 285–303.
Barnes, B. S. (1959). “Consistency in unitgraphs.” J. Hydr. Div., 85(8), 39–61.
Clark, C. O. (1945). “Storage and the unit hydrograph.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 100, 1416–1446.
Dingman, S. L. (2002). Physical hydrology, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Dooge, J. C. I. (1959). “A general theory of the unit hydrograph.” J. Geophys. Res., 64(2), 241–256.
Dooge, J. C. I. (1973). “Linear theory of hydrologic systems.” Tech. Bull. No. 1468, Agric. Res. Serv., USDA, GPO, Washington, D.C.
Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning, Freeman, San Francisco.
Hager, W. H. (1985). “Effects of excess rainfall time distribution on catchment area hydrograph.” Nord. Hydrol., 16(3), 157–168.
Hood, M. J., Clausen, J. C., and Warner, G. S. (2007). “Comparison of stormwater lag times for low impact and traditional residential development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(4), 1036–1046.
Laurenson, E. M. (1962). “Hydrograph synthesis by runoff routing.” WRL Rep. No. 66, Univ. of New South Wales, New South Wales.
Lewis, A. E., Chase, S. B., and Lee, K. W. (1994). “Correlation of pavement surface texture to hydraulic roughness.” Transportation Research Record. 1471, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 10–17.
Lou, W., and Harlin, J. M. (2003). “A theoretical travel time based on watershed hypsometry.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(4), 785–792.
McCuen, R. H. (2005). Hydrologic analysis and design, 3rd Ed., Pearson/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Nash, J. E. (1957). “The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph.” Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol., Publ. n62, 3, 114–121.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” TR-55, Washington, D.C.
Overton, D. E., and Meadows, M. E. (1976). Stormwater modeling, Academic, New York.
Pilgrim, D. H. (1977). “Isochrones of travel time and distribution of flood storage from a tracer study on a small watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 13(3), 587–595.
Ragan, R. M., and Duru, J. O. (1972). “Kinematic wave nomograph for times of concentration.” J. Hydr. Div., 98(10), 1765–1771.
Reed, J. R., and Kibler, D. F. (1983). “Hydraulic resistance of pavement surfaces.” J. Transp. Eng., 109(2), 286–296.
Reed, J. R., and Strong, J. B. (1993). “Manning’s n from experiments with rainfall-runoff on Portland cement concrete surfaces.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Hydrology, ASCE, San Francisco, 995–1000.
Singh, V. P. (1992). Elementary hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Sweet, W. V., and Geratz, J. W. (2003). “Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships and recurrence intervals for North Carolina’s coastal plain.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(4), 861–871.
U.S. Water Resources Council (USWRC). (1981). Estimating peak flow frequencies for natural ungaged watersheds, Washington, D.C.
Wong, T. S. W. (2005). “Assessment of time of concentration formulas for overland flow.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(4), 383–387.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14 • Issue 5 • May 2009
Pages: 490 - 498
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 29, 2007
Accepted: Jul 28, 2008
Published online: Feb 19, 2009
Published in print: May 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.