TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 11, 2009

Predicting Model Uncertainty at River Junctions due to Drainage Network Structure

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 5

Abstract

The mixing of water, solutes, and sediments from two or more tributaries produces streamflow possessing unique biogeochemical, ecological, hydrological, and morphological signatures. To understand and predict these signatures, confluence locations within river networks are commonly used to divide a watershed into individual modeling units, within these units hydrologic characteristics are spatially averaged and used to parameterize process models. In this context, model parameters from an individual unit directly influence the simulated hydrograph at its corresponding downstream junction and reach. Previous researchers have shown complex changes in flow hydraulics, stream geometry, and channel morphology in the downstream direction of a drainage network. However, the uncertainty of model predictions at and between junction locations due to parameter variability within individual modeling units is poorly understood. This paper presents a methodology for identifying stream junctions and reaches that are potentially vulnerable to increased model uncertainty due to the structural arrangement of their upstream drainage network and model parameter variability. A case study, using coastal southern California, is presented to illustrate the concepts and explore the relationships between changes in simulated peak discharge at junctions and along reaches due to expected model parameter variability for varying drainage network characteristics. Based on simulation results for 300 different drainage network configurations, eight model parameter scenarios, and three design storms (7,200 simulations), the uncertainty in simulated peak discharge within a reach is related to the drainage network characteristics. In the study region, 18% of the reaches are shown to be especially vulnerable to model parameter uncertainty, with 32% of those researches crossed by a major road and/or railroad. This approach is intended to improve risk assessment in sensitive hydrologic applications, such as the design of bridges, culverts, and channels to convey flood flows.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted as part of the Santa Barbara Channel–Long Term Ecological Research Project supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. NSFOCE-9982105.

References

Beighley, R. E., Melack, J. M., and Dunne, T. (2003). “Impacts of California’s climate regimes and coastal land use change on streamflow characteristics.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(6), 1419–1433.
Benda, L., Andras, K., Miller, D., and Bigelow, P. (2004). “Confluence effects in rivers: Interactions of basin scale, network geometry, and disturbance.” Water Resour. Res., 40, W05402.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrolog. Process., 6(3), 279–298.
Biron, P., Boy, A. G., and Best, J. L. (1996). “Turbulent flow structure at concordant and discordant open-channel confluences.” Exp. Fluids, 21(6), 437–446.
Burrough, P. A., and McDonell, R. A. (1998). Principles of geographical information systems, Oxford University Press, New York, 190.
Carragher, M. J., Klein, M., and Petch, J. R. (1983). “Channel width-drainage area relations in small basins.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 8(2), 177–181.
Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning, Freeman, San Francisco.
Feluch, W. (1995). “Nonparametric estimation of multivariate density and nonparametric regression.” New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources, Z. W. Kundzewicz, ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Govers, G., Gimenez, R., and Oost, K. V. (2007). “Rill erosion: Exploring the relationship between experiments, modelling and field observations.” Earth-Sci. Rev., 84(3–4), 87–102.
Hubbert, P., Friggit, F., and Carbonnel, J. P. (1995). “Multifractal structure of rainfall occurrence in West Africa.” New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources, Z. W. Kundzewicz, ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Kennedy, B. A. (1984). “On Playfair’s law of accordant junctions.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 9(2), 153–173.
Kindler, J. and Tyszewski, S. (1995). “On the value of fuzzy concepts in hydrology and water resources management.” Z. W. Kundzewicz, ed., New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Konecny, F. and Nachtnebel, H. P. (1995). “A daily stream flow model based on a jump diffusion process.” New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources, G. Morel-Seytoux, ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 350.
Kundzewicz, Z. W. (1995). New uncertainty concepts in hydrology and water resources, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Leopold, L. B., and Maddock, T. J. (1953). “Hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications.” U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 252, Washington, D.C.
Lindsay, J. B., and Evans, M. G. (2007). “The influence of elevation error on the morphometrics of channel networks extracted from DEMs and the implications for hydrological modeling.” Hydrolog. Process., 22(11), 1588–1603.
Liu, Y., and Gupta, H. V. (2007). “Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W07401.
Mandelbrott, B. B. (1977). Fractal geometry of nature, Freeman, New York.
Modi, P. N., Ariel, P. D., and Dandekar, M. M. (1981). “Conformal mapping for channel junction flow.” J. Hydr. Div., 107(12), 1713–1733.
Monteverdi, J., and Null, J. (1997). “El Niño and California Rainfall.” Western Region Technical Attachment No. 97–37, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Md.
Moss, M. E. (1992). “Bayesian relative information measure: A tool for analysing the outputs of atmospheric general circulation models.” J. Geophys. Res., 97(D4), 3711–3724.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2007). “Precipitation-frequency atlas of the western United States, 1973.” ⟨http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ohd/hdsc/noaaatlas2.htm⟩ (Nov. 2007).
Parsons, D. R., Best, J. L., Lane, S. N., Orfeo, O., Hardy, R. J., and Kostaschuk, R. (2007). “Form roughness and the absence of secondary flow in a large confluence-diffluence, Rio Paraná, Argentina.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 32(1), 155–162.
Rhoads, B. L. (1987). “Changes in stream channel characteristics at tributary junctions.” Phys. Geogr., 8(4), 346–361.
Rhoads, B. L., and Kenworthy, S. T. (1995). “Flow structure at an asymmetrical stream confluence.” Geomorphology, 11(4), 273–293.
Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L., and Knapen, A. (2006). “Channel widthflow discharge relationships for rills and gullies.” Geomorphology, 76(3–4), 273–279.
United States Census Bureau (USCB). (2000). “1990 census, population and housing unit counts, United States (1990 CPH-2–1).” ⟨www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/doc/pl94-171.pdf⟩ (Oct. 1, 2007).
U.S. Department of Agriculture/Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDAI/NRCS). (2004). National engineering handbook (NEH), Part 630, Hydrology: Chapter 9, Hydrologic Soil Cover Complexes, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Agriculture/Soil Conservation Service (USDA/SCS). (1994). “State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base for California.” Fort Worth, Tex.
U.S. Department of the Interior/U.S. Geological Survey (USDOI/USGS). (1998). “Digital elevation model standards.” ⟨http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/nmpstds/demstds.html⟩ (Oct. 1, 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (1999). “National elevation dataset.” EROS Data Center, ⟨http://gisdata. usgs. net/ned/⟩ (Oct. 1, 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2003). “National land cover database 2001.” ⟨http://www.mrlc.gov/index.asp⟩ (Oct. 1, 2007).
Verdin, K. L. and Verdin, J. P. (1999). “A topological system for delineation and codification of the Earth’s river basins.” J. Hydrol., 218(1–2), 1–12.
Yang, L., Huang, C., Homer, C. A., Wylie, B. K., and Coan, M. J. (2003). “An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: Synergistic use of landsat-7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery.” Can. J. Remote Sens., 29(2), 230–240.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14Issue 5May 2009
Pages: 499 - 507

History

Received: Nov 23, 2007
Accepted: Jul 9, 2008
Published online: Feb 11, 2009
Published in print: May 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. Edward Beighley [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, San Diego State Univ., 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA 92182 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Yiping He
Post-Doctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA 92182.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share