Technical Papers
Jul 2, 2021

Effect of Field Drainage on Seismic Pore Pressure Buildup and Kσ under High Overburden Pressure

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 9

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of a high effective overburden pressure [σv0=600 kPa (6 atm)] under two drainage conditions on the field liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of eight centrifuge experiments with relative densities Dr=45% and 80% and base shaking are considered that include a 5-m saturated sand layer under a pressure of either σv0=100 kPa (1 atm) or 600 kPa (6 atm). Four of the tests had single drainage at the top of the layer (SD), whereas the other four tests had double drainage (DD) at top and bottom. The four SD test results had been reported before, whereas the four DD tests are new. A novel centrifuge technique was developed to achieve the double-drainage boundary condition of two pervious boundaries at the top and bottom of the sand layer, using a geocomposite at the bottom. Measured responses are compared at the same σv0 between SD and DD tests having the same input acceleration, as well as between SD and DD tests where the shaking induced a similar maximum excess pore pressure ratio (ru)max0.8. These comparisons include acceleration time histories, excess pore pressure time histories and profiles during and after shaking, and stress ratio and shear strain time histories. Comparisons between corresponding tests at 100 and 600 kPa (1 and 6 atm) revealed significantly more partial drainage at 600 kPa (6 atm) than at 100 kPa (1 atm), with even more significant variation in excess pore pressures in the DD than in the SD tests. Best estimates of field overburden pressure correction factors at 600 kPa (6 atm), Kσ were obtained, were obtained from the centrifuge results with two independent methods for a failure criterion of (ru)max=0.8. Those Kσ=1.21.3>1.0 for both SD and DD drainage conditions due to the significantly lower compressibility of the sand at 600 kPa (6 atm). The results further emphasize the important role partial drainage may play in the field during shaking at high σv0 on the excess pore pressures and values of Kσ.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the RPI geotechnical centrifuge technical staff for their help in the project and the preparation of this paper. Professor Mourad Zeghal helped with the system identification of records, which is most appreciated. The authors also would like to thank Solmax.com for providing all geocomposite and geonet materials used in the research project, which is greatly appreciated. The research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1545026 and NYU Abu Dhabi; this support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abdoun, T., M. A. Gonzalez, S. Thevanayagam, R. Dobry, A. Elgamal, M. Zeghal, and U. El Shamy. 2013. “Centrifuge and large-scale modeling of seismic pore pressures in sands: Cyclic strain interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000821.
Abdoun, T., M. Ni, R. Dobry, A. Marr, K. Zehtab, and W. El-Sekelly. 2020. “Pore pressure and kσ evaluation at high overburden pressure under field drainage conditions. II: Additional interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002302.
Andrus, R. D., and K. H. Stokoe II. 2000. “Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
Benjamin, J. R., and C. A. Cornell. 1970. Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Boulanger, R. W. 2003. “High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1071).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2004. “State normalization of penetration resistance and the effect of overburden stress on liquefaction resistance.” In Proc., 11th SDEE and 3rd ICEGE, Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test-based liquefaction-triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, A. Der Kiureghian, K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder Jr., R. E. Kayen, and R. E. Moss. 2004. “Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1314–1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized 865 modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2015. “Cyclic shear strain needed for liquefaction triggering and assessment of overburden pressure factor Kσ.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (11): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001342.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2017. “Recent findings on liquefaction triggering in clean and silty sands during earthquakes.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (10): 04017077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001778.
Elgamal, A. W., M. Zeghal, V. Taboada, and R. Dobry. 1996. “Analysis of site liquefaction and lateral spreading using centrifuge testing records.” Soils Found. 36 (2): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_111.
Elgamal, A. W., M. Zeghal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. I: evaluation of site dynamic properties.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 121 (4): 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(350).
El-Ghoraiby, M. A., H. Park, and M. T. Manzari. 2017. LEAP 2017: Soil characterization and element tests for Ottawa F65 sand. Washington, DC: George Washington Univ.
Gillette, D. 2013. “Liquefaction issues for dam safety—Bureau of Reclamation.” In Proc., Presentation in One-Day Workshop, Committee on State of the Art and Practice in Earthquake Induced Soil Liquefaction Assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
GSE Environmental. 2015. “Tri-axial geonets and geocomposites for drainage applications.” Accessed 5 April 2020. http://www.gseworld.com/content/documents/datasheets/Tri_Axial/DuraFlow_8.4_mm_Geocomp_METRIC_DS.pdf.
Harder, L. 1988. Use of penetration tests to determine the cyclic loading resistance of gravelly soils during earthquake shaking. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Holtz, R. D., W. D. Kovacs, and T. C. Sheahan. 2011. An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hynes, M. E., R. S. Olsen, and D. E. Yule. 1999. “Influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Physics and mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, 145–152. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2006. “Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2010. SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures.. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Montgomery, J., R. W. Boulanger, and L. F. Harder Jr. 2012. Examination of the Kσ overburden correction factor on liquefaction resistance.. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
National Academies. 2017. State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences: A Report of the National Academies, Committee on State of the art and practice in earthquake-induced soil liquefaction. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ni, M., T. Abdoun, R. Dobry, A. Marr, K. Zehtab, and W. El-Sekelly. 2020. “Pore pressure and Kσ evaluation at high overburden pressure under field drainage conditions. I: Centrifuge experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002303.
Reddi, L. 2003. Seepage in soils: Principles and applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Seed, H. B. 1983. “Earthquake-resistant design of earth dams.” In Proc., Seismic Design of Earth Dams and Caverns. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1981. “Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes.” In Session on in situ testing to evaluate liquefaction susceptibility. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seed, R. B., and L. F. Harder Jr. 1990. “SPT-based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength.” In Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symp. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Vaid, Y. P., and S. Sivathayalan. 1996. “Static and cyclic liquefaction potential of Fraser Delta sand in simple shear and triaxial tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (2): 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-007.
Vaid, Y. P., and J. Thomas. 1995. “Liquefaction and postliquefaction behavior of sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (2): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:2(163).
Youd, T. L., et al. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998  NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10): 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817).
Zeghal, M., A. W. Elgamal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(363).
Zimmaro, P., et al. 2019. “Next-generation liquefaction database.” Next-Gener. Liquefaction Consortium https://doi.org/10.21222/C2J040.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 9September 2021

History

Received: Jul 28, 2020
Accepted: Feb 23, 2021
Published online: Jul 2, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 2, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. Ni, S.M.ASCE
Software Development Engineer, Amazon Development Center, P.O. Box 81226, Seattle, WA 98105.
T. Abdoun, M.ASCE
Iovino Chair Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th St., JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180; Global Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New York Univ. Abu Dhabi, P.O. Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
R. Dobry, M.ASCE
Emeritus Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 23 Mann Blvd., Clifton Park, NY 12065.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Mansoura Univ., Mansoura 35516, Egypt; Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New York Univ. Abu Dhabi, P.O. Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-646X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • On the In Situ Cyclic Resistance of Natural Sand and Silt Deposits, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10784, 149, 4, (2023).
  • Interpretation of the Overburden Pressure Effect on Sand Liquefaction Behavior, Geo-Congress 2023, 10.1061/9780784484654.007, (60-69), (2023).
  • In-Situ Liquefaction Testing of a Medium Dense Sand Deposit and Comparison to Case History- and Laboratory-Based Cyclic Stress and Strain Evaluations, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022), 10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_32, (545-564), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share