Technical Papers
Jun 8, 2021

Influence of Low-Permeability Layers on the Installation and the Response to Vertical Cyclic Loading of Suction Caissons

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 8

Abstract

Offshore wind is a key part of the change toward renewable energy sources. Offshore wind farm developments are moving to sites that are characterized by increased water depths and layered soil profiles, e.g., in the North Sea. Suction caisson–based jacked structures are expected to be increasingly used to support wind turbines at such sites. Experience of suction caissons serving as foundations for offshore wind turbines is limited. The mechanisms governing the suction caisson installation in layered soils are poorly understood and no published data of the in-service performance of suction caisson jackets supporting offshore wind turbines in layered soils exists. This gap is addressed here through a series of centrifuge tests investigating the installation and the response of suction caissons in layered soils—sand over clay and clay over sand—subjected to vertical cyclic loading into tension. The results reveal the mechanisms enabling suction caisson installation in layered soils and the complex load transfer mechanisms governing the suction caisson response under vertical cyclic loading. The clay layer plays a key role: in sand over clay, it encapsulates the sand plug, which leads to predominantly undrained behavior. In clay over sand, the uplift of the clay soil plug is critical both in facilitating suction installation and in response to vertical cyclic loading in tension. These findings provide confidence for suction installation and caisson response under vertical cyclic loading into tension in layered soils.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for our research project GR 1024/26-2 Sauginstallation Maritimer Strukturen (SIMS). This work forms part of the activities of the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS), which is currently supported as a Centre of Excellence by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation. Lloyd’s Register Foundation helps to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement, and the application of research. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Al-Tabbaa, A., and D. M. Wood. 1987. “Some measurements of the permeability of kaolin.” Géotechnique 37 (4): 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.4.499.
Bienen, B., R. T. Klinkvort, C. D. O’Loughlin, F. Zhu, and B. W. Byrne. 2018a. “Suction caissons in dense sand. Part I: Installation, limiting capacity and drainage.” Géotechnique 68 (11): 937–952. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.281.
Bienen, B., R. T. Klinkvort, C. D. O’Loughlin, F. Zhu, and B. W. Byrne. 2018b. “Suction caissons in dense sand. Part II: Vertical cyclic loading into tension.” Géotechnique 68 (11): 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.282.
Broughton, P., R. L. Davies, and J. Jenkins. 2013. “The removal of the Maureen steel gravity platform.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., 1–14. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Chow, S. H., C. D. O’Loughlin, C. Gaudin, and J. T. Lieng. 2018. “Drained monotonic and cyclic capacity of a dynamically installed plate anchor in sand.” Ocean Eng. 148 (Jan): 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.051.
Colreavy, C., C. D. O’Loughlin, and M. F. Randolph. 2016. “Experience with a dual pore pressure element piezoball.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 16 (3): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.15.00011.
Cotter, O. 2010. “Installation of suction caisson foundations for offshore renewable energy structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering Science, Univ. of Oxford.
Dow. 2002. Methocel cellulose ethers: Technical handbook. Midland, MI: The Dow Chemical Company.
Finnie, I. M. S., and M. F. Randolph. 1994. “Punch-through and liquefaction induced failure of shallow foundations on calcareous sediments.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on the Behaviour of Offshore Structures, 217–230. Rotterdamm, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Houlsby, G. T., and B. W. Byrne. 2005a. “Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 158 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.75.
Houlsby, G. T., and B. W. Byrne. 2005b. “Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in sand.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 158 (3): 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2005.158.3.135.
House, A. R. 2002. “Suction caisson foundations for buoyant offshore facilities.” Ph.D. thesis, Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, Univ. of Western Australia.
Jeong, Y. H., H. J. Park, D. S. Kim, and J. H. Kim. 2018. “Cyclic behaviour of unit bucket for tripod foundation system under various loading characteristics via centrifuge.” In Vol. 1 of Physical modelling in geotechnics, 609–614. London: CRC Press.
Ladd, C. C., R. Foot, K. Ishihara, F. Schlosser, and H. G. Poulos. 1977. “Stress-deformation and strength characteristics.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 421–494. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Lehane, B. M., and Q. B. Liu. 2013. “Measurement of shearing characteristics of granular materials at low stress levels in a shear box.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (1): 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9571-9.
Lehane, B. M., C. D. O’Loughlin, C. Gaudin, and M. F. Randolph. 2009. “Rate effects on penetrometer resistance in kaolin.” Géotechnique 59 (1): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.00072.
Low, H. E., T. Lunne, K. H. Andersen, M. A. Sjursen, X. Li, and M. F. Randolph. 2010. “Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays.” Géotechnique 60 (11): 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.017.
Ragni, R., B. Bienen, C. D. O’Loughlin, S. A. Stanier, M. J. Cassidy, and N. Morgan. 2020a. “Observations of the effects of a clay layer on suction bucket installation in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (5): 04020020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002217.
Ragni, R., B. Bienen, S. Stanier, C. O’Loughlin, and M. Cassidy. 2020b. “Observations during suction bucket installation in sand.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 20 (3): 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.18.00071.
Ragni, R., B. Bienen, S. A. Stanier, M. J. Cassidy, and C. D. O’Loughlin. 2018. “Visualisation of mechanisms governing suction bucket installation in dense sand.” In Vol. 1 of Physical modelling in geotechnics, 651. London: CRC Press.
Raines, R. D., O. Ugaz, and J. Garnier. 2005. “Centrifuge modeling of suction piles in clay.” In Frontiers in offshore geotechnics, edited by S. Gourvenec and M. Cassidy, 303–308. London: A.A. Balkema.
Randolph, M. F., and C. Gaudin. 2017. “Genesis of the national geotechnical centrifuge facility—A 30 year perspective.” Aust. Geomech. J. 52 (2): 1–14.
Randolph, M. F., R. J. Jewell, K. J. L. Stone, and T. A. Brown. 1991. “Establishing a new centrifuge facility.” In Proc., Int. Conf. Centrifuge 1991, edited by H.-J. Ko and F. G. McLean, 3–9. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Schofield, A. N., and P. Wroth. 1968. Critical state soil mechanics: European civil engineering series. London: McGraw-Hill.
Senders, M., and M. F. Randolph. 2007. “Theory for the installation of suction caissons in sand overlaid by clay.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics, 429–438. London: SUT Society for Underwater Technology.
Senpere, D., and G. A. Auvergne. 1982. “Suction anchor piles—A proven alternative to driving or drilling.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., 483–493. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/4206-MS.
Stanier, S. A., J. Blaber, W. A. Take, and D. J. White. 2016. “Improved image-based deformation measurement for geotechnical applications.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (5): 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0253.
Stanier, S. A., and D. J. White. 2013. “Improved image-based deformation measurement in the centrifuge environment.” Geotech. Test. J. 36 (6): 915–928. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20130044.
Stapelfeldt, M., B. Bienen, and J. Grabe. 2020. “The influence of the drainage regime on the installation and the response to vertical cyclic loading of suction caissons in dense sand.” Ocean Eng. 215 (Nov): 107105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107105.
Tan, T.-S., and R. F. Scott. 1985. “Centrifuge scaling considerations for fluid-particle systems: Centrifuge scaling considerations for fluid-particle systems.” Géotechnique 35 (4): 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.461.
Taylor, R. N. 2011. Geotechnical centrifuge technology. London: Taylor & Francis.
Teng, Y., S. A. Stanier, and S. M. Gourvenec. 2017. “Synchronised multi-scale image analysis of soil deformations.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 17 (1): 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.15.00058.
Tjelta, T. 2015. “The suction foundation technology.” In Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III, edited by V. Meyer, 85–93. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press.
Tjelta, T. I., T. R. Guttormsen, and J. Hermstad. 1986. “Large-scale penetration test at a deepwater site.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., 201–212. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/5103-MS.
Tran, M. N. 2005. “Installation of suction caissons in dense sand and the influence of silt and cemented layers.” Ph.D. thesis, Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, Univ. of Sydney.
Tran, M. N., and M. F. Randolph. 2008. “Variation of suction pressure during caisson installation in sand.” Géotechnique 58 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.1.1.
Tran, M. N., M. F. Randolph, and D. W. Airey. 2004. “Experimental study of suction installation of caissons in dense sand.” In Proc., 23rd Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering—2004, 105–112. New York: ASME.
Tran, M. N., M. F. Randolph, and D. W. Airey. 2007. “Installation of suction caissons in sand with silt layers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (10): 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:10(1183).
Watson, P. G., C. Gaudin, M. Senders, and M. F. Randolph. 2006. “Installation of suction caissons in layered soil.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (ICPMG) // Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Two Volume Set, edited by C. W. W. Ng, Y. H. Wang, and L. M. Zhang, 685–692. Hoboken, NJ: CRC Press.
Zhu, F., B. Bienen, C. O’Loughlin, N. Morgan, and M. J. Cassidy. 2018a. “The response of suction caissons to multidirectional lateral cyclic loading in sand over clay.” Ocean Eng. 170 (Dec): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.09.005.
Zhu, F., C. D. O’Loughlin, and B. Bienen. 2017. “Physical modelling of suction bucket installation and response under long-term cyclic loading.” In Offshore site investigation and geotechnics, 524–531. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Zhu, F., C. D. O’Loughlin, B. Bienen, M. J. Cassidy, and N. Morgan. 2018b. “The response of suction caissons to long-term lateral cyclic loading in single-layer and layered seabeds.” Géotechnique 68 (8): 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.129.
Zografou, D., S. Gourvenec, and C. D. O’Loughlin. 2019. “Vertical cyclic loading response of shallow skirted foundation in soft normally consolidated clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (4): 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0179.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 8August 2021

History

Received: Nov 25, 2019
Accepted: Jan 22, 2021
Published online: Jun 8, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 8, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. Stapelfeldt, Ph.D. [email protected]
Institute of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Management, Hamburg Univ. of Technology, Harburg, Hamburg 21079, Germany (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
B. Bienen, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-0698
Associate Professor, Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, Univ. of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-0698
J. Grabe, Dr.Eng.
Professor, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Management, Hamburg Univ. of Technology, Harburg, Hamburg 21079, Germany.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Influence of Seabed Characteristics on Cyclic Pull-Out Behavior of Suction Anchor for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine under Environmental Loads, Geo-Congress 2023, 10.1061/9780784484692.010, (96-105), (2023).
  • Effective stress analysis of residual wave-induced liquefaction around caisson-foundations: Bearing capacity degradation and an AI-based framework for predicting settlement, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105364, 159, (105364), (2023).
  • Application of ERT and SSR for geotechnical site characterization: A case study for resort assessment in New El Alamein City, Egypt, NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, 10.1080/20909977.2021.2023999, 11, 1, (58-68), (2022).
  • Sidewall Shell Contribution to the Lateral Capacity of Offshore Suction Caissons in Clay, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002898, 148, 11, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share