Technical Papers
May 6, 2021

Common-Origin Approach to Assess Level-Ground Liquefaction Susceptibility and Triggering in CPT-Compatible Soils Using ΔQ

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 7

Abstract

Current engineering practice employs clean sand–based procedures to evaluate liquefaction triggering in nonplastic, coarse-grained soils and low-plasticity, fine-grained soils below level or mildly-sloping ground. Furthermore, existing empirical liquefaction triggering procedures treat all clean sands (fines content <5%) as identical (i.e., employing a single liquefaction resistance boundary). To improve these practices, this paper presents a new ΔQ common-origin method to assess level-ground liquefaction susceptibility and triggering for cone penetration test (CPT)–compatible soils ranging from nonsensitive clays to clean sands using the soil classification index ΔQ (described elsewhere). This procedure was developed using 401 documented case records of liquefaction and nonliquefaction in clean sands, silty sands, sandy silts, and low-plasticity fine-grained soils combined into a single data set. Importantly, the proposed procedure implicitly couples the evaluation of liquefaction susceptibility and triggering and does not require estimating fines content or converting measured CPT tip resistance to an equivalent clean-sand value. Rather, the proposed procedure yields unique estimates of liquefaction resistance for soils based on compressibility (as reflected in ΔQ) such that factors that affect penetration resistance (e.g., mineralogy, grain shape, density, overconsolidation) are incorporated. The new deterministic and probabilistic procedures are illustrated using examples of liquefaction and no liquefaction in clean sands, silty sands to sandy silts, and low-plasticity fine-grained soils.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by Prof. Johann Facciorusso. Direct request for these materials may be made to Prof. Facciorusso as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals for their contributions to this work: Prof. Bret Lingwall for discussions related to universal liquefaction resistance concepts; Prof. Johann Facciorusso for sharing digital CPT data collected following the 2015 Emilia, Italy, earthquake; and Mr. Ryan Leigh for his initial compilation and review of CPT data. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which helped the authors improve the manuscript.

References

Ajmera, B., T. Brandon, and B. Tiwari. 2019. “Characterization of the reduction in undrained shear strength in fine-grained soils due to cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (5): 10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002041.
Arndt, A. M. 2017. “Performance-based liquefaction triggering analyses with two liquefaction models using cone penetration test.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ.
Bennett, M. J., and J. C. Tinsley III. 1995. Geotechnical data from surface and subsurface samples outside of and within liquefaction-related ground failures caused by the October 17, 1989, Loma Prieta earthquake, Santa Cruz and Monterey counties, California. Washington, DC: USGS, US Dept. of the Interior.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2004. Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays.. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2006. “Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (11): 1413–1426. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1090-02412006132:111413.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test-based liquefaction-triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Boulanger, R. W., L. H. Mejia, and I. M. Idriss. 1997. “Liquefaction at moss landing during Loma Prieta earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (5): 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(453).
Box, G. E. P., and G. C. Tiao. 1973. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Bray, J. D., and R. B. Sancio. 2006. “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1165).
Cetin, K. O., A. Der Kiureghian, and R. B. Seed. 2002. “Probabilistic models for the triggering of seismic soil liquefaction.” Struct. Saf. 24 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00036-X.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, A. Der Kiureghian, K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder Jr., R. E. Kayen, and R. E. S. Moss. 2004. “SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1314–1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
Charlie, W. A., D. O. Doehring, J. P. Brislawn, and H. Hassen. 1998. “Direct measurement of liquefaction potential in soils of Monterey County, California.” In The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989—Liquefaction, edited by T. L. Holzer, 181–221. Washington, DC: USGS.
Der Kiureghian, A. 1999. “A Bayesian framework for fragility assessment.” In Proc., ICASP8 Conf., Int. Civil Engineering Risk and Reliability Association, 1003–1010. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Green, R. A., M. Cubrinovski, B. Cox, C. Wood, L. Wotherspoon, B. Bradley, and B. Maurer. 2014. “Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1193/030713EQS066M.
Green, R. A., S. F. Obermeier, and S. M. Olson. 2005. “Engineering geologic and geotechnical analysis of paleoseismic shaking using liquefaction effects: Field examples.” Eng. Geol. 76 (3–4): 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.07.026.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. “Soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” In Monograph MNO-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. 1985. “Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 321–376. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Kayen, R., R. E. S. Moss, E. M. Thompson, R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, A. Der Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tokimatsu. 2013. “Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 119 (3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743.
Liao, S. S. C., and K. Y. Lum. 1998. “Statistical analysis and application of the magnitude scaling factor in liquefaction analysis.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, 410–421. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Liao, S. S. C., D. Veneziano, and R. V. Whitman. 1988. “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.” J. Geotech. Eng. 114 (4): 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:4(389).
Manski, C. F., and S. R. Lerman. 1977. “The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples.” Econometrica 45 (8): 1977–1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914121.
Mejia, L. H. 1998. “Liquefaction at Moss Landing.” In The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Liquefaction, edited by T. L. Holzer, 129–150. Washington, DC: USGS.
Moss, R. E. S., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, A. Der Kiureghian, and K. O. Cetin. 2006. “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Olson, S. M., R. A. Green, and S. F. Obermeier. 2005. “Geotechnical analysis of paleoseismic shaking using liquefaction features: A major updating.” Eng. Geol. 76 (3–4): 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.07.008.
Robertson, P. K. 1990. “Soil classification by the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 27 (1): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-014.
Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-065.
Robertson, P. K., and K. L. Cabal. 2015. Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering. 6th ed., 133. Signal Hill, CA: Gregg Drilling and Testing.
Robertson, P. K., and R. G. Campanella. 1983. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—Part I (sand).” Can. Geotech. J. 20 (4): 718–733. https://doi.org/10.1139/t83-078.
Robertson, P. K., and R. G. Campanella. 1985. “Liquefaction potential of sand using the CPT.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (3): 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(384).
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Saye, S. R., J. Santos, S. M. Olson, and R. D. Leigh. 2017. “Linear trendlines to assess soil classification from cone penetration tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001729.
Seed, H. B., and P. de Alba. 1986. “Use of SPT and CPT tests for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of sands.” In Use of in situ tests in geotechnical engineering, 281–302. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluation soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1982. “Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” In Monograph series, 134. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Seed, H. B., K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, and R. M. Chung. 1985. “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (12): 1425–1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
Seed, R. B., et al. 2003. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A unified and consistent framework.. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Stark, T. D., and S. M. Olson. 1995. “Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (12): 856–869. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:12(856).
Whitman, R. V. 1971. “Resistance of soil to liquefaction and settlement.” Soils Found. 11 (4): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1960.11.4_59.
Youd, T. L., et al. 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998  NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10): 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817).
Youd, T. L., and S. K. Noble. 1997. “Liquefaction criteria based on statistical and probabilistic analyses.” In Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, 201–205. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Apr 17, 2020
Accepted: Jan 13, 2021
Published online: May 6, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 6, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Steven R. Saye, M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Geotechnical Engineer, Kiewit Engineering Group, Inc., 1550 Mike Fahey St., Omaha, NE 68102. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2230d Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, Urbana, IL 61801 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-0719. Email: [email protected]
Kevin W. Franke, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 430J Engineering Bldg., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Static and Cyclic Liquefaction of Copper Mine Tailings, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10661, 149, 5, (2023).
  • The Over-Prediction of Seismically Induced Soil Liquefaction during the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan Earthquake Sequence, Geosciences, 10.3390/geosciences13010007, 13, 1, (7), (2022).
  • Cone penetration tests in saturated and unsaturated silty tailings, Géotechnique, 10.1680/jgeot.21.00261, (1-15), (2022).
  • Comparative Study of CPTU and SDMT in Liquefaction-Prone Silty Sands with Ground Improvement, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002801, 148, 6, (2022).
  • Evaluating model uncertainty of an in situ state parameter-based simplified method for reliability analysis of liquefaction potential, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104957, 151, (104957), (2022).
  • Assessing static liquefaction triggering considering fabric anisotropy effects under the ACST framework, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104796, 148, (104796), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share