Technical Papers
Jul 24, 2019

Modified NTH Method for Assessing Effective Friction Angle of Normally Consolidated and Overconsolidated Clays from Piezocone Tests

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 10

Abstract

An effective stress limit plasticity solution developed at the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) provides a theoretical evaluation of the effective stress friction angle (ϕ) for soft to firm normally consolidated (NC) to lightly overconsolidated clays (LOC) from piezocone penetrometer tests (CPTu). A modified NTH method using the equivalent stress concept is detailed to allow the evaluation of effective stress friction angle for overconsolidated (OC) clays. The solution requires a knowledge of the soil stress history, specifically, the overconsolidation ratio (OCR). A wide variety of clays have now been calibrated using this approach, including measured CPTu and triaxial data collected from six categories: (1) laboratory chamber tests in NC clays; (2) centrifuge testing in NC clays; (3) centrifuge tests in OC clays; (4) field CPTu in natural NC-LOC clays; (5) field CPTu in OC intact clays with OCR>2.5; and (6) field CPTu in OC fissured clays. Results from compiled databases are statistically shown to validate the CPTu-interpreted ϕ values in comparison with laboratory benchmark values obtained from CAUC and CIUC triaxial tests made on high quality samples. Case studies of CPTu soundings conducted in the aforementioned categories are presented to elaborate the application of the NTH solution.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate the support of ConeTec Group of Richmond, BC. The authors also want to acknowledge the help and advice of the late Dr. Rolf Sandven of Trondheim who unexpectedly passed away in October 2016.

References

ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for performing electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM D5778. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bruzzi, D., and M. Battaglio. 1987. Pore pressure measurements during cone penetration tests. I quaderni dell’ISMES. Milan, Italy: Experimental Institute for Models and Structures.
Campanella, R. G., and P. K. Robertson. 1988. “Current status of the piezocone test.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Penetration Testing, 93–116. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Chen, B. S.-Y., and P. W. Mayne. 1994. Profiling the overconsolidation ratio of clays by piezocone tests. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Cinicioglu, O. 2005. “In-situ shear strength by centrifuge modelling.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder.
Cinicioglu, O., D. Znidarcic, and H. Y. Ko. 2006. “A new centrifugal testing method: Descending gravity test.” Geotech. Test. J. 29 (5): 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100213.
DeJong, J. T., R. A. Jaeger, R. W. Boulanger, M. F. Randolph, and D. A. J. Wahl. 2012. “Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization 4.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., ISC-4, 25–42. London: Taylor & Francis.
Demers, D. 2001. “Contribution au developement de l’usage du piezocone dans les sols argileux.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Universite Laval.
Diaz-Rodriguez, J. A., S. Leroueil, and J. D. Aleman. 1992. “Yielding of Mexico City clay and other natural clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. 118 (7): 981–995. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:7(981).
Esquivel, E. R. 1995. “Piezocone testing: Centrifuge modeling and interpretation.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder.
Gasparre, A., S. Nishimura, M. R. Coop, and R. J. Jardine. 2007. “The influence of structure on the behaviour of London Clay.” Géotechnique 57 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.1.19.
Hardison, M. A., and M. Landon. 2015. Correlation of engineering parameters of the Presumpscot formation to the seismic cone penetration test (SCPTu). Augusta, ME: Maine DOT.
Hight, D. W., and R. J. Jardine. 1993. “Small-strain stiffness and strength characteristics of hard London tertiary clays.” In Geotechnical engineering of hard soils & soft rocks, 533–552. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Hight, D. W., F. McMillan, J. J. M. Powell, R. J. Jardine, and C. P. Allenou. 2003. Vol. 2 of Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils, 851–907. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hird, C. C., and S. M. Springman. 2006. “Comparative performance of 5  cm2 and 10  cm2 piezocones in a lacustrine clay.” Geotechnique 56 (6): 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.6.427.
Holtz, R. D., W. D. Kovacs, and T. C. Sheahan. 2010. An introduction to geotechnical engineering. 2nd ed. Pearson, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hunt, C. E. 2000. “Effect of pile installation on static and dynamic soil properties.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Hunt, C. E., J. M. Pestana, J. D. Bray, and M. Riemer. 2002. “Effect of pile driving on static and dynamic properties of soft clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(13).
Hvorslev, H. J. 1960. “Physical components of the shear strength of cohesive soils.” In Proc., Conf. on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, 169–273. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Jamiolkowski, M., C. C. Ladd, J. T. Germaine, and R. Lancellotta. 1985. “New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 57–154. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Janbu, N., and K. Senneset. 1974. “Effective stress interpretation of in-situ static penetration tests.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 1st European Symp. on Penetration Testing, 181–93. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Geotechnical Society.
Kulhawy, F. H., and P. W. Mayne. 1990. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
Ladd, C. C. 1991. “Stability evaluation during staged construction.” J. Geotec. Eng. 117 (4): 540–615. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:4(540).
Ladd, C. C., and D. J. DeGroot. 2003. “Recommended practice for soft ground site characterization: Arthur Casagrande Lecture.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 12th Panamerican Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 3–57. Essen, Germany: Verlag Glückauf.
Ladd, C. C., and R. Foott. 1974. “New design procedure for stability of soft clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 100 (7): 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(74)90494-X.
Lade, P. V. 2016. Triaxial testing of soils. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Lambe, T. W., and R. V. Whitman. 1979. Soil mechanics, SI version. New York: Wiley.
Leroueil, S., and D. W. Hight. 2003. “Behaviour and properties of natural soils and soft rocks.” In Vol. 1 of Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils, 29–254. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Lunne, T., T. Eidsmoen, J. Powell, and R. Quarterman. 1986. “Piezocone testing in overconsolidated clays.” In Proc., 39th Canadian Geotechnical Conf.: In-Situ Testing and Field Behavior, 209–218. Ottawa: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Blackie Academic.
Mayne, P. W. 1980. “Cam clay predictions of undrained strength.” J. Geotech. Eng. 106 (GT11): 1219–1242.
Mayne, P. W. 1988. “Determining OCR in clays from laboratory strength.” J. Geotech. Eng. 114 (GT 1): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:1(76).
Mayne, P. W. 2007. Synthesis 368 on cone penetration test. Washington, DC: NCHRP.
Mayne, P. W. 2012. “Invited keynote: Quandary in geomaterial characterization: New vs. old.” In Shaking the foundations of geoEngineering education, 15–26. London: Taylor & Francis.
Mayne, P. W. 2013. “Updating our geotechnical curricula via a balanced approach of in-situ, laboratory, and geophysical testing of soil.” In Proc., 61st Annual Geotechnical Conf., 65–86. St. Paul, MN: Univ. of Minnesota.
Mayne, P. W. 2016. “Evaluating effective stress parameters and undrained shear strengths of soft-firm clays from CPT and DMT.” Aust. Geomech. J. 51 (4): 27–55.
Mayne, P. W., M. R. Coop, S. Springman, A-B. Huang, and J. Zornberg. 2009. “State-of-the-Art Paper (SOA-1): Geomaterial behavior and testing.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 17th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2777–2872. Rotterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Mayne, P. W., F. H. Kulhawy, and J. N. Kay. 1990. “Observations on the development of pore-water stresses during piezocone penetration in clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 27 (4): 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-05810.1139/t90-058.
Mayne, P. W., and R. A. Pearce. 2005. “Site characterization of bootlegger cove formation clay for port of anchorage.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 951–955. London: Taylor & Francis.
Mayne, P. W., and J. Peuchen. 2018. “Evaluation of CPTU Nkt cone factor for undrained strength of clays.” In Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing 2018 (CPT’18), 423–430. London: CRC Press.
Mayne, P. W., and H. E. Stewart. 1988. “Pore pressure response of K0-consolidated clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. 114 (11): 1340–1346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:11(1340).
Mesri, G., and M. E. M. Abdel-Ghaffar. 1993. “Cohesion intercept in effective stress-stability analysis.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (8): 1229–1249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:8(1229).
Mitchell, J. K., and K. Soga. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
O’Neill, M. W., and G. Yoon. 1995. “Engineering properties of overconsolidated Pleistocene soils of Texas Gulf Coast.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1479: 81–88.
Ouyang, Z., and P. W. Mayne. 2018a. “Effective friction angle of clays and silts from cone piezocone penetration tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (9): 1230–1247. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0451.
Ouyang, Z., and P. W. Mayne. 2018b. “Calibration of NTH method for friction angle using centrifuge CPTUs in clays.” In Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT’18, Delft). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Ouyang, Z., P. W. Mayne, and J. Sharp. 2016. “Review of clay chamber tests using miniature cone and piezocone penetrometers.” In Proc., 69th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. GeoVancouver 2016. Ottawa: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Perić, D., D. Znidarcic, S. Sture, and R. L. Schiffman. 1988. Experimental and numerical modeling of a strip footing on clay. Boulder, CO: Univ. of Colorado.
Pestana, J. M., C. E. Hunt, and J. D. Bray. 2002. “Soil deformation and excess pore pressure field around a closed-ended pile.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(1).
Powell, J. J. M., and T. Lunne. 2005. “A comparison of different sized piezocones in UK clays.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 729–734. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Powell, J. J. M., and R. S. T. Quarterman. 1988. “The interpretation of cone penetration tests in clays with particular reference to rate effects.” In Vol. 2 of Penetration Test 2018: Proc., ISOPT-1, 903–910. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Ramalho-Ortigao, A. J., and L. M. Costa-Filho. 1982. “Discussion: Cam clay predictions of undrained strength.” J. Geotech. Eng. 108 (GT1): 181–183.
Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-06510.1139/T09-065.
Robertson, P. K. 2016. “Cone penetration test-based soil behaviour type classification system—An update.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (12): 1910–1927. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0044.
Sandven, R. 1990. “Strength and deformation properties obtained from piezocone tests.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology.
Sandven, R., A. Gylland, A. Montafia, K. Kåsin, A. A. Pfaffhuber, and M. Long. 2015. Detection of brittle materials. Summary report with recommendations. Trondheim, Norway: Multiconsult.
Sandven, R., A. Gylland, A. Montafia, K. Kåsin, A. A. Pfaffhuber, and M. Long. 2016. “In situ detection of sensitive clays, Part II: Results.” In Proc., 17th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting: Challenges in Nordic Geotechnic, 113–123. Reykjavik, Iceland: Icelandic Geotechnical Society.
Sandven, R., and A. Watn. 1995. “Theme lecture: Interpretation of test results. Soil classification and parameter evaluation from piezocone tests. Results from Oslo airport.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, 35–55. Linkoping, Sweden: Swedish Geotechnical Institute.
Schnaid, F. 2009. In-situ testing in geomechanics: The main tests. London: Taylor & Francis.
Schneider, J. A., and J. N. Hotstream. 2011. Cone penetrometer comparison testing. Madison, WI: Wisconsin DOT.
Schneider, J. A., J. N. Hotstream, P. W. Mayne, and M. F. Randolph. 2012. “Comparing CPTU Q-F and QΔu2v0′ soil classification charts.” Géotech. Lett. 2 (4): 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.12.00044.
Schneider, J. A., M. F. Randolph, P. W. Mayne, and N. R. Ramsey. 2008. “Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalized piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (11): 1569–1586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:11(1569).
Schofield, A., and P. Wroth. 1968. Critical state soil mechanics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Sellountou, E. A., C. Vipulanandan, and M. W. O’Neill. 2004. “Estimation of drained shear strength parameters of Beaumont overconsolidated clay from piezocone data.” In Proc., Center for Innovative Grouting Materials and Technology (CIGMAT). Houston: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. Houston.
Senneset, K., and N. Janbu. 1985. “Shear strength parameters obtained from static cone penetration tests.” In Strength testing of marine sediments, 41–54. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Senneset, K., R. Sandven, and N. Janbu. 1989. “Evaluation of soil parameters from piezocone tests.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1235: 24–37.
Shibuya, S., S. B. Tamrakar, and W. Manakul. 2003. “Geotechnical hazards in Bangkok—Present and future.” Lowland Technol. Int. 5 (1): 1–13.
Skempton, A. W. 1961. “Horizontal stresses in an overconsolidated Eocene clay.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ICSMGE), 351–357. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Smith, M. G. 1993. “A laboratory study of the Marchetti dilatometer.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Engineering Science, Univ. of Oxford.
Stuedlein, A. W., S. L. Kramer, P. Arduino, and R. D. Holtz. 2012. “Geotechnical characterization and random field modeling of desiccated clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (11): 1301–1313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000723.
Van Helden, M. J. 2013. “Measurement and modeling of anisotropic spatial variability of soils for probabilistic stability analysis of earth slopes.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Canada.
Whittle, A. J., D. J. DeGroot, C. C. Ladd, and T-H. Seah. 1994. “Model prediction of anisotropic behavior of Boston Blue Clay.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (1): 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(199).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145Issue 10October 2019

History

Received: Jun 1, 2018
Accepted: Mar 26, 2019
Published online: Jul 24, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 24, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Geosystems Group, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332-0355 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-9979. Email: [email protected]
Paul W. Mayne, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Geosystems Group, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332-0355. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share