Sand Behavior under Stress States Involving Principal Stress Rotation
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 6
Abstract
The behavior of sands exhibiting both unstable and stable response, in their loose deposited state, under axial-torsional shearing involving continuous principal stress rotation is investigated using the hollow cylinder apparatus. This paper examines the parameters affecting the major principal stress direction attained at instability and/or phase transformation during torsional shearing following anisotropic consolidation. It is shown that constant stress ratio () lines, including the instability and phase transformation lines, are associated with the same major principal stress rotation with respect to the vertical within a wide range of initial mean effective stresses along the same consolidation stress ratio, . In sands exhibiting instability, smaller principal stress rotations are required for the mobilization of the effective stress ratio at the onset of instability as the initial shear stress level increases ( decreases). In sands exhibiting stable response, principal stress rotation at phase transformation increases with increasing dilatancy tendencies. The dependence of the angle of shearing resistance, , mobilized at instability (IL), phase transformation (PTL), and failure (FL) lines on principal stress rotation and the intermediate stress parameter, , is examined to verify whether the mobilized angle of shearing resistance can be considered as a material property. In continuous rotation tests, contrary to fixed principal stress direction and tests, the angle of shearing resistance at IL can be considered as material property. However, the angle of shearing resistance at PTL depends on and the direction of the principal stress. Moreover, phase transformation takes place at lower stress ratios as density increases.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research has been cofinanced by the European Union (European Social Fund, ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.
References
Altuhafi, F., Coop, M., and Georgiannou, V. N. (2016). “Effect of particle shape on the mechanical behavior of natural sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04016071.
Arthur, J. R. F., Chua, K. S., Dunstan, T., and Rodriguez del, C. J. I. (1980). “Principal stress rotation: A missing parameter.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 106(GT4), 419–433.
Arthur, J. R. F., and Menzies, B. K. (1972). “Inherent anisotropy in sand.” Geotechnique, 22(1), 115–131.
Bishop, A. W. (1971). “Shear strength parameters for undisturbed and remoulded soil specimens.” Proc., Roscoe Memorial Symp., R. H. G. Parry, ed., Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, U.K., 3–58.
Cai, Y. Y., Yu, H. S., and Wanatowski, D. (2013). “Non coaxial behavior of sand under various stress paths.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1381–1395.
Castro, G. (1969). “Liquefaction of sands.” Ph.D. thesis, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA.
Castro, G. (1994). “Seismically induced triggering of liquefaction failures.” Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Special Volume on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, New Delhi, India.
Castro, G., Poulos, S. G., France, J. W., and Enos, J. L. (1982). “Liquefaction induced by cyclic loading.”, Geotechnical Engineers, Winchester, MA.
Chillarige, A. V., Robertson, P. K., Morgenstern, N. R., and Christian, H. A. (1997). “Evaluation of the in situ state of Fraser river sand.” Can. Geotech. J., 34(4), 510–519.
Georgiannou, V. N., and Konstadinou, M. (2014a). “Effects of density on cyclic behavior of anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand under undrained torsional loading.” Géotechnique, 64(4), 287–302.
Georgiannou, V. N., and Konstadinou, M. (2014b). “Torsional shear behavior of anisotropically consolidated sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04013017.
Georgiannou, V. N., and Tsomokos, A. (2008). “Comparison of two fine sands under torsional loading.” Can. Geotech. J., 45(12), 1659–1672.
Georgiannou, V. N., Tsomokos, A., and Stavrou, K. (2008). “Monotonic and cyclic behavior of sand under torsional loading.” Géotechnique, 58(2), 113–124.
Gutierrez, M., Ishihara, K., and Towhata, I. (1991). “Flow theory for sand during rotation of principal stress direction.” Soils Found., 31(4), 121–132.
Hight, D. W., Gens, A., and Symes, M. J. (1983). “The development of a new hollow cylinder apparatus for investigating the effects of principal stress rotation in soils.” Géotechnique, 33(4), 355–383.
Hosono, Y., and Yoshimine, M. (2008). “Effects of anisotropic consolidation and initial shear load on liquefaction resistance of sand in simple shear condition.” Geotechnical engineering for disaster mitigation and rehabilitation, H. Liu, A. Deng, and J. Chu, eds., Vol. 4, Springer, Berlin, 352–358.
Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F., and Yasuda, S. (1975). “Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses.” Soils Found., 15(1), 29–44.
Ishihara, K., Yamazaki, A., and Haga, K. (1985). “Liquefaction of -consolidated sand under cyclic rotation of principal stress direction with lateral constraint.” Soils Found., 25(4), 63–74.
Kandasami, R. K., and Murthy, T. G. (2015). “Experimental studies on the influence of intermediate principal stress and inclination on the mechanical behaviour of angular sands.” Granular Matter, 17(2), 217–230.
Kandasami, R. K., and Murthy, T. G. (2017). “Manifestation of particle morphology on the mechanical behaviour of granular ensembles.” Granular Matter, 19(2), 1–13.
Kramer, S. L., and Seed, H. B. (1988). “Initiation of soil liquefaction under static loading conditions.” J. Geotech. Eng., 412–430.
Lade, P. V. (1993). “Initiation of static instability in the submarine Nerlerk berm.” Can. Geotech. J., 30(6), 895–904.
Lade, P. V., Rodriguez, N. M., and Van Dyck, E. J. (2014). “Effects of principal stress directions on 3D failure conditions in cross-anisotropic sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04013001.
Miura, K., Miura, S., and Toki, S. (1986). “Deformation of anisotropic dense sand under principal stress axes rotation.” Soils Found., 26(1), 36–52.
Miura, S., and Toki, S. (1984). “Anisotropy in mechanical properties and its simulation of sands sampled from natural deposits.” Soils Found., 24(3), 69–84.
Nakata, Y., Hyodo, M., and Murata, H. (1998). “Flow deformation of sands subjected to principal stress rotation.” Soils Found., 38(2), 115–128.
Oda, M., and Iwashita, K. (1999). “Mechanics of granular materials: An introduction.” A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Olson, S. M., and Stark, T. D. (2003). “Yield strength ratio and liquefaction analysis of slopes and embankments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 727–737.
Shibuya, S., Hight, D. W., and Jardine, R. J. (2003). “Local boundary surfaces of a loose sand dependent on consolidation path.” Soils Found., 43(3), 85–93.
Sivathayalan, S., and Vaid, Y. P. (2002). “Influence of generalized initial state and principal stress rotation on the undrained response of sands.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(1), 63–76.
Symes, M. J. P. R., Shibuya, S., Hight, D. W., and Gens, A. (1985). “Liquefaction with cyclic principal stress rotation.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 4, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1919–1922.
Towhata, I., and Ishihara, K. (1985). “Undrained strength of sand undergoing cyclic rotation of principal stress axes.” Soils Found., 25(2), 135–147.
Tsomokos, A., and Georgiannou, V. N. (2010). “Effect of grain shape and angularity on the undrained response of fine sands.” Can. Geotech. J., 47(5), 539–551.
Uthayakumar, M., and Vaid, Y. P. (1998). “Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(2), 273–283.
Vaid, Y. P., Chung, E. K. F., and Kuerbis, R. H. (1990). “Stress path and steady state.” Can. Geotech. J., 27(1), 1–7.
Vaid, Y. P., and Negussey, D. (1984). “Relative density of pluviated sand samples.” Soils Found., 24(2), 101–105.
Vasquez-Herrera, A. (1988). “The behaviour of undrained contractive sand and its effect on seismic liquefaction flow failures on earth structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Wijewickreme, D., and Vaid, Y. P. (2008). “Experimental observations on the response of loose sand under simultaneous increase in stress ratio and rotation of principal stresses.” Can. Geotech. J., 45(5), 597–610.
Yang, Y., Fei, W., Yu, H. S., Ooi, J., and Rotter, M. (2015). “Experimental study of anisotropy and non-coaxiality of granular solids.” Granular Matter, 17(2), 189–196.
Yang, Z. X., Li, X. S., and Yang, J. (2007). “Undrained anisotropy and rotational shear in granular soil.” Géotechnique, 57(4), 371–384.
Yoshimine, M., Ishihara, K., and Vargas, W. (1998). “Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behaviour of sand.” Soils Found., 38(3), 179–188.
Zdravkovic, L., and Jardine, R. J. (2001). “The effect on anisotropy of rotating the principal stress axes during consolidation.” Géotechnique, 51(1), 69–83.
Zdravkovic, L., Potts, D. M., and Hight, D. W. (2002). “The effect of strength anisotropy on the behaviour of embankments on soft ground.” Géotechnique, 52(6), 447–457.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 27, 2017
Accepted: Nov 9, 2017
Published online: Mar 27, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 27, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.