Technical Papers
Jul 5, 2017

Strains and Pore Pressures Generated during Cyclic Loading of Embankments on Organic Soil

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 9

Abstract

The seismic response of a stiff levee structure placed on soft peat foundation soil is studied using centrifuge testing. The model levee was 5.1 m tall in prototype dimensions and rested atop 6.1 m of peat. The model was shaken with a suite of earthquake ground motions scaled to various intensities. Vertical and horizontal displacement records obtained from accelerometer arrays embedded in the peat were interpreted using bilinear quadrilateral interpolation to obtain in-plane components of the Cauchy strain tensor at each time increment. A direct-simple-shear-equivalent shear strain invariant, γDSS,eq, was computed from the tensors. Values of γDSS,eq as high as 7% were observed for input accelerations of 0.52g. Residual excess pore pressures were mobilized at shear strain amplitudes higher than 1%, reaching maximum residual pore pressure ratios near 0.2. The observed relationship between the residual excess pore pressure ratio and mobilized shear strain agrees reasonably well with results from a laboratory simple shear testing program. Vertical strains in the levee toe region were 2.5 times larger than beneath the crest attributable to levee rocking under seismic loading. These vertical strains contribute to γDSS,eq and therefore constitute an important demand on the underlying peat.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI 1208170. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The writers would like to acknowledge the assistance of the UC Davis centrifuge team during the experimental testing program. Dr. Ali Shafiee is gratefully recognized for his willingness to share his DSS test data. Professors Jonathan P. Stewart and Samuel Yniesta are thanked for numerous fruitful discussions during the data evaluation process.

References

Andersland, O., Khattak, A., and Al-Khafaji, A. (1981). “Effect of organic material on soil shear strength.” Laboratory shear strength of soil, R. Yong and F. Townsend, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 226–242.
Arulnathan, R., Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2001). “Site response of organic soils.” 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Univ. of Missouri, Rolla, MO.
Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., and Seed, R. B. (2013). “Simplified methodology for consideration of two-dimensional dynamic response of levees in liquefaction-triggering evaluation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1911–1922.
Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F. J., Torres, R. A., and Driller, M. W. (1998). “Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 12–20.
Cappa, R., Yniesta, S., Brandenberg, S., Stewart, J. P., and Lemnitzer, A. (2014). “Centrifuge experiments to evaluate the seismic performance of levees on peaty soils in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.” Proc., Association of State Dam Safety Officials National Conf., Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Lexington, KY.
Cappa, R., Yniesta, S., Lemnitzer, A., Brandenberg, S., and Shaifee, A. (2015). “Settlement estimations of peat during centrifuge experiments.” Geocongress 2015, ASCE, Reston, VA, 152–160.
Cetin, K. O., et al. (2004). “Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1314–1340.
Cola, S., and Cortellazzo, G. (2005). “The shear strength behavior of two peaty soils.” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 23(6), 679–695.
Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., and Power, D. (1982). “Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sand during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method.” Building science series, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
DRMS (Delta Risk Management Services). (2009). “Delta risk management strategy. Phase 1 final report.” URS Corporation, Jack Benjamin and Associates, Inc., California Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA.
Egawa, T., Nishimoto, S., and Tomisawa, K. (2004). “An experimental study on the seismic behavior of embankments on peaty soft ground through centrifuge model tests.” 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Hendry, M. T., Martin, C. D., and Barbour, S. L. (2013). “Measurement of cyclic response of railway embankments and underlying soft peat foundations to heavy axle loads.” Can. Geotech. J., 50(5), 467–480.
Hsu, C. C., and Vucetic, M. (2006). “Threshold shear strain for cyclic pore-water pressure in cohesive soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1325–1335.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. W. (2008). “Monograph MNO-12: Soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Lemnitzer, A., Cappa, R., Yniesta, S., and Brandenberg, S. J. (2016). “Centrifuge testing of model levees atop peaty soil: Experimental data.” Earthquake Spectra, 32(3), 1903–1924.
Marachi, N. D., Dayton, D. J., and Dare, C. T. (1983). “Geotechnical properties of peat in San Joaquin Delta.” Testing of peats and organic soils, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 207–217.
Moharos, I., Oldal, I., and Szekrenyes, A. (2012). Finite element method, Typotex Publishing House, Hungary.
Moreno, C. A., and Rodriguez, E. E. (2004). “Dynamic behavior of Bogota’s subsoil peat and its effect in seismic wave propagation.” 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mortezaie, A. R. (2012). “Cyclic threshold strains in clay versus sands and the change of secant shear modulus and pore water pressure at small cyclic strains.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Moss, R., and Hollenback, J. (2011). “Seismic response of peaty organic soils as a levee foundation material.” Geo-Frontiers 2011, ASCE, Reston, VA, 3097–3106.
Oikawa, H., and Miyakawa, I. (1980). “Undrained shear characteristics of peat.” Soils Found., 20(3), 91–100.
Reinert, E. T., Stewart, J. P., Moss, R. E. S., and Brandenberg, S. J. (2014). “Dynamic response of a model levee on Sherman Island peat: A curated data set.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(2), 639–656.
Settle 3D version 3.0 [Computer software]. Rocscience, Toronto.
Shafiee, A. (2016). “Cyclic and post-cyclic behavior of Sherman Island peat.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 303.
Shafiee, A., Stewart, J. P., and Brandenberg, S. J. (2015). “Reset of secondary compression clock for peat by cyclic straining.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 02815001.
Tokimatsu, K., and Sekiguchi, T. (2007). “Effects of dynamic properties of peat on strong ground motions during 2004 mid Niigata prefecture earthquake.” 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Springer, Berlin.
Vucetic, M. (1994). “Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils.” J. Geotech. Eng., 2208–2228.
Wehling, T. M., Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F., and Driller, M. W. (2003). “Nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous organic soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 929–939.
Yamaguchi, H., Ohira, Y., Kogure, K., and Mori, S. (1985). “Undrained shear characteristics of normally consolidated peat under triaxial compression and extension conditions.” Soils Found., 25(3), 1–18.
Zainorabidin, A., and Wijeyesekera, D. C. (2008). “Geotechnical characteristics of peat.” Advances in Computing and Technology 2008, Proc., AC&T 3rd Annual Conf., School of Architecture, Computing and Engineering, Univ. of East London, London, 71–78.
Zienkiewicz, O. C. (2000). The finite element method, 5th Ed., Vol. 1, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 143Issue 9September 2017

History

Received: Feb 8, 2016
Accepted: Feb 3, 2017
Published online: Jul 5, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Dec 5, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. Cappa, A.M.ASCE
Structural Engineer, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, 4695 MacArthur Ct. #500, Newport Beach, CA 92660; formerly, Ph.D. Graduate, Univ. of California, Irvine, 4135 Engineering Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697.
S. J. Brandenberg, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 5731 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
A. Lemnitzer, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, 4135 Engineering Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share