Numerical Assessment of Subsidence and Adjacent Building Movements Induced by TBM-EPB Tunneling
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 11
Abstract
A three-dimensional (3D) numerical model simulating a twin tunnel excavated by a tunnel-boring machine (TBM)–earth-pressure balance (EPB) is presented. All relevant components are taken into account, and the influence of the parameters adopted in the TBM-EPB method on the induced ground settlements is investigated. The sensitivity to variations of the face support, the pressure applied to the steering gap slurry, and the tail gap grouting were also evaluated within the framework of parametric analyses. The effects from and on a building located at or beyond the greenfield trough width were also investigated. The greenfield volume loss at the ground surface was found to be 0.85%, increasing to 0.97% at the building foundation level. These values were further increased by 6% at the cross section where the building is located. Furthermore, a full soil-structure interaction using 3D numerical analysis was carried out to evaluate the ability of numerical methods to provide accurate displacement prognosis for buildings adjacent to tunnels excavated by the TBM-EPB method. Conclusions regarding the effects of relevant parameters, which have been drawn based on the application of the method to the ongoing Thessaloniki subway, could be useful for the future design and construction of shallow tunnels by the TBM-EPB method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bernat, S., and Cambou, B. (1998). “Soil-structure interaction in shield tunnelling in soft soil.” Comput. Geotech., 22(3–4), 221–242.
Bernat, S., Cambou, B., and Dubois, P. (1999). “Assessing a soft soil tunnelling numerical model using field data.” Géotechnique, 49(4), 427–452.
Comodromos, E. M., Papadopoulou, M. C., and Konstantinidis, G. K. (2013). “Effects from diaphragm wall installation to surrounding soil and adjacent buildings.” Comput. Geotech., 53, 106–121.
Deutches Institut für Normung. (1986). “Cast-in-situ concrete diaphragm walls.” DIN 4126, Berlin.
Dimmock, P., and Mair, R. (2008). “Effect of building stiffness on tunnelling-induced ground movement.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 23(4), 438–450.
Elkayam, I., and Klar, A. (2010). “Nonlinear analysis of tunneling effects on buildings using macro-elements.” Proc., GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling, and Design, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2301–2310.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2004). “Design of concrete structures—Part 1.” Eurocode 2, Brussels, Belgium.
Finno, R. J., and Clough, G. W. (1985). “Evaluation of soil response to EPB shield tunneling.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 155–173.
FLAC3D 5.0 [Computer software]. Minneapolis, Itasca Consulting Group.
Franzius, J. N., Potts, D. M., and Burland, J. B. (2006). “The response of surface structures to tunnel construction.” Geotech. Eng., 159(1), 3–17.
Kasper, T., and Meschke, G. (2004). “A 3D finite element simulation model for TBM tunnelling in soft ground.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 28(14), 1441–1460.
Klar, A., Dromy, I., and Linker, R. (2014). “Monitoring tunneling induced ground displacements using distributed fiber-optic sensing.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 40, 141–150.
Komiya, K., Soga, K., Akagi, H., Hagiwara, T., and Bolton, M. D. (1999). “Finite element modelling of excavation and advancement processes of a shield tunnelling machine.” Soils Found., 39(3), 37–52.
Kronos 2.1.1.1 [Computer software]. Leoben, Austria, Geodata Group.
Lambrughi, A., Medina, L. R., and Castellanzam, R. (2012). “Development and validation of a 3D numerical model for TBM–EPB mechanised excavations.” Comput. Geotech., 40, 97–113.
Mair, R. J., Taylor, R. N., and Bracegirdle, A. (1993). “Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays.” Géotechnique, 43(2), 315–320.
Melis, M., Medina, L., and Rodriguez, J. M. (2002). “Prediction and analysis of subsidence induced by shield tunnelling in the Madrid Metro extension.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(6), 1273–1287.
Melis, M. M., and Medina, L. R. (2005). “Predicted versus measured soil movements induced by shield tunnelling in the Madrid metro extension.” Can. Geotech. J., 42(2), 1160–1172.
Migliazza, M., Chiorboli, M., and Giani, G. P. (2009). “Comparison of analytical method, 3D finite element model with experimental subsidence measurements resulting from the extension of the Milan underground.” Comput. Geotech., 36(1–2), 113–124.
Peck, R. B. (1969). “Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Sociedad Mexicana de Mecanica, Mexico City, 225–290.
Potts, D. M., and Addenbrooke, T. I. (1997). “A structure’s influence on tunnelling-induced ground movements.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng., 125(2), 109–125.
Ruse, N. M., and Schwarz, H. (2012). “Beurteilung der setzungen bei EPB-vortrieben der Metro L9 Barcelona.” Geotechnik, 35(1), 3–10 (in German).
Schmertmann, J. S. (1955). “The undisturbed consolidation of a clay.” Trans. ASCE, 120(1), 1201–1233.
Sirivachiraporn, A., and Phienwej, N. (2012). “Ground movements in EPB shield tunneling of Bangkok subway project and impacts on adjacent buildings.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 30, 10–24.
Sramoon, A., Sugimoto, M., and Kayukawa, K. (2002). “Theoretical model of shield behavior during excavation. II: Application.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 156–165.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 10, 2013
Accepted: Jul 1, 2014
Published online: Jul 29, 2014
Published in print: Nov 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.