Caissons in Cohesionless Soils Considering 3D Wedge under Earthquake Loading
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20, Issue 12
Abstract
Ultimate soil resistance that acts on a seismically induced caisson foundation and its distribution along the caisson height have been formulated by considering passive wedge failure analysis for both dry and submerged conditions. The method for limiting the equilibrium of forces acting on a three-dimensional idealized passive wedge developed due to seismicity has been adapted in this study. Using this process, seismic inertia forces will be computed by considering the surrounding soil as a viscoelastic material that overlays a rigid stratum subjected to a harmonic shaking. For a very large value of caisson width, the comparison of this analysis with a 2D seismic earth pressure problem illustrates the compatibility of this methodology in the plane strain condition. Variation in earth pressure coefficients and their distribution for different seismic acceleration coefficients, soil properties, excess pore pressure ratios, and caisson aspect ratios will be discussed in this analysis. The reasonable agreement of the distribution of total passive pressure along the wedge height under the submerged condition with the experimental results shows the applicability of the proposed formulations as a design approach for caissons in sandy soil.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (Python code).
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- B
- length of caisson foundation;
- D
- width of caisson foundation;
- F
- summation of the radial components of the tangential reactions;
- G
- shear modulus;
- H
- height of caisson foundation;
- h
- height of the idealized wedge;
- Kdpe(α, t)
- seismic passive earth pressure coefficient;
- kh
- horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient;
- kv
- vertical seismic acceleration coefficient;
- m(z)wedge
- mass of thin element of 3D passive wedge;
- P
- reaction force provided by the foundation;
- Pdpe(α, t)
- passive earth pressure force per unit length of the caisson foundation;
- Phydrodynamic
- hydrodynamic pressure;
- pdpe(α, t)
- seismic passive earth pressure;
- phydrodynamic
- distribution of hydrodynamic pressure along height;
- phydrostatic
- distribution of hydrostatic pressure along height;
- Qh(α, t)
- horizontal seismic inertia force;
- Qv(α, t)
- vertical seismic inertia force;
- R
- soil reaction;
- ru
- excess pore pressure ratio;
- T
- period of lateral shaking;
- Twedge
- tangential reaction of soil acting on side area of the wedge;
- uh, uv
- horizontal and vertical displacement;
- Wwedge
- self-weight of the 3D passive wedge;
- z
- unit depth of the idealized wedge;
- α
- angle of inclination of the planar rupture surface with the horizontal;
- β
- base angle of the idealized wedge;
- γdry
- dry unit weight of soil;
- equivalent effective unit weight of soil for submerged conditions;
- γs
- shear strain;
- γsat
- saturated unit weight of soil;
- γsub
- submerged unit weight of soil;
- γw
- unit weight of water;
- δ
- soil–wall interface friction angle;
- θ
- fanning angle of the idealized wedge;
- ϕ
- soil–soil interface friction angle;
- ηs, ηl
- viscosity;
- λ
- Lamé constant;
- ξ
- damping ratio of soil;
- ρ
- soil density;
- τ
- shear stress;
- ψ
- tangential stress coefficient;
- ω
- angular frequency; and
- ωH/Vs, ωH/Vp
- normalized frequencies.
References
Ashour, M., G. Norris, and P. Pilling. 1998. “Lateral loading of a pile in layered soil using the strain wedge model.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (4): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:4(303).
Ashour, M., P. Pilling, and G. Norris. 2004. “Lateral behavior of pile groups in layered soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (6): 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:6(580).
Banerjee, P. K., and S. Gangopadhyay. 1960. “Study on the stability of well foundations for major bridges.” J. Indian Roads Cong. 22: 588–600.
Bellezza, I. 2015. “Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 33 (4): 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9860-1.
Bellezza, I., D. D’Alberto, and R. Fentini. 2012. “Pseudo-dynamic approach for active thrust of submerged soils.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 165 (5): 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.10.00103.
Biswas, S., and D. Choudhury. 2019. “Seismic soil resistance for caisson design in sand.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 172 (1): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.17.00195.
Bowman, E. R. 1958. “Investigation of the lateral resistance to movement of a plate in cohesionless soil.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Choudhury, D., and S. Nimbalkar. 2005. “Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method.” Géotechnique 55 (9): 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.9.699.
Ebeling, R. M., and E. E. Morrison Jr. 1992. The seismic design of waterfront retaining structures. Technical Rep. No. ITL-92-11. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
Gerolymos, N., and G. Gazetas. 2006a. “Winkler model for lateral response of rigid caisson foundations in linear soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.003.
Gerolymos, N., and G. Gazetas. 2006b. “Development of Winkler model for static and dynamic response of caisson foundations with soil and interface nonlinearities.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.002.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 1972. Recommendations for estimating the resistance of soil below the maximum scour level in the design of well foundations of bridges. IRC 45. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Kim, Y., S. Jeong, and S. Lee. 2011. “Wedge failure analysis of soil resistance on laterally loaded piles in clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (7): 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000481.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lancellotta, R. 2007. “Lower-bound approach for seismic passive earth resistance.” Géotechnique 57 (3): 319–321. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.3.319.
Matsuzawa, H., I. Ishibashi, and M. Kawamura. 1985. “Dynamic soil and water pressures on submerged soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (10): 1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:10(1161).
Mondal, G., A. Prashant, and S. K. Jain. 2012. “Simplified seismic analysis of soil–well–pier system for bridges.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 32 (1): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.002.
Olson, S. M., Y. M. A. Hashash, M. R. Muszynski, and C. Phillips. 2017. “Passive wedge formation and limiting lateral pressures on large foundations during lateral spreading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (7): 04017027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001663.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2017. “Seismic passive earth resistance using modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 16 (2): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0381-1.
Prater, E. G. 1977. “An examination of some theories of earth pressure on shaft linings.” Can. Geotech. J. 14 (1): 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1139/t77-007.
Rajesh, B. G., and D. Choudhury. 2017a. “Generalized seismic active thrust on a retaining wall with submerged backfill using a modified pseudodynamic method.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (3): 06016023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000750.
Rajesh, B. G., and D. Choudhury. 2017b. “Seismic passive earth resistance in submerged soils using modified pseudo-dynamic method with curved rupture surface.” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 35 (7): 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1260077.
Škrabl, S., and B. Macuh. 2005. “Upper-bound solutions of three-dimensional passive earth pressures.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (5): 1449–1460. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-067.
Soubra, A. H., and P. Regenass. 2000. “Three-dimensional passive earth pressures by kinematical approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(969).
Steedman, R. S., and X. Zeng. 1990. “The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Géotechnique 40 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103.
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Westergaard, H. M. 1933. “Water pressures on dams during earthquakes.” Trans. ASCE 95: 418–433.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 23, 2019
Accepted: Jul 22, 2020
Published online: Sep 18, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.