Technical Papers
Sep 17, 2020

Critical Factors in Subgrade Rutting Failures of Airfield Mats over Soft Soils under Static Loading

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20, Issue 12

Abstract

Subgrade rutting failures in matting structures present a unique challenge in expedient airfields. Mats are often constructed over existing soft subgrades and can experience aircraft with large gross loads and high tire pressures. It is important to understand and predict the critical factors that contribute to deformation in these thin structures. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive study on the critical factors contributing to rutting in the AM2 matting system under static loading, using a combination of full-scale instrumented testing, layered elastic analysis (LEA), and three-dimensional finite-element (FE) modeling. The FE model of the AM2 mat system is built by implementing a user-defined constitutive model, multimechanical model (MMM), to simulate the soft soil subgrade response. The MMM is a recently developed elastoplastic kinematic hardening model capable of capturing the soil behavior under complex stress histories. The results of the FE model are compared against those attained from a set of linear and nonlinear LEA and full-scale testing. The FE results show a good agreement with the LEA results and the measured data from earth pressure cells and single depth deflectometers. The FE model is then used in a series of sensitivity studies to explicate effects that factors such as loading conditions, subgrade cover material, mat joint load transfer, and mat–soil interface conditions have on deformation response. Results show that incorporating the load transfer mechanism occurring at the mat joints and varying the mat–soil interface condition affect the near surface subgrade deformation and stress responses that contribute to rutting failures. Findings of this study show that although the LEA procedures are the basis of current airfield design methodologies, critical design features and the corresponding deformation responses can be better modeled using the FE approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allou, F., C. Petit, C. Chazallon, and P. Hornych. 2010. “Shakedown approaches to rut depth prediction in low-volume roads.” J. Eng. Mech. 136 (11): 1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000165.
Brown, D. N., and O. O. Thompson. 1973. Lateral distribution of aircraft traffic. Miscellaneous Paper S-73-56. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Burns, C. D., and W. B. Fenwick. 1966. Development of CBR design curves for runways to be surfaced with M8A1 (formerly T10) steel landing Mat. No. AEWES-Misc-Paper-4-817. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Capabilities development document for rapid parking ramp expansion. 2004. Washington, DC: United States Air Force Operational Capabilities Requirements Office.
Doyle, J. D., I. L. Howard, C. A. Gartrell, G. L. Anderton, J. K. Newman, and E. S. Berney IV. 2014. “Full-scale instrumented testing and three-dimensional modeling of airfield matting systems.” Int. J. Geomech. 14 (2): 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000272.
Foster, D. C. 2007. Decks for rapid runway mat application. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Air Force Research Lab, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate.
Garcia, L., T. W. Rushing, and Q. S. Mason. 2014a. AM2 25 CBR subgrade sensitivity test. ERDC/GSL TR-14-7. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Garcia, L., T. W. Rushing, B. A. Williams, and C. A. Rutland. 2014b. AM2 100 CBR subgrade sensitivity test. ERDC/GSL TR-14-37. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Gartrell, C. A. 2007. Full-scale instrumented testing and analysis of matting systems for airfield parking ramps and taxiways. ERDC/GSL TR-07-33. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Gonzalez, C. R., and T. W. Rushing. 2010. “Development of a new design methodology for structural airfield mats.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 3 (3): 102–109.
Gupta, A., P. Kumar, and R. Rastogi. 2015. “Mechanistic–empirical approach for design of low volume pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 16 (9): 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.960999.
Hu, X., and L. F. Walubita. 2011. “Effects of layer interfacial bonding conditions on the mechanistic responses in asphalt pavements.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (1): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000184.
Huang, Y. H. 1993. “KENLAYER computer program.” In Pavement analysis and design, 100–167. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kim, M., and J. H. Lee. 2011. “Study on nonlinear pavement responses of low volume roadways subject to multiple wheel loads.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.554012.
Kruntcheva, M. R., A. C. Collop, and N. H. Thom. 2005. “Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng. 131 (11): 880–888. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(880).
Leski, A., M. Wesołowski, and M. Stefaniuk. 2012. “Evaluation of mobile, composite airfield mat.” Compos. Theory Pract. 12 (4): 237–244.
Mindlin, R. D. 1951. “Influence of rotatory inertia and shear on flexural motions of isotropic elastic plates.” J. Appl. Mech. 18: 31–38.
Miner, M. A. 1945. “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech. 12 (3): A159–A164.
Qiu, Y., N. Dennis, and R. Elliott. 2000. “Design criteria for permanent deformation of subgrade soils in flexible pavements for low-volume roads.” Soils Found. 40 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.40.1.
Rushing, T. W. 2018. Performance prediction relationships for AM2 airfield matting developed from full-scale accelerated testing and laboratory experimentation. ERDC/GSL TR-18-1. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Rushing, T. W., and Q. S. Mason. 2008. AM2 15 CBR subgrade sensitivity test for the rapid parking ramp expansion program. ERDC/GSL TR-08-25. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Rushing, T. W., and J. S. Tingle. 2007. AM2 and M19 airfield mat evaluation for the RPRE program. ERDC/GSL TR-07-5. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Rushing, T. W., N. Torres, and Q. Mason. 2008. AM2 10 CBR subgrade sensitivity test for the rapid parking ramp expansion program. ERDC/GSL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Sahoo, U. C., and K. S. Reddy. 2010. “Effect of nonlinearity in granular layer on critical pavement responses of low volume roads.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 3 (6): 320–325.
Stache, J. M., C. R. Gonzalez, T. W. Rushing, and L. I. Garcia. 2020. “Proposing an updated AM2 mat performance criteria model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (8): 604–615.
Stache, J. M., J. F. Peters, Y. Hammi, and F. Vahedifard. 2019. “A kinematic hardening model based on endochronic theory for complex stress histories.” Comput. Geotech. 114: 103117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103117.
Thompson, A. B., and C. D. Burns. 1960. Criteria for designing runways to be surfaced with landing mat and membrane-type materials. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Thompson, M. R., and R. P. Elliott. 1985. “ILLI-PAVE based response algorithms for design of conventional flexible pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1043: 50–57.
Tolentino, R., M. M. Rahman, D. Cameron, and R. Karim. 2019. “Prediction of flexible pavement’s unbound granular materials using elasto-plastic model SANISAND.” In Airfield and highway pavements 2019: Testing and characterization of pavement materials, edited by I. Al-Qadi, H. Ozer, A. Loizos, and S. Murrell, 481–492. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ulery, H. H. Jr., and D. P. Wolf. 1971. Thickness requirements for soils beneath landing mats; bare base support. No. AEWES-Misc-Paper-S-71-3. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Werkmeister, S., G. Canon Falla, and M. Oeser. 2015. “Analytical design methodology for thin surfaced asphalt pavements in Germany.” In Airfield and highway pavements 2015: Innovative and cost-effective pavements for a sustainable future, edited by J. Harvey and K. F. Chou, 730–741. Reston, VA: ASCE.
White, T. D. 1971. Theoretical landing mat analysis. No. AEWES-Misc-Paper-S-71-21. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Aug 22, 2019
Accepted: Jul 27, 2020
Published online: Sep 17, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 17, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeremiah M. Stache, M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Engineer, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180, United States. Email: [email protected]
CEE Advisory Board Endowed Professor and Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762, United States (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-4533. Email: [email protected]
John F. Peters, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Research Professor, Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762, United States. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share