Testing and Modeling of Saturated Interfaces with Effect of Surface Roughness. II: Modeling and Validations
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 19, Issue 8
Abstract
The data from comprehensive interface simple shear tests on saturated interfaces, presented in Part I of this paper, were used to calculate the parameters in the disturbed state concept (DSC) model. The resulting parameters were then used to verify the DSC model by back-predicting tests from which parameters were determined and by independent tests that were not used in parameter determination. The model predictions, in general, were found to provide highly satisfactory correlation with the observations. In the context of DSC, the concept of critical disturbance was developed to identify initiation of liquefaction in saturated Ottawa sand–steel interfaces; this method is based on microstructural changes in the deforming material leading to instabilities like liquefaction. A new and unique constitutive modeling approach, testing, and validations for interface behavior affected by factors such as surface roughness, confining pressure, amplitude and frequency of cyclic loading are presented in this two-part paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Alanazy, A., and C. S. Desai, 1996. Testing and modeling of sand-steel interfaces under static and cyclic loading. Tucson, AZ: Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Univ. of Arizona.
Alyounis, M. E. 2013. “Effect of soil-structure interaction on the behavior of offshore piles embedded in nonlinear porous media.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Univ. of Arizona.
Alyounis, M. E., and C. S. Desai. 2019. “Testing and modeling of saturated interfaces with effect of surface roughness. I: Test behavior.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (8): 04019096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001459.
Desai, C. S. 2000. “Evaluation of liquefaction using disturbed state and energy approaches.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (7): 618–631. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:7(618).
Desai, C. S. 2001. Mechanics of materials and interfaces: The disturbed state concept. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Desai, C. S., and J. Y. Chen. 2006. “Parameter optimization and sensitivity analysis for disturbed state constitutive model.” Int. J. Geomech. 6 (2): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:2(75).
Desai, C. S., and K. E. El-Hoseiny. 2005. “Prediction of field behavior of reinforced soil wall using advanced constitutive model.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (6): 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:6(729).
Desai, C. S., and K. L. Fishman. 1991. “Plasticity-based constitutive model with associated testing for joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geom. Abstr. 28 (1): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)93229-Y.
Desai, C. S., and Y. Ma. 1992. “Modelling of joints and interfaces using the disturbed-state concept.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 16 (9): 623–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610160903.
Desai, C. S., I. Park, and C. Shao. 1998. “Fundamental yet simplified model for liquefaction instability.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 22 (9): 721–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199809)22:9%3C721::AID-NAG942%3E3.0.CO;2-F.
Desai, C. S., S. K. Pradhan, and D. Cohen. 2005. “Cyclic testing and constitutive modeling of saturated sand-concrete interfaces using the disturbed state concept.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(286).
Desai, C. S., and D. B. Rigby. 1997. “Cyclic interface and joint shear device including pore pressure effects.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (6): 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(568).
Essa, M. J. K., and C. S. Desai. 2017. “Dynamic soil-pile interaction using the DSC constitutive model.” Indian Geotech. J. 47 (2): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0197-3.
Finn, W. D. L., D. J. Pickering, and P. L. Bransby. 1971. “Sand liquefaction in triaxial and simple shear tests.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (4): 639–659.
Liu, M. D., J. P. Carter, and C. S. Desai. 2003. “Modeling compression behavior of structured geomaterials.” Int. J. Geomech. 3 (2): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2003)3:2(191).
Ouria, A., C. S. Desai, and V. Toufigh. 2015. “Disturbed state concept-based solution for consolidation of plastic clays under cyclic loading.” Int. J. Geomech. 15 (1): 04014039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000336.
Pal, S., and G. W. Wathugala. 1999. “Disturbed state model for sand–geosynthetic interfaces and application to pull-out tests.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 23 (15): 1873–1892. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(19991225)23:15%3C1873::AID-NAG12%3E3.0.CO;2-K.
Park, I. J., and C. S. Desai. 2000. “Cyclic behavior and liquefaction of sand using disturbed state concept.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (9): 834–846. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:9(834).
Pradhan, S. K., and C. S. Desai. 2006. “DSC model for soil and interface including liquefaction and prediction of centrifuge test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(214).
Seed, H. B., and K. L. Lee. 1966. “Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92 (6): 105–134.
Varadarajan, A., K. G. Sharma, S. M. Abbas, and A. K. Dhawan. 2006. “Constitutive model for rockfill materials and determination of material constants.” Int. J. Geomech. 6 (4): 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:4(226).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 2, 2018
Accepted: Jan 29, 2019
Published online: May 29, 2019
Published in print: Aug 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.