Quantitative Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Discrete-Element Simulations of Nominally Two-Dimensional Shear Flow
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 13, Issue 3
Abstract
Results obtained from numerical simulations of direct (or ring) shear tests on ASTM standard graded (Ottawa) sand using the discrete-element method with periodic boundary conditions in both two and three dimensions are reported. The data obtained from these simulations are quantitatively compared to experimental data for ASTM standard graded sand. The results show that the three-dimensional (3D) effects of nonplanar interparticle contact forces and particle motion are significant in the 3D discrete-element method simulations, even during nominally two-dimensional (2D) shear flow. Moreover, the 3D discrete-element method simulations accurately predict the peak and residual friction angles of ASTM standard graded sand. On the other hand, the 2D discrete-element method simulations fail to accurately predict the peak and residual friction angles. It is argued that the failure of the 2D discrete-element method simulations and the success of the 3D discrete-element method simulations in providing quantitatively accurate predictions of peak and residual friction angles are attributable largely to the respective absence or presence of 3D effects, including nonplanar interparticle contact forces and nonplanar particle motion, in these discrete-element method simulations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASTM. (2006). “Specification for standard sand.” C 778-06, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bardet, J. P. (1997). Experimental soil mechanics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Cerato, A., and Lutenegger, A. (2006). “Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands.” J. ASTM Geotech Test., 29(6), 1–10.
Chen, F., Drumm, E. C., and Guiochon, G. (2007). “Prediction/verification of particle motion in one dimension with the discrete-element method.” Int. J. Geomech., 7(5), 344–352.
Cheng, Y., and Minh, N. (2009). “DEM investigation of particle size distribution effect on direct shear behaviour of granular agglomerates.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Micromechanics of Granular Media, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 401–404.
Cho, G. C., Dodds, J., and Santamarina, J. (2006). “Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: Natural and crushed sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132(5), 591–602.
Cook, R., Malkus, D., Plesha, M., and Witt, R. (2002). Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, Wiley, New York.
Cui, L., and O’Sullivan, C. (2006). “Exploring the macro- and micro-scale response of an idealised granular material in the direct shear apparatus.” Geotechnique, 56(7), 455–468.
Cundall, P., and Strack, O. (1979). “A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies.” Geotechnique, 29(1), 47–65.
Dang, H. K., and Meguid, M. A. (2010). “Algorithm to generate a discrete element specimen with predefined properties.” Int. J. Geomech., 10(2), 85–91.
Di Maio, F., and Di Renzo, A. (2007). “DEM-CFD simulations of fluidized beds with application in mixing dynamics.” KONA, 25, 205–216.
Di Renzo, A., and Di Maio, F. (2004). “Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(3), 525–541.
Elata, D., and Berryman, J. G. (1996). “Contact force-displacement laws and the mechanical behavior of random packs of identical spheres.” Mech. Mater., 24(3), 229–240.
Frenkel, D., and Smit, B. (2002). Understanding molecular simulation: From algorithms to applications, Academic, San Diego.
Guler, M., Edil, T. B., and Bosscher, P. J. (1999). “Measurement of particle movement in granular soils using image analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 13(2), 116–122.
Jensen, R. P., Edil, T. B., Bosscher, P. J., Plesha, M. E., and Ben Kahla, N. (2001). “Effect of particle shape on interface behavior of DEM-simulated granular materials.” Int. J. Geomech., 1(1), 1–19.
Liu, S. (2006). “Simulating a direct shear box test by DEM.” Can. Geotech. J., 43(2), 155–168.
Liu, S., Sun, D., and Matsuoka, H. (2005). “On the interface friction in direct shear test.” Comput. Geotech., 32(5), 317–325.
Mitchell, J. K., and Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of soil behavior, Wiley, New York.
Ng, T. (2009). “Discrete element method simulations of the critical state of a granular material.” Int. J. Geomech., 9(5), 209–216.
Orlando, A., Hanes, D., and Shen, H. (2009). “Scaling effects in direct shear tests.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Micromechanics of Granular Media, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 413–416.
O’Sullivan, C., and Bray, J. (2004). “Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme.” Eng. Computat., 21(2-4), 278–303.
Plimpton, S. (1995). “Fast parallel algorithms for short range molecular dynamics.” J. Comput. Phys., 117(1), 1–19.
Sandia National Laboratory. (2011). “LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator.” 〈http://lammps.sandia.gov〉 (June 27, 2011).
Silbert, L., Ertas, D., Grest, G., Halsey, T., Levine, D., and Plimpton, S. (2001). “Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology.” Phys. Rev. E, 64(5), 051302-1–051302-14.
Wang, J., and Gutierrez, M. (2009). “Modeling of scale effects on the micromechanics of granular media under direct shear condition.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Micromechanics of Granular Media American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 365–368.
Yan, Y., and Ji, S. (2010). “Discrete element modeling of direct shear tests for a granular material.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 34(9), 978–990.
Zhang, L., and Thornton, C. (2002). “DEM simulations of the direct shear test.” Proc., 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf. (CD-ROM), Columbia Univ., New York.
Zhou, Q., Helenbrook, B., and Shen, H. (2009). “A computational study of the micromechanics under pre and post- failure in a 2-D direct shear test.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Micromechanics of Granular Media, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 405–408.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 13 • Issue 3 • June 2013
Pages: 205 - 212
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 3, 2010
Accepted: Dec 14, 2011
Published online: Dec 17, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.